The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Dutch Disease and Foreign Aid

  • Christopher Adam
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2864

Abstract

Academic and policy debates on aid effectiveness frequently emphasise the vulnerability of recipients to the Dutch Disease, through which aid inflows appreciate the real exchange rate, thereby taxing the tradable export sector with potentially deleterious effects on growth. Fear of the Dutch Disease is remarkably pervasive, even though there is little decisive evidence that aid-induced Dutch Disease effects are either large or widespread amongst poor countries, at least against most plausible counterfactuals. The lack of strong evidence reflects a variety of factors, including problems of measurement, but is primarily due to the fact that aid flows are often purposive – designed to address pre-existing distortions in the recipient economy – and are accompanied by policy measures specifically designed to mitigate latent Dutch Disease effects. Although the conventional macroeconomic transmission channels may therefore be weak, the language of the Dutch Disease continues to be used as a metaphor for the wide range of political economy concerns associated with aid surges.

Keywords

Aid absorption Dutch disease Export growth Foreign aid Political economy Real exchange rate appreciation Transfer paradox 

JEL Classifications

F21 F23 F43 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Radhika Goyal for excellent research assistance and the Oppenheimer Fund of the Department of International Development, University of Oxford for financial support.

Bibliography

  1. Adam, C., and D. Bevan. 2006. Aid and the supply side: Public investment, export performance and the Dutch Disease in low-income countries. World Bank Economic Review 20(2): 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam, C., E. Buffie, S. O’Connell, and C. Pattillo. 2009. Monetary policy rules for managing aid surges in Africa. Review of Development Economics 13(3): 464–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agénor, P., N. Bayraktar, and K. El Aynaoui. 2008. Roads out of poverty? Assessing the links between aid, public investment, growth and poverty reduction. Journal of Development Economics 86(2): 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano, C., A. Bulíř, T. Lane, and L. Lipschitz. 2009. The dynamic implications of foreign aid and its variability. Journal of Development Economics 88(1): 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer, P.T. 1972. Dissent on development. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beaudry, P. 2008. Growth and learning-by-doing. The new palgrave dictionary of economics. 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, A., Aiyar, S., Hussain, M., Roache, S., Mirzoev, T. and Mahone, A. 2007. The macroeconomics of scaling up aid: Lessons from recent experience. IMF Occasional Paper No. 253.Google Scholar
  8. Berg, A., Gottschalk, J., Portillo, R. and Zanna, L.-F. 2010. The macroeconomics of medium-term aid scaling up scenarios. IMF Working Paper 10/160.Google Scholar
  9. Bevan, D. 2006. An analytical overview of aid absorption. In The macroeconomic management of foreign aid: Opportunities and pitfalls, ed. P. Isard, L. Lipschitz, A. Mourmouras, and B. Yontcheva. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  10. Brautigam, D., and S. Knack. 2004. Foreign aid, institutions, and governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change 52(2): 255–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brock, P. 2008. Transfer problem. The new palgrave dictionary of economics. 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  12. Buffie, E., S. O’Connell, and C. Adam. 2010. Fiscal inertia, donor credibility and the monetary management of aid surges. Journal of Development Economics 93(2): 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bulíř, A., and J. Hamann. 2008. Volatility of development aid: From the frying pan into the fire. World Development 36(10): 2048–2066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clerides, S., S. Lach, and J. Tybout. 1998. Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(3): 903–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorn, J. A. 2008. Peter Bauer. The new palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  16. Eifert, B. and Gelb, A. 2005. Improving the dynamics of aid: Toward more predictable budget support. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3732.Google Scholar
  17. Elbadawi, I., L. Kaltani, and R. Soto. 2012. Aid, real exchange rate misalignment and economic performance in Sub Saharan Africa. World Development 40(4): 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fielding, D., and F. Gibson. 2013. Aid and Dutch disease in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies 22(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghosh, A., A.-M. Gulde, and H. Wolf. 2003. Exchange rate regimes: Choices and consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gollin, D. and Rogerson, R. 2010. Agriculture, roads and economic development in Uganda. NBER Working Paper 15863.Google Scholar
  21. Gylfason, T. 2008. Dutch disease. The new palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  22. Heller, P. S. 2005. Pity the finance minister: Issues in managing a substantial scaling up of aid flows. IMF Working Paper 05/180.Google Scholar
  23. Kang, J., A. Prati, and A. Rebucci. 2012. Aid, exports and growth: A time series perspective on the Dutch Disease hypothesis. Review of Economics and Institutions 3(2).Google Scholar
  24. Klein, M., and T. Harford. 2005. The market for aid. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Magud, N. and Sosa, S. 2010. When and why worry about real exchange rate appreciation: The missing link between Dutch Disease and growth. IMF Working Paper 10/271.Google Scholar
  26. Martins, P., and Y. Yang. 2009. The impact of exporting on firm productivity: A metaanalysis of the learning-by-doing hypothesis. Review of World Economics 145(3): 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ndikumana, L., and J.K. Boyce. 2003. Public debts and private assets: Explaining capital flight from Sub-Saharan African countries. World Development 31(1): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nkusu, M. 2004. Aid and the Dutch Disease in low income countries: Informed diagnosis for prudent prognosis. IMF Working Paper 04/49.Google Scholar
  29. Rajan, R., and S. Subramanian. 2011. Aid, Dutch Disease and manufacturing growth. Journal of Development Economics 94(1): 106–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tarp, F. 2008. Foreign aid. The new palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  31. Tokarick, S. 2008. Welfare-worsening aid flows to small countries: The role of non-traded goods. Review of Development Economics 12(4): 818–827.Google Scholar
  32. Torvik, R. 2001. Learning-by-doing and the Dutch Disease. European Economic Review 5: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Wijnbergen, S. 1984. The ‘Dutch Disease’: A disease after all? Economic Journal 84(373): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Werker, E., F. Ahmed, and C. Cohen. 2009. How is foreign aid spent? Evidence from a natural experiment. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1(2): 225–244.Google Scholar
  35. Yano, M., and J. Nugent. 1999. Aid, nontraded goods and the transfer paradox in small countries. American Economic Review 89(3): 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Younger, S. 1992. Aid and the Dutch Disease: Macroeconomic management when everybody loves you. World Development 20(11): 1587–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Adam
    • 1
  1. 1.