Skip to main content

Stratified and Cluster Sampling

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

The random sampling paradigm, typically introduced in basic statistics courses, ensures that a sample of data is, loosely speaking, ‘representative’ of the underlying population. When the population parameters are identified, many common estimation techniques, including least squares, maximum likelihood, and instrumental variables, have desirable statistical properties under random sampling. Unfortunately, while random sampling is convenient, it can be, and often intentionally is, violated when cross-sectional data and panel data are collected. Two important deviations from random sampling are stratified sampling and cluster sampling, or perhaps a combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Cosslett, S.R. 1993. Estimation from endogenously stratified samples. In Handbook of statistics, ed. G.S. Maddala, C.R. Rao, and H.D. Vinod, Vol. 11. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G.W., and T. Lancaster. 1996. Efficient estimation and stratified sampling. Journal of Econometrics 74: 289–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, N.P. 1985. Least squares regression with data arising from stratified samples of the dependent variable. Biometrika 72: 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C.F., and S. Lerman. 1977. The estimation of choice probabilities from choice-based samples. Econometrica 45: 1977–1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A.J., and D. Holt. 1982. The effect of two-state sampling on ordinary least squares methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77: 848–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. 1982. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 1999. Asymptotic properties of weighted M-estimators for variable probability samples. Econometrica 67: 1385–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 2001. Asymptotic properties of weighted M-estimators for standard stratified samples. Econometric Theory 17: 451–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 2003. Cluster sample methods in applied econometrics. American Economic Review 93: 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wooldridge, J.M. (2018). Stratified and Cluster Sampling. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2639

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics