The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Collective Models of the Household

  • Olivier Donni
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2802

Abstract

Collective models of the household are based on two fundamental assumptions: (a) each agent is characterized by specific preferences and (b) the decision process results in Pareto-efficient outcomes. The main results of the theory of collective models then refer to the empirical issue of deriving testable restrictions on household behaviour and recovering from this some information on the structural model that can be used to carry out welfare comparisons at the individual level.

Keywords

Collective models of the household Exclusive goods Household behaviour Indirect utility function Pareto efficiency 

JEL Classifications

D11 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Apps, P., and R. Rees. 1997. Collective labor supply and household production. Journal of Political Economy 105: 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blundell, R., P.-A. Chiappori, and C. Meghir. 2005. Collective labor supply with children. Journal of Political Economy 113: 1277–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., and P.-A. Chiappori. 1995. The collective approach to household behaviour. Working Paper. Paris: DELTA.Google Scholar
  4. Bourguignon, F., M. Browning, P.-A. Chiappori, and V. Lechene. 1993. Intrahousehold allocation of consumption: A model and some evidence from French data. Annales d’économie et de statistique 29: 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browning, M., and P.-A. Chiappori. 1998. Efficient intrahousehold allocations: A general characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica 66: 1241–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiappori, P.-A. 1988. Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56: 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiappori, P.-A. 1992. Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy 100: 437–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiappori, P.-A. 1997. Introducing household production in collective models of labor supply. Journal of Political Economy 105: 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiappori, P.-A., and I. Ekeland. 2003. The micro economics of group behavior: Identification. Working paper. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Chiappori, P.-A., and I. Ekeland 2006. Characterizing group behavior. Journal of Economic Theory (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  11. Chiappori, P.-A., B. Fortin, and G. Lacroix. 2002. Marriage market, divorce legislation, and household labor supply. Journal of Political Economy 110: 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donni, O. 2003. Collective household labor supply: Non-participation and income taxation. Journal of Public Economics 87: 1179–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donni, O. 2004. The intrahousehold allocation of private and public consumption:Theory and some evidence from U.S. data. Working paper. Cergy-Pontoise: University of Cergy-Pontoise.Google Scholar
  14. Donni, O. 2006. Collective consumption and welfare. Canadian Journal of Economics 39: 124–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fong, Y., and J. Zhang. 2001. The identification of unobservable independent and spousal leisure. Journal of Political Economy 109: 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leuthold, J. 1968. An empirical study of formula transfers and the work decision of the poor. Journal of Human Resources 1: 312–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manser, M., and M. Brown. 1980. Marriage and household decision making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review 21: 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mazzocco, M. 2005. Household intertemporal behavior: a collective characterization and empirical tests. Working paper. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  19. McElroy, M., and M. Horney. 1981. Nash bargained household decisions. International Economic Review 22: 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Donni
    • 1
  1. 1.