The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Energy Transitions

  • Peter J. G. Pearson
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_3025

Abstract

This article explains why past, present and future energy transitions matter and why there is so much current interest in them in both developing and industrialised countries. It explores past transitions, including the first and subsequent industrial revolutions – and shows that although energy transitions have proceeded at various speeds in different places and times, and some of the more recent transitions have been faster, transitions do not usually happen quickly. An examination of lock-in, path dependence and the role of incumbents explains why there can be considerable inertia in energy systems and their technologies and institutions – but also suggests that incumbents may have an important role to play in a low-carbon transition. A brief review of recent studies in the area of sustainability transitions shows how researchers have aimed to understand transitions as interacting, co-evolving socio-technical processes and how studies that were mainly qualitative have now achieved better integration with quantitative analyses. A concluding discussion explores the many challenges involved in the governance and implementation of modern purposeful transitions, particularly low-carbon transitions. In these transitions, private incentives to adopt low-carbon fuels, technologies and practices are currently insufficient to ensure their adoption to the extent that makes sense for society; at the same time, the urgency of addressing greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels calls for unprecedentedly rapid change and the use of well-targeted, sustained but flexible policies and instruments.

Keywords

Biomass fuel Climate change Energy policy Energy service Energy transition Environment Fossil fuel Greenhouse gas Industrial revolution Nuclear power Path dependence Primary energy Renewable energy Socio-technical transition 

JEL Classifications

Q32 Q43 Q57 O40 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Work on this article was supported by funding from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [Grant EP/K005316/1] under the ‘Realising Transition Pathways’ project. The author is solely responsible for the views expressed and any errors and omissions. He thanks Roger Fouquet and two reviewers for helpful and perceptive criticisms and suggestions.

Bibliography

  1. Acemoglu, D., U. Akcigit, D. Hanley, and W. R. Kerr. 2014. Transition to clean technology. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 15–045. http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/13506422/15-045.pdf?sequence=1
  2. Allen, R. 2009. The British industrial revolution in global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, R. 2012. Backward into the future. Energy Policy 50: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, D. 1987. The economics of afforestation: A case study in Africa. World Bank Occasional Paper No. 1/New Series. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  5. Arapostathis, S., A. Carlsson-Hyslop, P.J.G. Pearson, J. Thornton, M. Gradillas, S. Laczay, and S. Wallis. 2013. Governing transitions: Cases and insights from two periods in the history of the UK gas industry. Energy Policy 62: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Araújo, K. 2014. The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science 1: 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arthur, W.B. 1994. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aunedi, M., P.A. Kountouriotis, J.E.O. Calderon, D. Angeli, and G. Strbac. 2013. Economic and environmental benefits of dynamic demand in providing frequency regulation. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 4(4): 2036–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnes, D.F., K. Krutilla, and W.F. Hyde. 2005. The urban household energy transition: Social and environmental impacts in the developing world. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  10. Bellamy, R. and, J. Lezaun. 2015. Crafting a public for geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science. 1–16. doi:10.1177/0963662515600965.Google Scholar
  11. Bergek, A., C. Berggren, T. Magnusson, and M. Hobday. 2013. Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? Research Policy 42(6–7): 1210–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bleda, M., and P. del Rio. 2013. The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems. Research Policy 42: 1039–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruns, S.B., C. Gross, and D.I. Stern. 2014. Is there really granger causality between energy use and output? Energy Journal 35(4): 101–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Capstick, S., L. Whitmarsh, W. Poortinga, N. Pidgeon, and P. Upham. 2015. International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 6(1): 35–61.Google Scholar
  15. Carlsson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1(2): 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Central Statistics Office. 2015. Energy statistics 2015. Ministry of statistics and programme implementation, Government of India. New Delhi. http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/Energy_stats_2015_26mar15.pdf
  17. Cleveland, C.J., R.K. Kaufmann, and D.I. Stern. 2000. Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy. Ecological Economics 32: 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coady, D., I. Parry, L. Sears, and B. Shang. 2015. How large are global energy subsidies? IMF Working Paper WP/15/105. International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  19. Crafts, N. 2004. Steam as a general purpose technology: A growth accounting perspective. Economic Journal 114: 338–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crafts, N. 2010. Explaining the first industrial revolution: Two views. European Review of Economic History 15: 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dahmén, E. 1988. ‘Development blocks’ in industrial economics. Scandinavian Economic History Review 36: 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. David, P.A. 2001. Path dependence, its critics and the quest for ‘historical economics’. In Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas: Past and present, ed. P. Garrouste and S. Ioannides, 15–40. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. David, P.A. 2007. Path dependence – A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica 1(2): 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dixon, T., M. Eames, M. Hunt, and S. Lannon. 2014. Urban retrofitting for sustainability: Mapping the transition to 2050. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Eckholm, E. 1975. The other energy crisis: Firewood. Worldwatch Paper 1. Worldwatch Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  26. Elias, R. J., and D. G. Victor. 2005. Energy transitions in developing countries: A review of concepts and literature. Working Paper #40. Program on energy and sustainable development. Stanford University. http://www.trunity.net/files/158401_158500/158492/elias-and-victor-2005.pdf
  27. Elzen, B., F.W. Geels, and K. Green. 2004. Conclusion. transitions to sustainability: Lessons learned and remaining challenges, Ch. 12. In System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy, ed. B. Elzen, F.W. Geels, and K. Green. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emamian, S.M.S. 2014. British electricity policy in flux: Paradigm ambivalence and technological tension. PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  29. Enflo, K., A. Kander, and L. Schön. 2008. Identifying development blocks – A new methodology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ETI. 2015 – Energy Technologies Institute. 2015. Options, choices, actions: UK scenarios for a low carbon energy system transition. Energy Technologies Institute, Loughborough. http://www.eti.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Options-Choices-Actions-Hyperlinked-version-for-digital.pdf
  31. Fouquet, R. 2008. Heat, power and light: Revolutions in energy services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. Fouquet, R. 2010. The slow search for solutions: Lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service. Energy Policy 38(10): 6586–6596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fouquet, R. (ed.). 2013. Handbook on energy and climate change. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  34. Fouquet, R. 2014. Long run demand for energy services: Income and price elasticities over 200 years. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8(2): 186–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fouquet, R. 2015. Lessons from energy history for climate policy. Centre for climate change economics and policy Working Paper 235/Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment Working Paper 209. http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/lessons-from-energy-history-for-climate-policy/
