Abstract
This article deals with the revival of the classical theory of value and distribution, championed by Piero Sraffa. The general rate of profits and relative prices are shown to be determined exclusively in terms of the given system of production and real wages (or the share of wages). Prices generally depend on income distribution. So does the cost-minimizing technique. The ‘quantity of capital’ cannot be ascertained independently of prices and thus the rate of profits. Techniques cannot generally be ordered monotonically with the rate of profits. Marginalist ideas regarding input proportions and input prices therefore cannot generally be sustained.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Bliss, C. 1975. Capital theory and the distribution of income. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Bortkiewicz, L von. 1906/7. Wertrechnung und preisrechnung im marxschen system. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 23(1906):1–50 (essay 1), 25 (1907), 10–51 (essay 2) and 445–88 (essay 3).
Coase, R. 1976. Adam Smith’s view of man. Journal of Law and Economics 19: 529–546.
Garegnani, P. 1970. Heterogeneous capital, the production function and the theory of distribution. Review of Economic Studies 37: 407–436.
Garegnani, P. 1987. Surplus approach to value and distribution. In The new palgrave: A dictionary of economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, vol. 4. London: Macmillan.
Garegnani, P. 2000. Savings, investment and the quantity of capital in general intertemporal equilibrium. In Critical essays on Piero Sraffa’s legacy in economics, ed. H. Kurz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hahn, F. 1982. The neo-ricardians. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 353–374.
Harcourt, G. 1972. Some cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kurz, H., eds. 2000. Critical essays on Piero Sraffa’s legacy in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kurz, H., and N. Salvadori. 1995. Theory of productio: A long-period analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kurz, H., and N. Salvadori. 1998a. Understanding ‘classical’ economics: Studies in long-period theory. London: Routledge.
Kurz, H., and N. Salvadori, eds. 1998b. The elgar companion to classical economics. Vol. 2. Cheltenham/Northhampton: Edward Elgar.
Kurz, H., and N. Salvadori. 1998c. Reverse capital deepening and the numeraire: A note. Review of Political Economy 10: 415–426.
Kurz, H., and N. Salvadori. 1999. Theories of ‘endogenous’ growth in historical perspective. In Contemporary economic issues. Proceedings of the eleventh World congress of the international economic association, volume 4: Economic behaviour and design, ed. M. Sertel. London: Macmillan.
Kurz, H., and N. Salvadori. 2005. Representing the production and circulation of commodities in material terms: On Sraffa’s objectivism. Review of Political Economy 17: 414–441.
Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of economics. 8th ed. London: Macmillan.
Marx, K. 1867. Capital. Vol. 1, 1954. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Marx, K. 1894. Capital. Vol. 3, 1959. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Mas-Colell, A. 1989. Capital theory paradoxes: Anything goes. In Joan Robinson and modern economic theory, ed. R. Feiwel. London: Macmillan.
Mill, J. 1826. Elements of political economy, 3rd edn, reprinted 1844. London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy.
Nelson, R. 2005. Technology, institutions, and economic growth. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Petty, W. 1986. The economic writings of Sir William Petty. New York: Kelley.
Quesnay, F. 1759. In Quesnay’s tableau economique, ed. M. Kuczynski and R. Meek, 1972. London: Macmillan.
Pasinetti, L. 1966. Changes in the rate of profit and switches of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 503–517.
Ricardo, D. 1951/73. The works and correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 vols, ed. P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (In the text referred to as Works, volume number.)
Robinson, J. 1953. The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economic Studies 21: 81–106.
Romer, P. 1994. The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1): 3–22.
Rowthorn, R. 1974. Neo-classicism, neo-Ricardianism and Marxism. New Left Review 86: 63–87.
Schefold, B. 2000. Paradoxes of capital and counter-intuitive changes of distribution in an intertemporal equilibrium model. In Critical essays on Piero Sraffa’s legacy in economics, ed. H. Kurz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, 1976. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities: Prelude to a critique of economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kurz, H.D., Salvadori, N. (2018). Neo-ricardian Economics. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2787
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2787
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences