The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Hazardous Waste, Economics of

  • Hilary Sigman
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2649

Abstract

Public policies for hazardous waste address both current waste management and the clean-up of a legacy of contamination. Policies for current waste management should provide incentives for waste generators that are sensitive to the varying hazards posed by waste. Although conventional regulations have difficulty accomplishing this variation, alternative incentive-based policies show promise empirically. Policies for clean-up of contamination often fail to strike an appropriate balance between hazards posed by the contamination and costs of clean-up. In addition, relying on legal liability to fund these clean-ups has consequences for the costs of clean-up and possibly for the redevelopment of contaminated land.

Keywords

Brownfield sites Compensation Environmental economics Environmental equity Environmental externalities Environmental liability Environmental Liability Directive (EU) Hazardous waste management Hazardous waste regulation Hazardous waste, economics of Hedonic property values Legal liability Strict liability Superfund (USA) Waste-end taxes 

JEL Classifications

Q5 Q53 K32 H23 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Alberini, A., and D. Austin. 2002. Accidents waiting to happen: Liability policy and toxic pollution releases. Review of Economics and Statistics 84: 729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd, J., W. Harrington, and M. Macauley. 1996. The effects of environmental liability on industrial real estate development. Journal of Real Estate Economics and Finance 12: 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, H., and H. Sigman. 2000. Incentives to settle under joint and several liability: An empirical analysis of Superfund litigation. Journal of Legal Studies 29: 205–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, H., and H. Sigman. 2005. The effect of joint and several liability under Superfund on brownfields. Working Paper No. 11667. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  5. Dixon, L. 1995. The transactions costs generated by Superfund’s liability approach. In Analyzing superfund: Economics, science and law, ed. R. Revesz and R. Steward. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. 2000. Study on investment and employment related to EU policy on air, water and waste. EC 4739/M/11452–0. Online. Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/industry_employment/investment_and_employment.htm. Accessed 14 Apr 2006.
  7. Fullerton, D., and T. Kinnaman. 1995. Garbage, recycling, and illicit burning or dumping. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenstone, M., and J. Gallagher. 2005. Does hazardous waste matter? Evidence from the housing market and the Superfund program. Working Paper No. 11790. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton, J. 2005. Environmental equity and the siting of hazardous waste facilities in OECD countries: Evidence and policies. In International yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2005/2006, ed. H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton, J., and W. Viscusi. 1999. Calculating risks? The spatial and political dimensions of hazardous waste policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kornhauser, L., and R. Revesz. 1994. Multidefendant settlements: The impact of joint and several liability. Journal of Legal Studies 23: 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levinson, A. 1999. State taxes and interstate hazardous waste shipments. American Economic Review 89: 666–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levinson, A. 2003. Environmental regulatory competition: A status report and some new evidence. National Tax Journal 56: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McGrath, D. 2002. Urban industrial land redevelopment and contamination risk. Journal of Urban Economics 47: 414–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Minehart, D., and Z. Neeman. 2002. Effective siting of waste treatment facilities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43: 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)/EEA (European Environment Agency). 2006. Database on economic instruments and voluntary approaches used in environmental policy and natural resources management. Online. Available at http://www2.oecd.org/ecoinst/queries/index.htm. Accessed 12 Apr 2006.
  17. Segerson, K. 1993. Liability transfers: An economic assessment of buyer and lender liability. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25: S64–S65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sigman, H. 1996. The effects of hazardous waste taxes on waste generation and disposal. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sigman, H. 1998a. Midnight dumping: Public policies and illegal disposal of used oil. RAND Journal of Economics 29: 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sigman, H. 1998b. Liability funding and Superfund clean-up remedies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 35: 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sigman, H. 2000. Hazardous waste and toxic substance policies. In Public policies for environmental protection, 2nd ed., ed. P. Portney and R. Stavins. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  22. Sigman, H. 2001. The pace of progress at superfund sites: Policy goals and interest group influence. Journal of Law and Economics 44: 315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sigman, H. 2006. Environmental liability and the reuse of old industrial land. Working paper. Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  24. Stafford, S. 2003. Assessing the effectiveness of state regulation and enforcement of hazardous waste. Journal of Regulatory Economics 23: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tietenberg, T. 1989. Indivisible toxic torts: The economics and joint and several liability. Land Economics 65: 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1990. Environmental investments: The cost of a clean environment. Washington, DC: EPA.Google Scholar
  27. U.S. EPA. 2005. Superfund Benefits Analysis (Draft). Online. Available at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/news/benefits.htm. Accessed 12 Apr 2006.

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hilary Sigman
    • 1
  1. 1.