  36. Fouquet, R., and P.J.G. Pearson. 1998. A thousand years of energy use in the United Kingdom. Energy Journal 19(4): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fouquet, R., and P.J.G. Pearson. 2006. Seven centuries of energy services: The price and use of lighting in the United Kingdom (1300–2000). The Energy Journal 27: 139–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fouquet, R., and P.J.G. Pearson. 2012a. Editorial: Past & prospective energy transitions: Insights from history. Introduction to special section. Energy Policy 50: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fouquet, R., and P.J.G. Pearson. 2012b. The long run demand for lighting: Elasticities and rebound effects in different phases of economic development. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy 1: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Foxon, T.J. 2007. Technological lock-in and the role of innovation, ch. 9. In Handbook of sustainable development, ed. G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, and E. Neumayer. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  41. Foxon, T.J. 2011. A co-evolutionary framework for analysing transition pathways to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological Economics 70: 2258–2267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Foxon, T.J. 2012. Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future. Energy Policy 52: 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Foxon, T.J. 2013. Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future. Energy Policy 52: 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Foxon, T.J. 2015. Rationale for policy interventions in sustainability transitions. Paper for 6th international sustainability transitions (IST) conference, SPRU, University of Sussex, Falmer.Google Scholar
  45. Foxon, T.J., and P. Pearson. 2008. Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: Some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(1, Supplement 1): S148–S161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Freeman, C., and F. Louça. 2001. As time goes by. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Freeman, C., and C. Perez. 1988. Structural crises of adjustment: Business cycles and investment behaviour. In Technical change and economic theory, ed. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  48. Fullerton, D.G., N. Bruce, and S.B. Gordon. 2008. Indoor air pollution from biomass fuel smoke is a major health concern in the developing world. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 102: 843–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Furr, N.R., and D.C. Snow. 2014. Intergenerational hybrids: Spillbacks, spillforwards, and adapting to technology discontinuities. Organization Science 26(2): 475–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gallagher, K.S., A. Grübler, L. Kuhl, G. Nemet, and C. Wilson. 2012. The energy technology innovation system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37: 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Garud, R., and P. Karnøe. 2001. Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In Path dependence and creation, ed. R. Garud and P. Karnøe. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. GEA. 2012a. Global energy assessment: Toward a sustainable future, eds. T.B. Johansson, P. Anand, N. Nakicenovic, and L. Gomez-Echeverri. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/Laxenburg. Also at: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/Flagship-Projects/Global-Energy-Assessment/Chapters_Home.en.html
  53. GEA. 2012b. Global energy assessment: Toward a sustainable future (Key Findings, Summary for Policymakers, Technical Summary), eds. T.B. Johansson, P. Anand, N. Nakicenovic, and L. Gomez-Echeverri. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Laxenberg. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/Flagship-Projects/Global-Energy-Assessment/GEA-Summary-web.pdf
  54. Geels, F. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31: 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Geels, F.W. 2005. Technological transitions and system innovations: A coevolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Geels, F.W., and J. Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36: 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gentilvaite, R., A. Kander, and P. Warde. 2015. The role of energy quality in shaping long-term energy intensity in Europe. Energies 8: 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gordon, R.J. 2000. Does the ‘New Economy’ measure up to the great inventions of the past? Working Paper 7833, National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7833
  59. Grin, J., J. Rotmans, J. Schot, F. Geels, and D. Loorbach. 2010. Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Grubler, A. 2008. Energy transitions, The encyclopedia of earth [online]. http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/152561/
  61. Grubler, A. 2012. Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy 50: 8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hammond, G.P., and P.J.G. Pearson. 2013. Challenges of the transition to a low carbon, more electric future: From here to 2050. Energy Policy 52: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hammond, G.P., and J. Spargo. 2014. The prospects for coal-fired power plants with carbon capture and storage: A UK perspective. Energy Conversion and Management 86: 476–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hammond, G.P., Á. O’Grady, and D.E. Packham. 2015. Energy technology assessment of shale gas ‘fracking’ – A UK perspective. Energy Procedia 75: 2764–2771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hekkert, M., R.A.A. Suurs, S. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R. Smits. 2007. Functions of Innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74: 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hughes, T.P. 1983. Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  67. Hughes, N., and N. Strachan. 2010. Methodological review of UK and international low carbon scenarios. Energy Policy 38: 6056–6065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. IEA (International Energy Agency). 2014. Africa energy outlook. OECD/IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2014_AfricaEnergyOutlook.pdf
  69. IEA (International Energy Agency). 2015a. India energy outlook. World energy outlook Special Report. Paris: OECD/IEA. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/india/
