Skip to main content

United States, Economics in (1885–1945)

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

The history of American economics following the founding of the American Economic Association in 1885 is not a simple linear narrative of the triumph of neoclassical economics over historical economics. On the contrary, American economics remained a highly plural enterprise until the 1930s. Although there was strife in the 1880s over the proper method of doing economic research, this strife quickly gave way to a long period of détente. Only following the secularization of economics in the 1920s and the advent of the synthesis of neoclassical and Keynesian economics in the 1940s did this pluralism end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Backhouse, R.E. 1998. The transformation of US economics 1920–1960: Viewed through a survey of journal articles. History of Political Economy 30(Suppl.): 85–107. In Interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism, ed. M.S. Morgan, and M. Rutherford. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, W.J. 1985. From new era to new deal: Herbert Hoover, the economists, and American economic policy, 1921–1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, W.J. 1988. Breaking the academic mould: Economists and American higher learning in the nineteenth century. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, W.J. 1996. Designs within disorder: Franklin D. Roosevelt, the economists, and the shaping of American economic policy, 1933–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, W.J. 2003. American economics to 1900. In A companion to the history of economic thought, ed. W.J. Samuels, J.E. Biddle, and J.B. Davis. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, B.W. 1998. Clearing the ground: The demise of the social gospel movement and the rise of neoclassicism in American economics. History of Political Economy 30(Suppl.): 29–52. In Interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism, ed. M.S. Morgan, and M. Rutherford. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, B.W. 2001. Make a righteous number: Social surveys, the men and religion forward movement, and quantification in American economics. History of Political Economy 33(Suppl.): 57–85. In The age of economic measurement, ed. J.L. Klein, and M.S. Morgan. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, B.W. 2004. Why institutional economics matters as a category of historical analysis. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 22A: 219–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, B.W. 2005. Bringing in the state?: The life and times of laissez-faire in the 19th century United States. History of Political Economy 37(Suppl.). In The role of government in the history of political economy, ed. Steven Medema and Peter Boettke. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, B.W., and E. Kapstein. 1999. Retrospectives: Between god and the market: The religious roots of the American economic association. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13(4): 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M. 2001. A perilous progress: Economists and public purpose in twentieth century America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, J. 1998. Institutional economics: A case of reproductive failure? History of Political Economy 30(Suppl.): 108–133. In Interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism, ed. M.S. Morgan, and M. Rutherford. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. 1953. Graduate education in economics. American Economic Review 43: 1–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, E.S. 1933. The theory of monopolistic competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, A.W. 1988. The educational revolution and the professionalization of American economics. In Breaking the academic mould: Economists and American higher learning in the nineteenth century, ed. William J. Barber. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, A.W. 1992a. British and American economic essays, On the history of economic thought. Vol. 1. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, A.W. 1992b. British and American economic essays, The sociology and professionalization of economics. Vol. 2. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. 2002. The reconstruction of American liberalism, 1865–1914. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, D., R. Holt, and J.B. Rosser, ed. 2004. The changing face of economics: Conversations with cutting edge economists. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danbom, D. 1987. The world of hope: Progressives and the struggle for an ethical public life. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, J. 1949. The economic mind in American civilization. Vol. 3, 1865–1918. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, P.H. 1927. The modern technique of mass production and its relation to wages. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science 12: 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. 1911. The purchasing power of money. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. 1923. The business cycle largely ‘a dance of the dollar’. Journal of the American Statistical Association 18: 1024–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. 1925. Our unstable dollar and the so-called business cycle. Journal of the American Statistical Association 20: 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W.T., and W. Catchings. 1923. Money. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W.T., and W. Catchings. 1925. Profits. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W.T., and W. Catchings. 1928. The road to plenty. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furner, M.O. 1975. Advocacy and objectivity: A crisis in the professionalization of American social sciences, 1865–1905. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, A. 1885. Railroad transportation. New York/London: G.P. Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, J. 1965. The German historical school in American scholarship: A study in the transfer of scholarship. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. 2004. The evolution of institutional economics: Agency, structure and darwinism in American institutionalism. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, D.W. 1999. Fabricating the Keynesian revolution: Studies of the inter-war literature on money, the cycle, and unemployment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, J.L. 1885. The history of bimetallism in the United States. 4th ed, 1898. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, M. 1986. Protestantism in the United States: Righteous empire. New York: Scribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrling, P. 1997. The money interest and the public interest: American monetary thought, 1920–1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.S. 1990. A history of econometric analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.S., and M. Rutherford. 1998. Interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. 1991. The origins of American social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. 1999. Institutionalism as ‘scientific’ economics. In From classical economics to the theory of the firm: Essays in honour of D.P. O’Brien, ed. R.E. Backhouse and J. Creedy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. 2000. Understanding institutional economics: 1918–1929. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22: 277–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M., and C.T. DesRoches. 2008. The institutionalist reaction to Keynesian economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. 1924. New measures in the equation of exchange. American Economic Review 14: 699–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taussig, F. 1888. Tariff history of the United States. New York/London: G.P. Putnam & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonay, Y. 1998. The struggle for the soul of economics: Institutionalist and neoclassical economists in America between the wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bateman, B.W. (2018). United States, Economics in (1885–1945). In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2676

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics