The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Taking (Eminent Domain)

  • Perry Shapiro
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2680

Abstract

Compensation for a public taking of private property (typically land) can affect both government’s and landowners’ decisions, and compensation rules affect both real and perceived fairness. Arguably, no compensation is efficient; landowners will account for probable loss when making their investment decisions, since such decisions are determined by events outside the discretion of either the landowners or the government (though if the taking decision is made to benefit government or landowners, zero compensation may be inefficient). But zero compensation is unconstitutional (in the United States and Australia) and inequitable. A trade-off between efficiency and equity is therefore normally unavoidable.

Keywords

Compensation calculus Efficiency–equity trade-off Epstein, R Fairness Just compensation Land use Public property Rent seeking Taking Fifth Amendment (US Constitution) 

JEL Classification

H0 K0 K19 H41 D63 D72 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Blume, L., D. Rubinfeld, and P. Shapiro. 1984. The taking of land: When should compensation be paid? Quarterly Journal of Economics 99: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Epstein, R. 1985. Taking: Private property and the power of eminent domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fischel, W. 1995. Regulatory takings, law economics and the power of eminent domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fischel, W., and P. Shapiro. 1988. Taking, insurance and Michelman: Comments on economic interpretation of just compensation law. Journal of Legal Studies 17: 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischel, W., and P. Shapiro. 1989. A constitutional choice model of compensation for takings. International Journal of Law and Economics 9: 115–128.Google Scholar
  6. Michelman, F. 1967. Property, utility and fairness: Comments on the ethical foundations of just compensation law. Harvard Law Review 80: 1165–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Perry Shapiro
    • 1
  1. 1.