  70. IEA (International Energy Agency). 2015b. Southeast Asia Energy outlook. World energy outlook Special Report. Paris: OECD/IEA. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2015_SouthEastAsia.pdf
  71. IEA (International Energy Agency). 2015c. Special data release with revisions for peoples Republic of China. Paris: OECD/IEA. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/SpecialdatareleasewithrevisionsforPeoplesRepublicofChina04.11.2015.pdf
  72. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf
  73. Jacobsson, S., and V. Lauber. 2006. The politics and policy of energy system transformation – Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34: 256–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Johnson, V.C.A., F. Sherry-Brennan, and P.J.G. Pearson. 2016. Alternative liquid fuels in the UK in the inter-war period (1918–1938): Insights from a failed energy transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.12.001.Google Scholar
  75. Joskow, P. 2015. The shale gas revolution: Introduction. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy 4(1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Joskow, P.L. and, J.E. Parsons. 2012. The future of nuclear power after Fukushima. MIT Center for energy and environmental policy research Working Paper CEEPR WP2012-001. http://web.mit.edu/ceepr/www/publications/workingpapers/2012-001.pdf
  77. Kander, A., and D. Stern. 2014. Economic growth and the transition from traditional to modern energy in Sweden. Energy Economics 46: 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kander, A., P. Malanima, and P. Warde. 2013. Power to the people: Energy in Europe over the last five centuries. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Kemp, R., and D. Loorbach. 2006. Transition management: A reflexive governance approach, ch. 5. In Reflexive governance for sustainable development, ed. J.-P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  80. Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation. The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10(2): 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kemp, R., A. Rip, and J. Schot. 2001. Constructing transition paths through the management of niches. In Path dependence and creation, ed. R. Garud and P. Karnoe, 269–299. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  82. Kim, Y.H. 1983. Rational and effective use of energy in Korea’s industrialisation. Energy 8(1–2): 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Landes, D.S. 1969. The unbound prometheus: Technological change and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Li, F.G.N., E. Trutnevyte, and N. Strachan. 2015. A review of socio-technical energy transition (STET) models. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 100: 290, online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Liu, Z., D. Guan, D. Crawford-Brown, Q. Zhang, K. He, and J. Liu. 2013. A low-carbon road map for China. Nature 500: 143–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Marchetti, C., and, N. Nakicćenović. 1979. The dynamics of energy systems and the logistic substitution model. (Research Report 79–13). Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
  87. Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41: 955–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Markard, J., M. Hekkert, and S. Jacobsson. 2015. The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16: 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mazzucato, M., and C. Penna. 2015. Mission-oriented finance for innovation: New ideas for investment-led growth. London: Policy Network and Rowman and Littlefield International. http://www.policy-network.net/publications/4860/Mission-Oriented-Finance-for-Innovation
  90. Mendonça, S. 2013. The ‘sailing ship effect’: Reassessing history as a source of insight on technical change. Research Policy 42: 1724–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mokyr, J. 1999. The second industrial revolution, 1870–1914. In Storia Delleconomia Mondiale, ed. V. Castronovo. Rome: Laterza. http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~jmokyr/castronovo.pdf
  92. Mokyr, J. 2009. The enlightened economy. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  93. National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2015. China statistical yearbook 2014. China Statistics Press. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2014/indexeh.htm
  94. Newbery, D. 2015. Reforming UK energy policy to live within its means. Energy Policy Research Group Working Paper 1516. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  95. North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. O’Connor, P.A. 2014. Aspects of energy transitions: History and determinants. Doctoral Dissertation. Boston University.Google Scholar
  97. O’Connor, P.A., and C.J. Cleveland. 2014. U.S. energy transitions 1780–2010. Energies 7(12): 7955–7993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ogawa, Y. 1991. Economic activity and the greenhouse effect. Energy Journal 12(1): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pearson, P. 1988. Energy transitions in less-developed countries: Analytical frameworks for practical understanding. Energy Discussion Paper 40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Energy Research Group.Google Scholar
  100. Pearson, P.J.G., and R. Fouquet. 1996. Energy efficiency, economic efficiency and future CO2 emissions from the developing world. The Energy Journal 17(4): 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pearson, P.J.G., and R. Fouquet. 2003. Long run carbon dioxide emissions and Kuznets curves: Pathways to development. In Energy in a competitive market: Essays in honour of colin robinson, ed. L.C. Hunt. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  102. Pearson, P.J.G., and R. Fouquet. 2006. Long run carbon dioxide emissions and Kuznets curves: Pathways to development. In Energy in a competitive market, ed. L. Hunt. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  103. Pearson, P.J.G., and T.J. Foxon. 2012. A low-carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations. Energy Policy 50: 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pearson, P.J.G. and, J. Watson. 2012. UK energy policy 19802010: A history and lessons to be learned. London: IET/The Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies. http://www.theiet.org/factfiles/energy/uk-energy-policy-page.cfm?type=pdf
  105. Pearson, P.J.G. and, J. Watson. 2013. UK energy policy 19802010: A history and lessons to be learnt: A review to mark 30 years of the parliamentary group for energy studies. IET and Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies. http://www.theiet.org/factfiles/energy/uk-energy-policy-page.cfm?type=pdf
  106. Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Pudjianto, D., M. Aunedi, P. Djapic, and G. Strbac. 2014. Whole-systems assessment of the value of energy storage in low-carbon electricity systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 5(2): 1098–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rasch, E.D., and M. Köhne. 2015. Hydraulic fracturing, energy transition and political engagement in the Netherlands: The energetics of citizenship. Energy Research & Social Science. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.014.Google Scholar
  109. Raven, R., F. Kern, A. Smith, S. Jacobsson, and B. Verhees. 2015. The politics of innovation spaces for low-carbon energy. Introduction to the special issue. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.008.Google Scholar
  110. Reddy, B.S. 2014. Indias energy transitionPathways for low-carbon economy. WP-2014-025. Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research. http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2014-025.pdf
  111. Richter, M. 2013. Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy. Energy Policy 62: 1226–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. Technological change. In Human choice and climate change – Resources and technology, ed. S. Rayner and E.L. Malone, 327–399. Columbus: Battelle Press.Google Scholar
  113. Rosenberg, N. 1976. Perspectives on technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. RTP Engine Room – Realising Transition Pathways Engine Room. 2015. Distributing power: A transition to a civic energy future. Realising Transition Pathways Research Consortium. Bath: University of Bath. http://www.realisingtransitionpathways.org.uk/realisingtransitionpathways/news/FINAL_distributing_power_report_WEB.pdf
  115. Rubio, M.S., and M. Folchi. 2012. Will small energy consumers be faster in transition? Evidence from the early shift from coal to oil in Latin America. Energy Policy 50: 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Schurr, S.H., and B.C. Netschert. 1960. Energy in the American economy, 18501975. An economic study of its history and prospects. (Resources for the Future, Inc.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  117. Smil, V. 1994. Energy in world history. Boulder/London: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  118. Smil, V. 2000. Energy in the twentieth century: Resources, conversions, costs, uses, and consequences. Annual Review of Energy & Environment 25: 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Smil, V. 2010. Energy transitions: History, requirements, Prospects. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  120. Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34: 1491–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sovacool, B.K. 2016 (in press). How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research and Social Science. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629615300827
  122. Stern, N. 2007. The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Stern, D.I. 2010. Energy quality. Ecological Economics 69(7): 1471–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Stevens, P. 2013. Gas markets: Past, present and future, Ch. 5. In Handbook on energy and climate change, ed. R. Fouquet. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  125. Truffer, B., Markard, J., Binz, C., and S. Jacobsson. 2012. A literature review on energy innovation systems. EIS Radar paper [online]. http://www.eis-all.dk/~/media/Sites/EIS_Energy_Innovation_Systems/english/about%20eis/Publications/EIS_Radarpaper_final.ashx
  126. Trutnevyte, E., J. Barton, Á. O'Grady, D. Ogunkunle, D. Pudjianto, and E. Robertson. 2014. Linking a storyline with multiple models: A cross-scale study of the UK power system transition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 89: 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Turner, K. 2013. ‘Rebound’ effects from increased energy efficiency: A time to pause and reflect. Energy Journal 34(4): 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Turnheim, B., and F.W. Geels. 2013. The destabilisation of existing regimes: Confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913–1967). Research Policy 42(10): 1749–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Turnheim, B., F. Berkhout, F.W. Geels, A. Hof, A. McMeekin, B. Nykvist, and D.P. van Vuuren. 2015. Evaluating the sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environmental Change 35: 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). 2015. Adoption of the paris agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Paris UNFCCC. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
  131. Unruh, G.C. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28: 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Unruh, G.C. 2002. Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30: 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Unruh, G.C., and J. Carrillo-Hermosilla. 2006. Globalizing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 34: 1185–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Van Den Bergh, J.C.J.M., B. Truffer, and G. Kallis. 2011. Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. van der Ploeg, R. 2011. Macroeconomics of sustainability transitions: Second-best climate policy, Green Paradox, and renewable subsidies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1(1): 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Voss, J.-P., A. Smith, and J. Grin. 2009. Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences 42: 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Warde, P. 2007. Energy consumption in England and wales 1560–2000. Napoli: ISSM-CNR.Google Scholar
  138. Watson, J. ed. et al. 2012. Carbon capture and storage: Realising the potential? UKERC Report UKERC/RR/ESY/CCS/2012/001. London: UK Energy Research Centre. http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/support/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=2421
  139. Wilson, C. 2012. Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies. Energy Policy 50: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wrigley, E.A. 1988. Continuity, chance and change. The character of the industrial revolution in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wrigley, E.A. 2010. Energy and the english industrial revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. G. Pearson
    • 1
  1. 1.