Abstract
Academic and policy debates on aid effectiveness frequently emphasise the vulnerability of recipients to the Dutch Disease, through which aid inflows appreciate the real exchange rate, thereby taxing the tradable export sector with potentially deleterious effects on growth. Fear of the Dutch Disease is remarkably pervasive, even though there is little decisive evidence that aid-induced Dutch Disease effects are either large or widespread amongst poor countries, at least against most plausible counterfactuals. The lack of strong evidence reflects a variety of factors, including problems of measurement, but is primarily due to the fact that aid flows are often purposive – designed to address pre-existing distortions in the recipient economy – and are accompanied by policy measures specifically designed to mitigate latent Dutch Disease effects. Although the conventional macroeconomic transmission channels may therefore be weak, the language of the Dutch Disease continues to be used as a metaphor for the wide range of political economy concerns associated with aid surges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Traded goods, consisting of importables and exportables are those goods produced and consumed in world markets. Domestic demand and supply conditions therefore have no impact on the (world) price of tradables. Non-tradable or domestic goods, on the other hand are only produced locally; their price is determined by domestic market conditions. By definition, donor aid can only consist of traded goods (e.g. food aid) or a claim over traded goods (i.e. a dollar flow of aid).
- 2.
On the link between aid and (legal and illegal) capital flight see Ndikumana and Boyce (2003).
- 3.
If aid flows are temporary a high rate of (official) saving may be consistent with efficient expenditure smoothing. But see Buffie et al. (2010) on how ‘use it or lose it’ constraints on aid flows affect recipients’ monetary and fiscal policy choices.
- 4.
These are, of course, relative growth rates; without controlling for the relative size of sectors it is not possible to infer the impact on aggregate output growth.
- 5.
Bibliography
Adam, C., and D. Bevan. 2006. Aid and the supply side: Public investment, export performance and the Dutch Disease in low-income countries. World Bank Economic Review 20(2): 261–290.
Adam, C., E. Buffie, S. O’Connell, and C. Pattillo. 2009. Monetary policy rules for managing aid surges in Africa. Review of Development Economics 13(3): 464–490.
Agénor, P., N. Bayraktar, and K. El Aynaoui. 2008. Roads out of poverty? Assessing the links between aid, public investment, growth and poverty reduction. Journal of Development Economics 86(2): 277–295.
Arellano, C., A. Bulíř, T. Lane, and L. Lipschitz. 2009. The dynamic implications of foreign aid and its variability. Journal of Development Economics 88(1): 87–102.
Bauer, P.T. 1972. Dissent on development. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Beaudry, P. 2008. Growth and learning-by-doing. The new palgrave dictionary of economics. 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Berg, A., Aiyar, S., Hussain, M., Roache, S., Mirzoev, T. and Mahone, A. 2007. The macroeconomics of scaling up aid: Lessons from recent experience. IMF Occasional Paper No. 253.
Berg, A., Gottschalk, J., Portillo, R. and Zanna, L.-F. 2010. The macroeconomics of medium-term aid scaling up scenarios. IMF Working Paper 10/160.
Bevan, D. 2006. An analytical overview of aid absorption. In The macroeconomic management of foreign aid: Opportunities and pitfalls, ed. P. Isard, L. Lipschitz, A. Mourmouras, and B. Yontcheva. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Brautigam, D., and S. Knack. 2004. Foreign aid, institutions, and governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change 52(2): 255–286.
Brock, P. 2008. Transfer problem. The new palgrave dictionary of economics. 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Buffie, E., S. O’Connell, and C. Adam. 2010. Fiscal inertia, donor credibility and the monetary management of aid surges. Journal of Development Economics 93(2): 287–298.
Bulíř, A., and J. Hamann. 2008. Volatility of development aid: From the frying pan into the fire. World Development 36(10): 2048–2066.
Clerides, S., S. Lach, and J. Tybout. 1998. Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(3): 903–947.
Dorn, J. A. 2008. Peter Bauer. The new palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Eifert, B. and Gelb, A. 2005. Improving the dynamics of aid: Toward more predictable budget support. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3732.
Elbadawi, I., L. Kaltani, and R. Soto. 2012. Aid, real exchange rate misalignment and economic performance in Sub Saharan Africa. World Development 40(4): 681–700.
Fielding, D., and F. Gibson. 2013. Aid and Dutch disease in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies 22(1): 1–21.
Ghosh, A., A.-M. Gulde, and H. Wolf. 2003. Exchange rate regimes: Choices and consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gollin, D. and Rogerson, R. 2010. Agriculture, roads and economic development in Uganda. NBER Working Paper 15863.
Gylfason, T. 2008. Dutch disease. The new palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Heller, P. S. 2005. Pity the finance minister: Issues in managing a substantial scaling up of aid flows. IMF Working Paper 05/180.
Kang, J., A. Prati, and A. Rebucci. 2012. Aid, exports and growth: A time series perspective on the Dutch Disease hypothesis. Review of Economics and Institutions 3(2).
Klein, M., and T. Harford. 2005. The market for aid. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Magud, N. and Sosa, S. 2010. When and why worry about real exchange rate appreciation: The missing link between Dutch Disease and growth. IMF Working Paper 10/271.
Martins, P., and Y. Yang. 2009. The impact of exporting on firm productivity: A metaanalysis of the learning-by-doing hypothesis. Review of World Economics 145(3): 431–445.
Ndikumana, L., and J.K. Boyce. 2003. Public debts and private assets: Explaining capital flight from Sub-Saharan African countries. World Development 31(1): 107–130.
Nkusu, M. 2004. Aid and the Dutch Disease in low income countries: Informed diagnosis for prudent prognosis. IMF Working Paper 04/49.
Rajan, R., and S. Subramanian. 2011. Aid, Dutch Disease and manufacturing growth. Journal of Development Economics 94(1): 106–118.
Tarp, F. 2008. Foreign aid. The new palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Tokarick, S. 2008. Welfare-worsening aid flows to small countries: The role of non-traded goods. Review of Development Economics 12(4): 818–827.
Torvik, R. 2001. Learning-by-doing and the Dutch Disease. European Economic Review 5: 285–306.
Van Wijnbergen, S. 1984. The ‘Dutch Disease’: A disease after all? Economic Journal 84(373): 41–55.
Werker, E., F. Ahmed, and C. Cohen. 2009. How is foreign aid spent? Evidence from a natural experiment. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1(2): 225–244.
Yano, M., and J. Nugent. 1999. Aid, nontraded goods and the transfer paradox in small countries. American Economic Review 89(3): 431–449.
Younger, S. 1992. Aid and the Dutch Disease: Macroeconomic management when everybody loves you. World Development 20(11): 1587–1597.
Acknowledgments
I thank Radhika Goyal for excellent research assistance and the Oppenheimer Fund of the Department of International Development, University of Oxford for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Adam, C. (2018). Dutch Disease and Foreign Aid. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2864
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2864
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences