Skip to main content

Asymmetric Information

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 257 Accesses

Abstract

The Arrow-Debreu model is the basic model in which the two classical welfare theorems of economics are expressed. Under quite general assumptions, it can be shown that, first, a competitive equilibrium allocation, or Walrasian allocation, is Pareto efficient (Pareto optimal); second, under somewhat different assumptions, any Pareto efficient allocation will be a competitive equilibrium allocation after some suitable redistribution of initial endowments. Implicitly or explicitly, the statement of the first welfare theorem assumes that all economic agents have the same information about all economic variables. This is not to say that uncertainty is ruled out; there may be uncertainty as long as all agents are identically uncertain. If this assumption of symmetric information is violated, the competitive outcome will no longer be guaranteed to be Pareto efficient. The introduction of asymmetric information into various economic problems has given us new insight into how market failures might arise and whether there may be governmental, or other non-market, corrections which can improve welfare. Several examples illustrating this are given below.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akerlof, G. 1970. The market for lemons. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A., and J. Stiglitz. 1980. Lectures on public economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C., and B. Nalebuff. 1984. Dragon-slaying and ballroom dancing: The private supply of a public good. Journal of Public Economics 25: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., and R. Myerson. 1983. Efficient and durable decision rules with incomplete information. Econometrica 51: 1799–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., P. Milgrom, J. Roberts, and R. Wilson. 1982. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory 27: 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1982a. Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory 27: 280–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1982b. Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: An equilibrium analysis. Econometrica 50: 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. 1979. Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47: 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. 1985. Implicit contracts: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 23: 1144–1175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Postlewaite, A. (2018). Asymmetric Information. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_265

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics