Abstract
The European Union (EU)’s research and experimental development (R&D) policy pursues a range of objectives stated explicitly in the Treaty. Over time, EU R&D policy has gained in importance compared with other EU policies (as a result of the EU Lisbon, revised Lisbon and Europe 2020 strategies) and compared to Member State policies (as a result of a better recognition of the added value of action at EU level). EU R&D policy has so far consisted mainly of supply side-oriented direct financial support in the form of ever larger and more complex multi-annual ‘Framework Programmes’ supporting cross-border research programme coordination, frontier and cross-border collaborative research projects, international researcher mobility, research infrastructure access etc. Large-scale ‘additional’ impacts have been achieved by these Framework Programmes. In recent years, indirect support in the form of policy advocacy has gained in importance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Annerberg, R., I. Begg, H. Acheson, S. Borrás, A. Hallén, T. Maimets, R. Mustonen, H. Raffler, J.P. Swings, and K. Ylihonko. 2010. Interim evaluation of the seventh framework programme – Report of the expert group. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
Arnold, E. 2005. What the evaluation record tells us about framework programme performance. Brighton: Technopolis Group.
Arnold, E. 2009. Framework programme 6 – Meta-evaluation. Brighton: Technopolis Group.
COWI. 2009. Assessment of the impact of the 6th framework programme on new member States. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
Dahrendorf, R. 1973. Towards a European science policy. Southampton: University of Southampton.
EPEC. 2008. Ex-post Impact Assessment FP6 Subpriority ‘Global change and ecosystems’. Final Report, European Policy Evaluation Consortium (EPEC) and Technopolis Ltd for the Directorate-General for Research.
EPEC. 2009. Bibliometric profiling of framework programme participants – Final report. European Policy Evaluation Consortium (EPEC), European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
European Commission. 1997. EU research and technological development activities, 5-year assessment of the European community RTD framework programmes: Report of the independent expert panel – Commission’s comments – Communication from the commission, COM(97) 151 final. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. 2005. Five-year assessment of the European union research framework programmes 1999–2003. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
European Commission. 2013. The grand challenge. The design and societal impact of horizon 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Court of Auditors. 2007. Evaluating the EU RTD FP – Could the commission’s approach be improved? Special Report no 9/2007.
European Court of Auditors. 2009. ‘Networks of excellence’ and ‘Integrated projects’ in community research policy: Did they achieve their objectives? Special Report no 8/2009.
Federal Ministry of Education and Research. 2009. German participation in the sixth European framework programme for research and technological development. Berlin: Bonn.
Forfás. 2009. Evaluation of framework programme 6 in Ireland. Forfás.
IDEA Consult. 2009. Participation survey and assessment of the impact of the actions completed under the 6th framework programme. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
ITRE Committee Report. 2011. Report on FP7 interim evaluation, 2011/2043(INI), rapporteur: J. P. Audy. European Parliament.
Majó, J., G. Argyropoulos, S. Barabaschi, J. Bell, H. Danielmeyer, Y. Farge, S. McKenna-Lawlor, F. Thys-Clement, C. Ullenius, J. Viana Baptista, N. Wilhjelm, and K. Guy. 2000. Five-year assessment of the European union research and technological development programmes, 1995–1999 – Report of the independent expert panel. Brussels: European Commission.
Muldur, U., F. Corvers, H. Delanghe, J. Dratwa, D. Heimberger, B. Sloan, and S. Vanslembrouck. 2006. A new deal for an effective European research policy. The design and impacts of the 7th framework programme. Dordrecht: Springer.
Polt, W., N. Vonortas, and R. Fisher. 2008. Innovation impact study – Final report. Brussels: DG Research.
Rietschel, E., E. Arnold, C. Antanas, A. Dearing, I Feller, S. Joussaume, A. Kaloudis, L. Lange, J. Langer, V. Ley, R. Mustonen, D. Pooley, and N. Stame. 2009. Evaluation of the sixth framework programmes for research and technological development 2002–2006 – Report of the expert group. European Commission.
Stampfer, M. 2008. European added value of community research activities – Expert analysis in support of the Ex post evaluation of FP6. WWTF – Vienna Science and Technology Fund.
Technopolis. 2009. Impact Europese kaderprogramma’s in Nederland. Brighton: Technopolis Group.
Technopolis. 2010. The impact of the EU RTD framework programme on the UK. Office of Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Additional information
Disclaimer All views expressed herein are entirely of the author, do not reflect the position of the European Institutions or bodies and do not, in any way, engage any of them.
Appendix: European Added Value – Why Fund Research at EU Level?
Appendix: European Added Value – Why Fund Research at EU Level?
EU support to research is provided only when it can be more effective than national funding. It does this through measures to coordinate national funding, and through implementing collaborative research and mobility actions.
Coordinated Funding and Agenda-Setting
EU initiatives help to coordinate funding across national borders and to restructure the R&D and innovation landscape in Europe:
The EU has created the European Research Council. Without it, the EU would have a landscape of compartmentalised national research councils, but no mechanism to promote EU-wide competition for funds and to encourage higher scientific quality.
Thanks to EU leadership, for the first time, a pan-European strategy on research infrastructures is now being implemented.
The EU helps private companies come together and implement joint strategic research agendas through tailored instruments, such as European Technology Platforms and Joint Technology Initiatives.
The EU joins up compartmentalised national research funding using instruments such as ERA-NETs and Article 185 initiatives, which set common agendas and achieve the funding scale required for tackling important societal challenges.
Through its Marie Curie actions, the EU set standards for innovative research training and career development and put in place a framework for the free movement of knowledge.
Coordinated funding reduces duplication and increases efficiency. EU support is vital – none of the above measures would have seen the light of day without an EU initiative.
Collaborative Research Projects and Mobility Actions
When it comes to implementing research and innovation projects, EU actions add value by stimulating transnational collaboration and mobility. These actions generate a series of benefits that could not be achieved by Member States acting alone:
Support for collaboration helps to achieve the critical mass required for breakthroughs when research activities are of such a scale and complexity that no single Member State can provide the necessary resources.
The EU supports research which addresses pan-European policy challenges (e.g. environment, health, food safety, climate change, security), and facilitates the establishment of a common scientific base and of harmonized laws in these areas.
Working in trans-national consortia helps firms to lower research risks, enabling certain research to take place. Involving key EU industry players and end users reduces commercial risks by aiding the development of standards and interoperable solutions, and by defragmenting existing markets.
Collaborative research projects involving end users enable the rapid and wide dissemination of results leading to better exploitation and a larger impact than would be possible only at Member State level.
SME involvement in research and innovation at EU level improves their partnerships with other companies and labs across Europe, and enables them to tap into Europe’s creative and innovative skills potential, to develop new products and services, and to enter new national, EU or international markets.
Companies can collaborate with foreign partners and end users at a scale not possible at national level, in projects tested for excellence and market impact, which induces them to invest more of their own funds than they would under national schemes.
Cross-border mobility and training actions are of critical importance for providing access to complementary knowledge, attracting young people into research, encouraging top researchers to come to Europe, ensuring excellent skills for future generations of scientists, and improving career prospects for researchers in both public and private sectors.
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Delanghe, H. (2018). European Union (EU) Research and Experimental Development (R&D) Policy. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2890
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2890
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences