The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Rationality, History of the Concept

  • Esther-Mirjam Sent
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2834

Abstract

This article offers a historical and methodological perspective on the concept of rationality. It gives an overview of the various interpretations of the notion, from self-interest to rational choice and expected utility to strategic rationality and rational expectations. It pays special attention to the ethical dimensions of the concept. The article further places rationality within a long-ranging discussion concerning the status of assumptions within economics. It explicitly considers efforts to test rationality directly. The article concludes with an evaluation of recent efforts to replace rationality with the notion of bounded rationality.

Keywords

Adaptive control learning Adaptive expectations Arrow’s theorem Assumptions Bayes’ rule Bayesian learning Behavioural economics Bounded rationality Cairnes, J. E. Centipede game Chain store paradox Commitment Completeness of preferences Computation of equilibria Confirmation Error-term justification Ethics and economics Expected utility Falsificationism Folk theorem Friedman, M. Fundamental theorems of welfare economics Game theory Hutchison, T. Instrumental rationality Introspection Keynes, J. N. Learning Machlup, F. Microfoundations Multiple equilibria Muth, J. F. Nash equilibrium Nash program Neoclassical economics Neural network learning New behavioural economics Notrade theorems Perfect equilibrium Pluralism in economics Power Preference satisfaction Preferences Prisoner’s Dilemma Procedural and substantive rationality Rational behaviour Rational expectations Rationality Regret Repeated games Robbins, L. C. Satisficing Self-interest Senior, N. W. Simon, H. Social norms Strategic behaviour Subjective probability Sure-thing axioms Sympathy Testing Transitivity Verification Well-being 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Alchian, A.A. 1950. Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 58: 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow, K.J. 1987. Economic theory and the hypothesis of rationality. In The New Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, vol. 1, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Aumann, R.J. 1997. Rationality and bounded rationality. Games and Economic Behavior 21: 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aumann, R.J., and S. Sorin. 1989. Cooperation and bounded recall. Games and Economic Behavior 1: 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G.S. 1962. Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 70: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blaug, M. 1992. The methodology of economics: Or, how economists explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowles, S. 1991. What markets can – And cannot – Do. Challenge 34(4): 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bray, M., and D. Kreps. 1987. Rational learning and rational expectations. In Arrow and the ascent of modern economic theory, ed. G. Feiwel. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brunswik, E. 1955. In defense of probabilistic functionalism: A reply. Psychological Review 62: 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldwell, B.J. 1994. Beyond positivism: Economic methodology in the twentieth century. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daston, L. 1983. Rational individuals versus laws of society. In Probability since 1800, ed. M. Heidelberger, L. Krüger, and R. Rheinwald. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  12. Elster, J. 1989. Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedman, M. 1953. The methodology of positive economics. Reprinted in Hausman (1984).Google Scholar
  14. Gauthier, D. 1991. Morals by agreement. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gigerenzer, G., and P.M. Todd. 1999. Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In Simple heuristics That make us smart, ed. G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, and A.R. Group. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hausman, D. (ed.). 1984. The philosophy of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hausman, D., and M. McPherson. 1984. Economics, rationality, and ethics. In Hausman (1984).Google Scholar
  18. Hutchison, T.W. 1956. On verification in economics. Reprinted in Hausman (1984).Google Scholar
  19. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirzner, I.M. 1962. Rational action and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 70: 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knight, F.H. 1925. Fact and metaphysics in economic psychology. American Economic Review 15: 247–266.Google Scholar
  22. Machlup, F. 1956. On indirect verification. Reprinted in Hausman (1984).Google Scholar
  23. Mill, J.S. 1836. On the definition and method of political economy. Reprinted in Hausman (1984).Google Scholar
  24. Muth, J.F. 1961. Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29: 315–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neumann, J. von., and O. Morgenstern. 1944/1955. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Peterson, C.R., and L.R. Beach. 1967. Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin 68: 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robbins, L. 1935. The nature and significance of economic science. Reprinted in Hausman (1984).Google Scholar
  28. Rubinstein, A. 1998. Modeling bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Samuelson, P.A. 1947. Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sargent, T.J. 1981. Interpreting economic time series. Journal of Political Economy 89: 213–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sargent, T.J. 1984. Autoregressions, expectations, and advice (with discussion). American Economic Review 74: 408–421.Google Scholar
  32. Sargent, T.J. 1993. Bounded rationality in macroeconomics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Savage, L.J. 1954. The foundations of statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  34. Sen, A. 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 317–344.Google Scholar
  35. Sen, A. 1987. Rational behavior. In The New Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, vol. 4, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Sent, E.M. 1997. The evolving rationality of rational expectations: An assessment of Thomas Sargent’s achievements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sent, E.M. 2004a. The legacy of Herbert Simon in game theory. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 53: 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sent, E.M. 2004b. Behavioral economics: How psychology made its (limited) way back into economics. History of Political Economy 36: 735–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simon, H.A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simon, H.A. 1976. From substantive to procedural rationality. In Method and appraisal in economics, ed. S. Latsis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Simon, H.A. 1963. Testability and approximation. Reprinted in Hausman (1984).Google Scholar
  42. Smith, V. 1991. Rational choice. Journal of Political Economy 99: 877–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, V. 1992. Game theory and experimental economics. In Toward a history of game theory, ed. E.R. Weintraub. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sugden, R. 1991. Rational choice: A survey. Economic Journal 101: 751–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suppes, P. 1961. The philosophical relevance of decision theory. Journal of Philosophy 58: 605–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tisdell, C. 1975. Concepts of rationality in economics. Philosophy of Social Science 5: 259–272.Google Scholar
  47. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1971. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin 76: 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Varian, H.R. 1987. Differences of opinion in financial markets. In Financial risk: Theory, evidence, and implications, Proceedings of the 11th annual economic policy conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.Google Scholar
  49. Weber, M. 1904/1999. The area of economics, economic theory, and the ideal type. In Essays in economic sociology, ed. M. Weber. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  50. Winter, S.G. 1964. Economic ‘natural selection’ and the theory of the firm. Yale Economic Essays 4: 225–272.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esther-Mirjam Sent
    • 1
  1. 1.