Abstract
The classical economists dealt with many of the issues now addressed by modern growth theories, albeit with different theoretical tools and with different perspectives. Classical analyses of the division of labour, population growth, and the difficulties when factors are in fixed supply, continue to have modern applications. However, the models they developed ran into difficulties after the ‘marginalist revolution’, when it became apparent that sustained technical change, abstinence and thrift by the labouring classes, and factor substitution might forestall the arrival of the stationary state.
Keywords
- Balanced growth
- Capital accumulation
- Classical economics
- Classical economics and economic growth
- Diminishing returns
- Distribution theory
- Division of labour
- Economic growth
- Falling rate of profit
- Fertility
- Human capital
- Industrial Revolution
- Labour supply
- Luxury
- Malthus, T. R.
- Marginalist revolution
- Marx, K.H.
- Mill, J. S.
- Mortality
- Population growth
- Productive and unproductive labour
- Ricardo, D.
- Say, J.-B.
- Smith, A.
- Stationary state
- Technical change
- Value theory
JEL Classification
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Aghion, P., and S. Durlauf. 2005. Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Allen, R. 2001. The great divergence in European wages and prices from the Middle Ages to the First World War. Explorations in Economic History 38: 411–447.
Bhaduri, A., and D. Harris. 1987. The complex dynamics of the simple Ricardian system. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 893–902.
Brewer, A. 1997. Luxury and economic development: David Hume and Adam Smith. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 45: 78–98.
Brezis, E., and W. Young. 2003. The new views on demographic transition: A reassessment of Malthus’s and Marx’s approach to population. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 10: 25–45.
Glyn, A. 2004. The corn model, gluts and surplus value. Working Paper No. 194, Department of Economics, Oxford University.
Glyn, A. 2006. Will Marx be proved right? Oxonomics 1: 13–16.
Greenhalgh, C. 2005. Why does market capitalism fail to deliver a sustainable environment and greater equality of incomes? Cambridge Journal of Economics 29: 1091–1109.
Harley, K. 2003. Growth theory and industrial revolutions in Britain and America. Canadian Journal of Economics 36: 809–831.
Hollander, S. 1995. Collected essays I: Ricardo. The ‘new view’. London: Routledge.
Jones, C. 2005. Growth and ideas. In Aghion and Durlauf (2005).
Jonung, L. 1981. Ricardo on machinery and the present unemployment: An unpublished manuscript by Knut Wicksell. Economic Journal 91: 195–198.
Kaldor, N. 1956. Alternatives theories of distribution. Review of Economic Studies 28: 83–100.
Malthus, T.R. 1798/1999. An essay on the principle of population. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics.
Mill, J.S. 1848/1985. Principles of political economy, with some of their applications to social philosophy. London: Penguin Classics.
Mokyr, J. 2005. Long-term economic growth and the history of technology. In Aghion and Durlauf (2005).
Pasinetti, L. 1960. A mathematical formulation of the Ricardian system. Review of Economic Studies 27: 78–98.
Samuelson, P. 1978. The canonical classical model of political economy. Journal of Economic Literature 16: 1415–1434.
Samuelson, P. 1988. Mathematical vindication of Ricardo on machinery. Journal of Political Economy 96: 274–282.
Smith, A. 1776/1976. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Solow, R. 2005. Introduction: Growth in retrospect and prospect. In Aghion and Durlauf (2005).
Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities: Prelude to a critique of economic theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stigler, G. 1958. Ricardo and the 93% labor theory of value. American Economic Review 48: 357–367.
Sweezy, P. 1942. The theory of capitalist development. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Acknowledgment
The author would like to thank Robert Allen, Julia Cartwright, Mary Dixon-Woods, Marcel Fafchamps, Nicholas Fawcett, Andrew Glyn, Mark Koyama, Silvia Palano, and Jonathan Temple for helpful comments on a preliminary draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cameron, G. (2018). Classical Economics and Economic Growth. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2833
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2833
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences