The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

European Cohesion Policy

  • Willem Molle
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2981

Abstract

One of the main objectives of the EU is cohesion, namely a decrease in the disparity of wealth between its constituent parts. A considerable part of the EU budget is earmarked for this policy. The policy should also support the EU 2020 strategy, which focuses on smart, inclusive and sustainable growth. Over the past decades the EU has been able to realize to some extent its ambitions. Effectiveness can be further stepped up by making improvements in the delivery system.

Keywords

Convergence Competitiveness Coordination Disparity Effectiveness of intervention Regulation Principles Structural Funds 

JEL Classifications

R1 R53 R58 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bachtler, J., and C. Mendez. 2007. Who governs EU cohesion policy? Deconstructing reforms of the Structural Funds. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(3): 535–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barca, F. 2009. An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Brussels (available from the Commission website; DG Regio).Google Scholar
  3. Basle, M. 2006. Strengths and weaknesses of European Union policy evaluation methods; ex post evaluation of Objective 2, 1994–1999. Regional Studies 40(2): 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Begg, I. 2008. Subsidiarity in regional policy. In Subsidiarity and economic reform in Europe, ed. G. Gelauff, I. Grilo, and A. Lejour, 291–310. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Begg, I. 2010. Cohesion or confusion; a policy searching for objectives. Journal of European Integration 32(1): 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boldrin, M., and F. Canova. 2003. Regional policies and EU enlargement. CEPR discussion paper series, no. 3744.Google Scholar
  7. Bornschier, V., M. Herkenrath, and P. Ziltener. 2004. Political and economic logic of Western European integration: A study of convergence comparing member and non member states 1980–1998. European Societies 6(1): 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dall’Erba, S., and J. Le Gallo. 2008. Regional convergence and the impact of European Structural Funds over 1989–1999: A spatial econometric analysis. Papers in Regional Science 87(2): 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duehr, S., C. Colomb, and V. Nadin. 2010. European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. EC. 2010a. Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM 2020, 3 March.Google Scholar
  11. EC. 2010b. Regional policy, an integrated approach. Panorama Inforegio, 34.Google Scholar
  12. EC. 2010c. Investing in Europes future: Fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  13. EC. 2010d. Conclusions of the fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion: The future of cohesion policy, (SEC 2010) 1348 final. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  14. ECORYS/CPB/Ifo. 2008. A study on EU spending, Final report. Rotterdam (available from the website of the EU Commission).Google Scholar
  15. Ederveen, S., J. Gorter, R. de Mooy, and R. Nahuis. 2003. Funds and games; the economics of European cohesion policy. ENEPRI Occasional paper no. 3. .http://www.enepri.org/.
  16. ENEA. 2006. The contribution of structural and cohesion funds to a better environment (available via the EC website).Google Scholar
  17. Gualini, E. 2004. Multi-level governance and institutional change: The Europeanization of regional policy in Italy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Leonardi, R. 2005. Cohesion policy in the European Union: The building of Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lion, C., P. Martini, and S. Volpi. 2004. Evaluation of European Social Fund Programmes in a new framework of multinational governance; the Italian experience. Regional Studies 38(2): 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mairate, A. 2006. The ‘added value’ of European cohesion policy. Regional Studies 40(2): 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin, C., and I. Saenz. 2003. Real convergence and European Integration; the experience of the less developed EU members. Empirica 30(3): 205–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin, R., and P. Tyler. 2006. Evaluating the impact of the Structural Funds on Objective 1 regions, an exploratory discussion. Regional Studies 40(2): 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meijers, E., and D. Staed. 2004. Policy integration; what does it mean and how can it be achieved?; A multidisciplinary review. Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Greening of Policies, Interlinkages and Policy Integration. http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2009/wp73_2009.pdf.
  24. Molle, W. 2007. European cohesion policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Molle, W. 2009. European innovation policy; increased effectiveness through coordination with cohesion policy. In Enhancing the effectiveness of innovation in Europe; new roles for key players, ed. W. Molle and J. Djarova, 167–200. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Molle, W. 2011. Europe Post 2013? Limit Ambitions; Step up Capacity! (paper for the April 2011 Bled conference of the Regional Studies Association, available from their website).Google Scholar
  27. Tarschys, D. 2003. Reinventing cohesion: The future of European Structural Policy, Report no 1. Stockholm: Sieps.Google Scholar
  28. Tselios, V. 2009. Growth and convergence in income per capita and income inequality in the regions of the EU. Spatial Economic Analysis 4(3): 344–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willem Molle
    • 1
  1. 1.