Skip to main content

Recursive Contracts

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

A number of dynamic models in economics are formulated with forward-looking elements in the constraints – for example, models of risk-sharing with participation constraints and models of optimal policy. Here, standard dynamic programming does not apply. Recent contributions show how to reformulate these models by either rewriting the forward-looking constraints (promised utility approach) or by using a Lagrangean formulation (recursive Lagrangean). Both make it possible to obtain a recursive formulation that allows for easier computation and analytical results. A number of applications can be found to optimal fiscal or monetary policy, risk sharing or investment with various financial constraints, and employment decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abraham, A., and E. Carceles-Poveda. 2006. Endogenous incomplete markets, enforcement constraints, and intermediation. Theoretical Economics 1: 439–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, A., and N. Pavoni. 2005. The efficient allocation of consumption under moral hazard and hidden access to the credit market. Journal of the European Economic Association 3: 370–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abreu, D., D. Pierce, and E. Stachetti. 1990. Towards a theory of discounted repeated games with imperfect monitoring. Econometrica 58: 1041–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiyagari, R., A. Marcet, T.J. Sargent, and J. Seppälä. 2002. Optimal Taxation without state-contingent debt. Journal of Political Economy 110: 1220–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, F., and U.J. Jermann. 2000. Efficiency, equilibrium, and asset pricing with risk of default. Econometrica 68: 775–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, O., and J.V. Ríos-Rull. 2000. Consumption smoothing in island economies: Can public insurance reduce welfare? European Economic Review 44: 1225–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, R. 1998. Credible monetary policy with long-lived agents: Recursive approaches. Journal of Economic Theory 81: 431–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, T.F., R. Marimon, and V. Quadrini. 2004. Aggregate consequences of limited contract enforceability. Journal of Political Economy 112: 817–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, G., and A. Marcet. 2004. Limited commitment and temporary exclusion. Mimeo, Institut d’Analisi Economica, CSIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golosov, M., N.R. Kocherlakota, and A. Tsyvinski. 2003. Optimal indirect and capital taxation. Review of Economic Studies 70: 569–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopenhayn, H.A., and J.P. Nicolini. 1997. Optimal unemployment insurance. Journal of Political Economy 105: 412–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, K.L., S. Yeltekin, and J. Conklin. 2003. Computing supergame equilibria. Econometrica 71: 1239–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, P.J., and F. Perri. 2002. International business cycles with endogenous incomplete markets. Econometrica 70: 907–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R.G., A. Kahn, and A.L. Wolman. 2003. Optimal monetary policy. Review of Economic Studies 70: 825–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocherlakota, N.R. 1996. Implications of efficient risk sharing without commitment. Review of Economic Studies 63: 595–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F.E., and E.C. Prescott. 1977. Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy 85: 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcet, A., and R. Marimon. 1992. Communication, commitment and growth. Journal of Economic Theory 58: 219–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcet, A., and R. Marimon. 1998. Recursive contracts. Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, C., and E. Stacchetti. 2001. Sequential equilibria in a Ramsey tax model. Econometrica 69: 1491–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, C., and R.M. Townsend. 1991. Computing multi-period, information-constrained optima. Review of Economic Studies 58: 853–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, A. 2004. Do endogenous incomplete markets explain cross-country consumption correlations and the dynamics of the terms of trade? Berlin: Mimeo, Humboldt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. 2007. Optimal taxation and OECD labor taxes. Journal of Monetary Economics 54: 925–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Marcet, A. (2018). Recursive Contracts. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2597

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics