The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Collective Choice Experiments

  • Rick K. Wilson
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2820

Abstract

Collective choice experiments examine voting mechanisms that aggregate individual preferences. Two general topics have received the most attention. The first pertains to agents deciding on a single collective outcome or policy. The second topic covers election mechanisms that govern candidates and voters.

Keywords

Agenda control Arrows Theorem Collective choice experiments Electoral mechanisms Median voter Social choice Spatial committee experiments 

JEL Classifications

C9 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Arrow, K.J. 1963. Social choice and individual values. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berl, J.E., R.D. McKelvey, P.C. Ordeshook, and M. D. Winer. 1976. An experimental test of the core in a simple n-person cooperative nonsidepayment game. Journal of Conflict Resolution 20: 453–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bianco, W.T., M.S. Lynch, G.J. Miller, and I. Sened. 2006. ‘A theory waiting to be discovered and used’: A reanalysis of canonical experiments on majority rule decision making. Journal of Politics 68: 837–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, D. 1948. On the rationale of group decision making. Journal of Political Economy 56: 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan, J., and G. Tullock. 1962. Calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, G.W. 1997. Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, O.A., and M.J. Hinich. 1966. A mathematical model of policy formation in a democratic society. In Mathematical applications in political science, ed. J.L. Bernd. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University.Google Scholar
  8. Fiorina, M.P., and C.R. Plott. 1978. Committee decisions under majority rule: an experimental study. American Political Science Review 72: 575–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frechette, G., J.H. Kagel, and J.H. Lehrer. 2003. Bargaining in legislatures: An experimental investigation of open versus closed amendment rules. American Political Science Review 97: 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerber, E.R., R.B. Morton, and T.A. Rietz. 1998. Minority representation in multimember districts. American Political Science Review 92: 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haney, P., R. Herzberg, and R.K. Wilson. 1992. Advice and consent: Unitary actors, advisory models and experimental tests. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 603–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laing, J.D., and S. Olmsted. 1978. An experimental and game theoretic study of committees. In Game Theory and Political Science, ed. P.C. Ordeshook. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Laing, J.D., and B. Slotznick. 1983. Winners, blockers, and the status quo: Simple collective decision games and the core. Public Choice 40: 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lupia, A., and M.D. McCubbins. 1998. The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. McKelvey, R.D., and P.C. Ordeshook. 1985. Sequential elections with limited information. American Journal of Political Science 29: 480–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McKelvey, R.D., P.C. Ordeshook, and M.D. Winer. 1978. The competitive solution for n-person games without transferable utility with an application to competitive games. American Political Science Review 72: 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morton, R.B. 1993. Incomplete information and ideological explanations of platform divergence. American Political Science Review 87: 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morton, R.B., and K.C. Williams. 2001. Learning by voting: Sequential choices in presidential primaries and other elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Plott, C.R. 1967. A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review 57: 787–806.Google Scholar
  20. Plott, C.R., and M.E. Levine. 1978. A model of agenda influence on committee decisions. American Economic Review 68: 146–160.Google Scholar
  21. Schofield, N. 1985. Social Choice and Democracy. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson, R.K., and R.Q. Herzberg. 1987. Negative decision powers and institutional equilibrium: Experiments on blocking coalitions. The Western Political Quarterly 40: 593–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rick K. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.