Skip to main content

Default and Enforcement Constraints

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

This article illustrates when limited enforcement of contracts induces enforcement constraints (limits to intertemporal exchange) or default (the breaking of intertemporal promises with the associated punishment), and sheds light on how enforcement policies should be related to the observed frequency of default. When limited enforcement is the only friction equilibrium default is never observed, yet tightening enforcement of contracts is socially beneficial. When limited enforcement coexists with other frictions, default occurs in equilibrium but tightening enforcement might be socially undesirable. The reason is that equilibrium default, although detrimental to intertemporal exchange, might lead to improved allocation of resources across states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alvarez, F., and U. Jermann. 2000. Efficiency, equilibrium, and asset pricing with risk of default. Econometrica 68: 775–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, P., J. Geanakoplos, and M. Shubik. 2005. Default and punishment in general equilibrium. Econometrica 73: 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, T., and D. Levine. 1993. Debt-constrained asset markets. Review of Economic Studies 60: 865–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, P., and F. Perri. 2002. International business cycles with endogenous incomplete markets. Econometrica 70: 907–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocherlakota, N. 1996. Implications of efficient risk sharing without commitment. Review of Economic Studies 63: 595–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, D., and F. Perri. 2006. Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality? Evidence and theory. Review of Economic Studies 73: 163–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zame, W. 1993. Efficiency and the role of default when securities markets are incomplete. American Economic Review 83: 1142–1164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Perri, F. (2018). Default and Enforcement Constraints. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2825

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics