Skip to main content

Classical Economics and Economic Growth

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

The classical economists dealt with many of the issues now addressed by modern growth theories, albeit with different theoretical tools and with different perspectives. Classical analyses of the division of labour, population growth, and the difficulties when factors are in fixed supply, continue to have modern applications. However, the models they developed ran into difficulties after the ‘marginalist revolution’, when it became apparent that sustained technical change, abstinence and thrift by the labouring classes, and factor substitution might forestall the arrival of the stationary state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aghion, P., and S. Durlauf. 2005. Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. 2001. The great divergence in European wages and prices from the Middle Ages to the First World War. Explorations in Economic History 38: 411–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, A., and D. Harris. 1987. The complex dynamics of the simple Ricardian system. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 893–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, A. 1997. Luxury and economic development: David Hume and Adam Smith. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 45: 78–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brezis, E., and W. Young. 2003. The new views on demographic transition: A reassessment of Malthus’s and Marx’s approach to population. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 10: 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glyn, A. 2004. The corn model, gluts and surplus value. Working Paper No. 194, Department of Economics, Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glyn, A. 2006. Will Marx be proved right? Oxonomics 1: 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, C. 2005. Why does market capitalism fail to deliver a sustainable environment and greater equality of incomes? Cambridge Journal of Economics 29: 1091–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, K. 2003. Growth theory and industrial revolutions in Britain and America. Canadian Journal of Economics 36: 809–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, S. 1995. Collected essays I: Ricardo. The ‘new view’. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. 2005. Growth and ideas. In Aghion and Durlauf (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonung, L. 1981. Ricardo on machinery and the present unemployment: An unpublished manuscript by Knut Wicksell. Economic Journal 91: 195–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1956. Alternatives theories of distribution. Review of Economic Studies 28: 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, T.R. 1798/1999. An essay on the principle of population. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. 1848/1985. Principles of political economy, with some of their applications to social philosophy. London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. 2005. Long-term economic growth and the history of technology. In Aghion and Durlauf (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. 1960. A mathematical formulation of the Ricardian system. Review of Economic Studies 27: 78–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. 1978. The canonical classical model of political economy. Journal of Economic Literature 16: 1415–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. 1988. Mathematical vindication of Ricardo on machinery. Journal of Political Economy 96: 274–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1776/1976. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. 2005. Introduction: Growth in retrospect and prospect. In Aghion and Durlauf (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities: Prelude to a critique of economic theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. 1958. Ricardo and the 93% labor theory of value. American Economic Review 48: 357–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, P. 1942. The theory of capitalist development. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank Robert Allen, Julia Cartwright, Mary Dixon-Woods, Marcel Fafchamps, Nicholas Fawcett, Andrew Glyn, Mark Koyama, Silvia Palano, and Jonathan Temple for helpful comments on a preliminary draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cameron, G. (2018). Classical Economics and Economic Growth. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2833

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics