The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Competition: Marxian Conceptions

  • Willi Semmler
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_279

Abstract

In the works of the classical economists such as Smith (1776) and Ricardo (1817), competition was identified as a central concept in economic theory. Free competition was regarded as the organizing and equilibrating force in an exchange society, bringing about natural prices as centres of gravity for market prices through capital flows from areas with low rates of returns to areas with high rates. Yet compared with the theory of perfect competition, classical free competition was defined more in terms of economic behaviour than of market structure (Stigler 1957; McNulty 1968; Eatwell 1982). Marx’s concept of competition, rooted in the classical theory of free competition, also refers to the behavioural activities of the capitalist firm. Marx, however, more than the classics, cast serious doubts on the stability properties of the competitive process, and he conceptualized competition as inter-firm dynamics carried out through reorganization of the firm and technical change. In this it somewhat resembles the modern theory of oligopolistic rivalry (Friedman 1982) and Schumpeter’s notion of competition as a process of ‘creative destruction’ (1943).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baran, P., and P. Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  2. Clifton, J.A. 1977. Competition and the evolution of the capitalist mode of production. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1(2): 137–151.Google Scholar
  3. Clifton, J.A. 1983. Administered prices in the context of capitalist development. Contributions to Political Economy 2: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duménil, G., and Lévy, D. 1984. The dynamics of competition: A restoration of the classical analysis. CEPREMAP, No. 8416. Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Eatwell, J. 1982. Competition. In Classical and Marxian political economy: Essays in memory of R. Meek, ed. I. Bradley and M. Howard. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Eichner, A.S. 1976. The Megacorp and oligopoly: Microfoundations of macrodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flaschel, P., and Semmler, W. 1987. Classical and neoclassical competitive adjustment processes. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, J. 1982. Oligopoly theory. In Handbook of mathematical economics, vol. II, ed. K.J. Arrow and M.D. Intriligator. North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Hilferding, R. 1910. Das Finanzkapital. Trans. as Finance Capital. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. Kalecki, M. 1938. Distribution of national income. Reprinted in M. Kalecki, Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  11. Kalecki, M. 1943. Cost and prices. Reprinted in M. Kalecki, Selected essays (1971).Google Scholar
  12. Kuruma, S. 1973. Marx Lexikon zur Politischen Oekonomie, Konkurrenz, vol. 1. Berlin: Oberbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Marx, K. 1847. Lohnarbeit und Kapital. Trans. as Wage labor and capital. New York: International Publishers, 1933.Google Scholar
  14. Marx, K. 1857/8. Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. Trans. as Grundrisse. New York: Random House, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. Marx, K. 1861/3. Theorien über den Mehrwert. Trans. as Theories of surplus value, 3 vols. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1963.Google Scholar
  16. Marx, K. 1867, 1893, 1894. Das Kapital, Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. 3 vols. Trans. as Capital, a critique of political economy. New York: International Publishers, 1967.Google Scholar
  17. McNulty, P.J. 1968. Economic theory and the meaning of competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics 82: 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nikaido, H. 1983. Marx on competition. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 43(4): 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Okishio, N. 1961. Technical changes and the rate of profit. Kobe University Economic Review 7: 85–99.Google Scholar
  20. Ricardo, D. 1817. Principles of political economy and taxation. In Works and correspondence, ed. P. Sraffa, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  21. Roemer, J.E. 1979. Continuing controversy on the falling rate of profit: Fixed capital and other issues. Cambridge Journal of Economics 3(4): 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schumpeter, J. 1943. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  23. Semmler, W. 1984a. Competition, monopoly and differential profit rates. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Semmler, W. 1984b. Marx and Schumpeter on competition, transient surplus profit and technical change. Economie Appliquee 37(3–4): 419–455.Google Scholar
  25. Shaikh, A. 1978. Political economy and capitalism: Notes on Dobb’s theory or crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2(2): 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. E. Cannan. London: Methuen, 1961.Google Scholar
  27. Steedman, I. 1984. Natural prices, differential profit rates, and the classical competitive process. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 52(2): 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stigler, G.J. 1957. Perfect competition, historically contemplated. Journal of Political Economy 65(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sweezy, P.M. 1939. Demand under conditions of oligopoly. Journal of Political Economy 47: 568–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sweezy, P. M. 1942. The theory of capitalist development. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willi Semmler
    • 1
  1. 1.