Skip to main content

Preindustrial Inequality

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

This article considers inequality in preindustrial societies, defined as those prior to the industrial revolution and subsequent non-industrial societies that are not systematically integrated into the advanced world’s economy. Although data on individual incomes and wealth in these societies are limited, increasingly they are becoming available. On the basis of these data, inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient is often on a par with modern industrialized societies, but the income gradient tends to be different, with a mass of people at subsistence level or marginally above, few at the mean, and a small affluent class. More work remains to be done, particularly on the relationship between income inequality and economic progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Allen, R.C. 1992. Enclosures and the Yeoman: Agricultural development of the South Midlands, 1450–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R.C. 2003. Progress and poverty in early modern Europe. Economic History Review 56: 403–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R.C. 2007. How prosperous were the Romans? Evidence from Diocletian’s Price Edict (AD 301), Discussion Paper Series 363. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Economics, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkell, T. 2006. Illuminations and distortions: Gregory King’s scheme calculated for the year 1688 and the social structure of later Stuart England. Economic History Review 59: 32–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. 1990. International trade, government and income distribution in Peru since 1870. Latin American Research Review 25(2): 31–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bértola, L., C. Castelnovo, E. Reis, and H. Willebald 2006. Income distribution in Brazil, 1839–1939. Paper presented at Session 116 of “A Global History of Income Distribution in the Long 20th Century,” XIV International Economic History Congress, Helsinki-Finland 21–25 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bértola, L., C. Castelnovo, J. Rodriguez, and H. Willeband 2009. Income distribution in Latin American Southern Cone countries during the first globalization boom, ca. 1870–1920. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. 2007. Benchmarking medieval economic development: England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland c. 1209. Economic History Review 60: 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. 2005. The condition of the working class in England, 1209–2004. Journal of Political Economy 115: 1307–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgel, M. 2004. Ottoman tax registers. Historical Methods 37(2), Spring, 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgel, M. 2006. Taxes, efficiency, and redistribution: Discriminatory taxation of villages in Ottoman Palestine, Southern Syria, and Transjordan in the sixteenth century. Explorations in Economic History 43: 332–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1835. Memoir on pauperism, 1997. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, S., and K. Sokoloff 1997. Factor endowments, institutions and differential paths of growth among New World economies. In How Latin America fell behind: Essays on the economic histories of Brazil and Mexico, 18001914, ed. S. Hager, 260–304. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, C. 1988. The rise and fall of the Williamson curve. Journal of Economic History 48: 699–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finley, M. 1985. The ancient economy, 2nd ed. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A.G. 1998. Re-orient: Global economy in the Asian age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R.W. 1984. An estimate of the size and structure of the national product of the early Roman Empire. Review of Income and Wealth 30: 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy, D., and C. Klapisch-Zuber. 1985. Tuscans and their families. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy, D., C. Klapisch-Zuber, R.B. Litchfield, and A. Molho The online catasto. Available at: http://www.stg.brown.edu/projects/catasto/overview.html. Accessed January 2008 (a searchable online database of tax information for the city of Florence in 1427–29, based on D. Herlihy and C. Klapisch-Zuber, principal investigators, Census and property survey of Florentine dominions in the province of Tuscany, 1427–1480).

  • Hoffman, P.T., D. Jacks, P.A. Levin, and P.H. Lindert. 2002. Real inequality in Europe since 1500. Journal of Economic History 62: 322–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. 1955. Economic growth and income inequality, presidential address to the 67th meeting of the American Economic Association, Michigan, December 1954; published in American Economic Review 45 (1955) and Economic growth and structure: Selected essays. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laiou, A. 2002. The economic history of Byzantium: From the seventh through the fifteenth century. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P.H. 2000. Three centuries of inequality in Britain and the United Stares. In Handbook of income distribution, ed. A. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P.H., and J.G. Williamson. 1982. Revising England’s social tables, 1688–1812. Explorations in Economic History 19: 385–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P.H., and J.G. Williamson. 1983. Reinterpreting Britain’s social tables, 1688–1913. Explorations in Economic History 20: 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P.H., and J.G. Williamson. 1985. Growth, equality and history. Explorations in Economic History 22: 341–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malanima, P. 2006. Pre-modern equality: Income distribution in the Kingdom of Naples (1811). Paper presented at 14th International Congress of Economic History, August 2006, Helsinki. Available at: http://www.helsinki.fi/iehc2006/papers3/Malanima.pdf.

  • Mayhew, N.J. 1995. Modeling medieval monetization. In A commercialising economy: England 1086 to c. 1300, ed. R.N. Britnell and B.M.S. Campbell, 55–77. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCants, A. 2007. Inequality among the poor of eighteenth century Amsterdam. Explorations in Economic History 44: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. 2006. An estimate of average income and inequality in Byzantium around year 1000. Review of Income and Wealth 52(3): 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B., P.H. Lindert, and J.G. Williamson 2009. Preindustrial inequality. Unpublished ms, available at: http://econ.worldbank.org/projects/inequality. Previous version published as Measuring ancient inequality, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 13550.

  • Morrisson, C., and W. Snyder. 2000. The income inequality of France in historical perspective. European Review of Economic History 4: 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. 1896. La courbe de la repartition de la richesse. Université de Lausanne. Republished as On the distribution of wealth and income, Rivista di Politica Economica, 645–660, 1997. (The same issue of Rivista di Politica Economica contains English translations of five other articles by Pareto on the same topic.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pen, J. 1971. Income distribution: Facts, theories, policies. New York/Washington, DC: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, K. 2000. The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prados de la Escosura, L. 2007. Inequality and poverty in Latin America: A long-run exploration. In The new comparative economic history: Essays in honor of Jeffrey G. Williamson, ed. T.J. Hutton, K.H. O’Rourke, and A.M. Taylor, pp. 291–315. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prados de la Escosura, L. 2008. Inequality, poverty, and the Kuznets curve in Spain, 1850–2000. European Review of Economic History 12: 287–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostovtzeff, M. 1926. The social and economic history of the Roman Empire, 1957. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel, W., and S.J. Friesen 2009. The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire. Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavone, A. 1995. The end of the past: Ancient Rome and the modern West, 2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, L.D. 1979. Income distribution and social structure in London in the late eighteenth century. Economic History Review 32: 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiue, C., and W. Keller 2007. Markets in China and Europe on the eve of the industrial revolution. American Economic Review 97: 1189–1216, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltow, L. 1968. Long-run changes in British income inequality. Economic History Review 21: 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltow, L. 1989. Income and wealth inequality in Amsterdam, 1585–1805. Economisch-en-Social Historisch 58: 72–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltow, L., and J.-L. van Zanden. 1998. Income and wealth inequality in the Netherlands, 16th–20th century. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, N. 2005. Income inequality in Paris at the heyday of the commercial revolution. Jerusalem: Hebrew University. Available at: http://economics.huji.ac.il/facultye/sussman/sussman_gobaleconomies.pdf.

  • Van Zanden, J.L. 1995. Tracing the beginning of the Kuznets curve: Western Europe during the early modern period. Economic History Review 48: 643–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zanden, J.L. 2003. Rich and poor before the industrial revolution: A comparison between Java and the Netherlands at the beginning of the 19th century. Explorations in Economic History 40(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walbank, F.W. 1946. The decline of the Roman Empire in the West. London: Cobbett Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, J.G. 2009. Why was China trapped in an agrarian society – An economicgeographical approach to the Needham puzzle. New History, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J.G. 1980. Earnings inequality in nineteenth century England. Journal of Economic History 40: 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J.G. 1982. The structure of pay in Britain, 1710–1911. Research in Economic History 7: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J.G. 1985. Did British capitalism breed inequality? Boston: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J.G. 2009. History without evidence: Latin American inequality since 1491. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Mihail Arandarenko, Peter Lindert, Leandro Prados de la Escosura and Jeffrey Williamson for excellent comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Milanovic, B. (2018). Preindustrial Inequality. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2953

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics