Skip to main content

Roth, Alvin (Born 1951)

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

Roth is the major force in creating a vibrant field of matching theory and its application to market design. In doing so, he has discovered many properties of the stable matching problem (especially from the strategic viewpoint of game theory), studied real-life cases to test the relevance of the theory, conducted laboratory experiments (another field of study to which Roth made crucial contributions) and designed mechanisms in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • AbdulkadiroÄŸlu, A., and T. Sönmez. 2003. School choice: A mechanism design approach. American Economic Review 93: 729–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AbdulkadiroÄŸlu, A., P. Pathak, and A. Roth. 2005a. The New York City high school match. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 95: 364–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AbdulkadiroÄŸlu, A., P. Pathak, A. Roth, and T. Sönmez. 2005b. The Boston public school match. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 95: 368–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdulkadirog lu, A., P. Pathak, and A. Roth. 2009. Strategy-proofness versus efficiency in matching with indifferences: Redesigning the NYC high school match. American Economic Review 99: 1954–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashlagi, I., and A. Roth. 2011. New challenges in multihospital kidney exchange. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 102: 354–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashlagi, I., and A. Roth. 2012. Individual rationality and participation in large scale, multi-hospital kidney exchange. Cambridge, MA: Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashlagi, I., M. Braverman, and A. Hassidim. 2011. Stability in large matching markets with complementarities. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubins, L.E., and D.A. Freedman. 1981. Machiavelli and the Gale–Shapley algorithm. American Mathematical Monthly 88: 484–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erev, I., and A. Roth. 1998. Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. American Economic Review 88: 848–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, D., and L. Shapley. 1962. College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly 69: 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immorlica, N., and M. Mahdian. 2005. Marriage, honesty, and stability. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 53–62. New York: Association for Computing Machinery Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. 1876. Money and the mechanism of exchange. New York: D. Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J., and A. Roth (eds.). 1995. The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J. and A. Roth. 2000. The dynamics of reorganization in matching markets: A laboratory experiment motivated by a natural experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 201–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, F., and P. Pathak. 2009. Incentives and stability in large two-sided matching markets. American Economic Review 99: 608–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, F., P. Pathak, and A. Roth. 2009. Matching with couples. Cambridge, MA: Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1979. Axiomatic models of bargaining, Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems #170. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1982a. Incentive compatibility in a market with indivisible goods. Economics Letters 9: 12–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1982b. The economics of matching: Stability and incentives. Mathematics of Operations Research 7: 617–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1984. The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: A case study in game theory. Journal of Political Economy 92: 991–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1991. A natural experiment in the organization of entry-level labor markets: Regional markets for new physicians and surgeons in the United Kingdom. American Economic Review 81: 415–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 2003. The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70: 1341–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 2008a. What have we learned from market design? Hahn Lecture. Economic Journal, 118: 285–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 2008b. Deferred acceptance algorithms: History, theory, practice, and open questions. International Journal of Game Theory (Special Issue in Honor of David Gale on his 85th birthday), 36: 537–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 2013. Intellectual autobiography. Prepared by the Laureate to be posted at Nobel Organization’s website: http://www.nobelprize.org/

  • Roth, A. and I. Erev. 1995. Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior 8: 164–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. and M.K. Malouf. 1979. Game theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining. Psychological Review 86: 574–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., and J.K. Murnighan. 1978. Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 17: 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., and E. Peranson. 1999. The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: Some engineering aspects of economic design. American Economic Review 89: 748–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., and A. Postlewaite. 1977. Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods. Journal of Mathematical Economics 4: 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. and M. Sotomayor. 1990. Two-sided matching: A study in game-theoretic modeling and analysis, Econometric society monographs No. 18. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., V. Prasnikar, M. Okuno-Fujiwara, and S. Zamir. 1991. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review 81: 1068–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., T. Sönmez, and U. Ăœnver. 2004. Kidney exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119: 457–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., T. Sönmez, and U. Ăœnver. 2005a. Pairwise kidney exchange. Journal of Economic Theory 125: 151–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., T. Sönmez, and U. Ăœnver. 2005b. Kidney exchange clearinghouse in New England. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 95: 376–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., T. Sönmez, and U. Ăœnver. 2007. Efficient kidney exchange: Coincidence of wants in markets with compatibility-based preferences. American Economic Review 97: 828–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L., and H. Scarf. 1974. On cores and indivisibility. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1: 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slonin, R. and A. Roth. 1998. Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak republic. Econometrica 66: 569–596.

    Google Scholar 

Major Publications

  • Roth, A., and A. Postlewaite. 1977. Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods. Journal of Mathematical Economics 4: 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. and J.K. Murnighan. 1978. Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 17: 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1979. Axiomatic models of bargaining, Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems #170. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. and M.K. Malouf. 1979. Game theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining. Psychological Review 86: 574–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1982. Incentive compatibility in a market with indivisible goods. Economics Letters 9: 12–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1982. The economics of matching: Stability and incentives. Mathematics of Operations Research 7: 617–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1984. The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: A case study in game theory. Journal of Political Economy 92: 991–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1985. The college admission problem is not equivalent to the marriage problem. Journal of Economic Theory 36: 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. and M. Sotomayor. 1990. Two-sided matching: A study in game-theoretic modeling and analysis, Econometric society monographs No. 18. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 1991. A natural experiment in the organization of entry-level labor markets: Regional markets for new physicians and surgeons in the United Kingdom. American Economic Review 81: 415–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., V. Prasnikar, M. Okuno-Fujiwara, and S. Zamir. 1991. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review 81: 1068–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J., and A. Roth (eds.). 1995. The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., and Erev, I. 1995. Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior 8: 164–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erev,I. and A. Roth. 1998. Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. American Economic Review 88: 848–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slonin, R., and A. Roth. 1998. Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak republic. Econometrica 66: 569–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. and E. Peranson. 1999. The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: Some engineering aspects of economic design. American Economic Review 89: 748–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J. and A. Roth. 2000. The dynamics of reorganization in matching markets: A laboratory experiment motivated by a natural experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 201–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., and A. Ockenfels. 2002. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the Internet. American Economic Review 92: 1093–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. 2003. The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70: 1341–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., T. Sönmez, and U. Ăœnver. 2004. Kidney exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119: 457–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • AbdulkadiroÄŸlu, A., P. Pathak, and A. Roth. 2009. Strategy-proofness versus efficiency in matching with indifferences: Redesigning the NYC high school match. American Economic Review 99: 1954–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Al Roth and Fanqi Shi for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kojima, F. (2018). Roth, Alvin (Born 1951). In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2873

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics