The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Psychology of Social Networks

  • Philippa Pattison
  • Garry Robins
  • Yoshi Kashima
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2790

Abstract

We review the psychological processes underpinning network formation and network-based processes, focusing first on the nature of relationships and their formation, and then on the consequences of networks for individual outcomes and behavior. We argue that it is important to develop methodological approaches that allow us to regard these processes as hypotheses to be tested rather than as unquestioned assumptions. We suggest that different types of networks and processes are likely to lead to different conclusions about these hypotheses, and that the development of models for networks and network processes should therefore be grounded in careful empirical analysis.

Keywords

Social networks Psychology of Network formation Network models Network ties Relational models Relational schemas Social roles Tie interdependencies Exponential random graph models 

JEL Classifications

D85 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, S., and S. Chen. 2002. The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review 109: 619–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, M. 1992. Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin 112: 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Besag, J. 1974. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 36: 96–127.Google Scholar
  4. Burt, R. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, K., and J. Whitmeyer. 1992. Two approaches to social structure – exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology 18: 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feld, S. 1981. The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 86: 1015–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fiske, A. 2004. Relational models theory 2.0. In Relational models theory: A contemporary overview, ed. N. Haslam. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Frank, O., and D. Strauss. 1986. Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 832–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedkin, N. 1998. A structural theory of social influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodreau, S. 2007. Advances in exponential random graph (p*) models to a large social network. Social Networks 29: 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Granovetter, M. 1982. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Social structure and network analysis, ed. P. Marsden and N. Lin. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Haslam, N. 2004. Four grammars for primate social relations. In Evolutionary social psychology, ed. J. Simpson and D. Kenrick. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Holmes, J. 2000. Social relationships: The nature and function of relational schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology 30: 447–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson, M. 2005. A survey of models of network formation: Stability and efficiency. In Group formation in economics: Networks, clubs and coalitions, ed. G. Demange and M. Wooders. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kumbasar, E., A. Romney, and W. Batchelder. 1994. Systematic biases in social perception. American Journal of Sociology 100: 477–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lomi, A., and P. Pattison. 2006. Manufacturing relations: An empirical study of the organization of production across multiple networks. Organization Science 17: 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyons, A., and Y. Kashima. 2003. How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 989–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Padgett, J., and C. Ansell. 1993. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Padgett, J., and P. McLean. 2006. Organizational invention and elite transformation: The birth of partnership systems in renaissance Florence. American Journal of Sociology 111: 1463–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pattison, P. 1994. Social cognition in context: Some applications of social network analysis. In Advances in social network analysis in the social and behavioral sciences, ed. S. Wasserman and J. Galaskiewicz. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Pattison, P., and G. Robins. 2002. Neighbourhood-based models for social networks. Sociological Methodology 32: 300–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robins, G., and J. Boldero. 2003. Relational discrepancy theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7: 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robins, G., P. Pattison, and P. Elliott. 2001. Network models for social influence processes. Psychometrika 66: 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robins, G., T. Snijders, P. Wang, M. Handcock, and P. Pattison. 2006. Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 29: 192–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Snijders, T. 2001. The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In Sociological methodology 2001, ed. M. Sobel and M. Becker. Boston/London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Snijders, T., C. Steglich, and M. Schweinberger. 2006a. Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences, ed. K. van Montfort, H. Oud, and A. Satorra. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Snijders, T., P. Pattison, G. Robins, and M. Handcock. 2006b. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology 36: 99–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. White, H., S. Boorman, and R. Breiger. 1976. Social structure from multiple networks: I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology 87: 517–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippa Pattison
    • 1
  • Garry Robins
    • 1
  • Yoshi Kashima
    • 1
  1. 1.