Abstract
We review the psychological processes underpinning network formation and network-based processes, focusing first on the nature of relationships and their formation, and then on the consequences of networks for individual outcomes and behavior. We argue that it is important to develop methodological approaches that allow us to regard these processes as hypotheses to be tested rather than as unquestioned assumptions. We suggest that different types of networks and processes are likely to lead to different conclusions about these hypotheses, and that the development of models for networks and network processes should therefore be grounded in careful empirical analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Anderson, S., and S. Chen. 2002. The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review 109: 619–645.
Baldwin, M. 1992. Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin 112: 461–484.
Besag, J. 1974. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 36: 96–127.
Burt, R. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349–399.
Cook, K., and J. Whitmeyer. 1992. Two approaches to social structure – exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology 18: 109–127.
Feld, S. 1981. The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 86: 1015–1035.
Fiske, A. 2004. Relational models theory 2.0. In Relational models theory: A contemporary overview, ed. N. Haslam. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Frank, O., and D. Strauss. 1986. Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 832–842.
Friedkin, N. 1998. A structural theory of social influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goodreau, S. 2007. Advances in exponential random graph (p*) models to a large social network. Social Networks 29: 231–248.
Granovetter, M. 1982. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Social structure and network analysis, ed. P. Marsden and N. Lin. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Haslam, N. 2004. Four grammars for primate social relations. In Evolutionary social psychology, ed. J. Simpson and D. Kenrick. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Holmes, J. 2000. Social relationships: The nature and function of relational schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology 30: 447–496.
Jackson, M. 2005. A survey of models of network formation: Stability and efficiency. In Group formation in economics: Networks, clubs and coalitions, ed. G. Demange and M. Wooders. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kumbasar, E., A. Romney, and W. Batchelder. 1994. Systematic biases in social perception. American Journal of Sociology 100: 477–505.
Lomi, A., and P. Pattison. 2006. Manufacturing relations: An empirical study of the organization of production across multiple networks. Organization Science 17: 313–332.
Lyons, A., and Y. Kashima. 2003. How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 989–1005.
McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.
Padgett, J., and C. Ansell. 1993. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1259–1319.
Padgett, J., and P. McLean. 2006. Organizational invention and elite transformation: The birth of partnership systems in renaissance Florence. American Journal of Sociology 111: 1463–1568.
Pattison, P. 1994. Social cognition in context: Some applications of social network analysis. In Advances in social network analysis in the social and behavioral sciences, ed. S. Wasserman and J. Galaskiewicz. Newbury Park: Sage.
Pattison, P., and G. Robins. 2002. Neighbourhood-based models for social networks. Sociological Methodology 32: 300–337.
Robins, G., and J. Boldero. 2003. Relational discrepancy theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7: 56–74.
Robins, G., P. Pattison, and P. Elliott. 2001. Network models for social influence processes. Psychometrika 66: 161–190.
Robins, G., T. Snijders, P. Wang, M. Handcock, and P. Pattison. 2006. Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 29: 192–215.
Snijders, T. 2001. The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In Sociological methodology 2001, ed. M. Sobel and M. Becker. Boston/London: Basil Blackwell.
Snijders, T., C. Steglich, and M. Schweinberger. 2006a. Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences, ed. K. van Montfort, H. Oud, and A. Satorra. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Snijders, T., P. Pattison, G. Robins, and M. Handcock. 2006b. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology 36: 99–153.
White, H., S. Boorman, and R. Breiger. 1976. Social structure from multiple networks: I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology 87: 517–547.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pattison, P., Robins, G., Kashima, Y. (2018). Psychology of Social Networks. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2790
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2790
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences