Skip to main content

Educational Finance

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 43 Accesses

Abstract

The American system of government-financed education is decentralized among 50 states and more than 15,000 local school districts. Local funds are derived from local property taxes, and this system tends to make local spending unequal. State- government efforts to equalize education spending involve manipulating the local ‘tax price’ with matching grants. School districts with low tax prices are not, however, necessarily populated by rich people, so the distribution of state funds may penalize many low-income districts with large amounts of non-residential property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Benabou, R. 1996. Heterogeneity, stratification, and growth: Macroeconomic implications of community structure and school finance. American Economic Review 86: 584–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T.C., and R.P. Goodman. 1973. Private demand for public goods. American Economic Review 63: 280–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T.C., D.L. Rubinfeld, and P. Shapiro. 1982. Micro-based estimates of demand functions for local school expenditures. Econometrica 50: 1183–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, K.L., K.E. Case, and C. Mayer. 2001. Property tax limits, local fiscal behavior, and property values: Evidence from Massachusetts under proposition 2 1/2. Journal of Public Economics 80: 287–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, E.J., and J. Sonstelie. 2006. California’s school finance reform: An experiment in fiscal federalism. In The Tiebout model at fifty, ed. W.A. Fischel. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, W.A. 2006a. Will I see you in September? An economic explanation for the standard school calendar. Journal of Urban Economics 59: 236–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, W.A. 2006b. Why voters veto vouchers: Public schools and community- specific social capital. Economics of Governance 7: 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C.M. 1999. The productivity of schools and other local public goods producers. Journal of Public Economics 74: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C.M. 2000. Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review 90: 1209–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W.E. 1969. The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy 77: 957–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C.M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Fischel, W.A. (2018). Educational Finance. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2684

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics