Abstract
The open source model is a form of software development in which the source code is made available, free of charge, to all interested parties; further users have the right to modify and extend the program. Open source software (OSS) methods rely on developers who reveal the source code under an open source licence. Under certain types of open source licence, any further development using the source code must also be publicly disclosed. In this brief survey, we will focus on several key aspects of open source software.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Athey, S., and G. Ellison. 2009. Dynamics of open source movements. Mimeo.
Bessen, J., and E. Maskin. 2006. Sequential innovation, patents, and innovation. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/clanajeco/321307000000000021.htm
Boldrin, M., and D.K. Levine. 2009. Market structure and property rights in open source. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 30: 325.
Bonaccorsi, A., and C. Rossi. 2002. Licensing schemes in the production and distribution of open source software: An empirical investigation. http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/bnaccorsirossilicense.pdf
Bradner, S. 1999. The internet engineering task force. In Open sources: Voices from the revolution, ed. C. DiBona, S. Ockman, and M. Stone. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media Inc.
Chakravarty, S., E. Haruvy, and F. Wu. 2007. The link between incentives and product performance in open source development: An empirical investigation. Global Business and Economics Review 9: 151–169.
Casadesus-Masanell, R., and P. Ghemawat. 2006. Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs Windows. Management Science 52(7): 1072–1084.
Comino, S., F. Manenti, and M. Parisi. 2007. On the success of open source projects. Research Policy 36: 1575–1586.
DiBona, C., S. Ockman, and M. Stone, eds. 1999. Open sources: Voices from the revolution. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media Inc.
DiBona, C., D. Cooper, and M. Stone. 2006. Open sources 2.0: The continuing revolution. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media Inc.
Economides, N., and E. Katsamakas. 2006. Two-sided competitions of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and implications for the software industry. Management Science 52(7): 1057–1071.
Fershtman, C., and N. Gandal. 2007. Open source software: Motivation and restrictive licensing. International Economics and Economic Policy 4: 209–225.
Fershtman, C., and N. Gandal. 2011. Direct and indirect knowledge spillovers: The ‘social network’ of open source projects. RAND Journal of Economics 42: 70–91.
Ghosh, R., R. Glott, B. Krieger, and G. Robles. 2002. Free/libre and open source software: Survey and study, Part IV: Survey of developers. FLOSS Report, International Institute of Infonomics, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/report/Final4.htm
Greenstein, S. 2011. Innovative conduct in U.S. commercial computing and Internet markets. In Handbook on the economics of innovation, ed. B. Hall and N. Rosenberg, Forthcoming.
Hann, I., J. Roberts, S. Slaughter, and R. Fielding. 2004. An empirical analysis of economic returns to open source participation. http://wwwrcf.usc.edu/hann/publications_files/economic_returns_to_open_source_participation.pdf
Harhoff, D., J. Henkel, and E. von Hippel. 2003. Profiting from voluntary spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy 32: 1753–1769.
Hars, A., and S. Ou. 2001. Working for free? Motivations for participating in open source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6: 25–39.
Hertel, G., S. Niedner, and S. Herrmann. 2003. Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy 32: 1159–1177.
Johnson, J. 2002. Open source software: Private provision of a public good. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 11: 637–662.
Johnson, J. 2006. Collaboration, peer review and open source software. Information Economics and Policy 18: 477–497.
Koski, H. 2005. OSS production and licensing strategies of software firms. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 2: 111–125.
Lakhani, K., and R. Wolf. 2005. Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and efforts in free open source projects. In Perspectives on free and open source software, ed. J. Feller/Open, B. Fitzgerland, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhani. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lerner, J., P. Parag, and J. Tirole. 2006. The dynamics of open-source contributors. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 96: 114–118.
Lerner, J., and M. Schankerman. 2010. The comingled code: Open source and economic development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lerner, J., and J. Tirole. 2002. Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics 52: 197–234.
Lerner, J., and J. Tirole. 2005a. The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 99–120.
Lerner, J., and J. Tirole. 2005b. The scope of open source licensing. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 21: 20–56.
Llanes, G., and R. De Elejalde. 2009. Industry equilibrium with open source and proprietary firms. Mimeo, http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/09-149.pdf
Maurer, S., and S. Scotchmer. 2006. Open source software: The new intellectual property paradigm. Economics and Information Systems 1: 285–322.
Raymond, E. 2000. The cathedral and the bazaar. http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/
Rossi, C., and A. Bonaccorsi. 2005. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic incentives in profit-oriented firms supplying open source products and services. First Monday, Issue 10, No. 5. http://pear.accc.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/1242
Stallman, R. 1999. The GNU operating system and the free software movement. In Open sources: Voices from the revolution, ed. C. DiBona, S. Ockman, and M. Stone. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.
von Krogh, G., and E. von Hippel. 2006. The promise of research on open source software. Management Science 52: 975–983.
West, J., and S. Gallagher. 2006. Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open source software. R&D Management 36: 315–328.
West, J., and S. O’Mahoney. 2008. The role of participation architectures in growing sponsored open source communities. Industry and Innovation 15(2): 145–168.
Acknowledgments
We are especially grateful to Shane Greenstein for many comments and suggestions that significantly improved the manuscript. We are also grateful to Jacques Lawarree, and Nick Tsilas for very helpful comments and suggestions. An academic research grant from Microsoft is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Fershtman, C., Gandal, N. (2018). Open Source Software, a Brief Survey of the Economics of. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2997
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2997
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences