The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Climate Change, Economics of

  • Lawrence H. Goulder
  • William A. Pizer
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2595

Abstract

Climate-change economics attends to the various threats posed by global climate change by offering theoretical and empirical insights relevant to the design of policies to reduce, avoid, or adapt to such change. This economic analysis has yielded new estimates of mitigation benefits, improved assessments of policy costs in the presence of various market distortions or imperfections, better tools for making policy choices under uncertainty, and alternative mechanisms for allowing flexibility in policy responses. These contributions have influenced the formulation and implementation of a range of climate-change policies at domestic and international levels.

Keywords

Carbon emissions tax Climate change, economics of Computable general equilibrium (CGE) models Contingent valuation Discount rate Global warming Hedonic approach Integrated assessment models Intergenerational equity Learning-by-doing Monte Carlo methods Price-based vs. quantity-based policies Production function approach Technology policy Time preference Tradable emission permits Uncertainty 

JEL Classification

Q54 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge very helpful comments on earlier drafts by Kenneth Arrow, Steven Durlauf, Raymond Kopp, Richard Morgenstern, Robert Stavins and Roberton Williams III.

Bibliography

  1. Aldy, J., S. Barrett, and R. Stavins. 2003. Thirteen plus one: A comparison of alternative climate policy architectures. Climate Policy 3: 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow, K., W. Cline, K.-G. Maler, M. Munasinghe, R. Squitieri, and J. Stiglitz. 1996. Intertemporal equity, discounting and economic efficiency. In Climate change 1995 – Economic and social dimensions of climate change, ed. J. Bruce, H. Lee, and E. Haites. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, S. 2003. Environment and statecraft. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barretto, L., and S. Kypreos. 2004. Emissions trading and technology deployment in an energy-system ‘bottom-up’ model with technological learning. European Journal of Operations Research 158: 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bovenberg, A., and L. Goulder. 2001. Neutralizing the adverse industry impacts of CO2 abatement policies: What does it cost? In Behavioral and distributional effects of environmental policies, ed. C. Carraro and G. Metcalf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buonanno, P., C. Carraro, and E. Galeotti. 2003. Endogenous induced technical change and the costs of Kyoto. Resource and Energy Economics 25: 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carraro, C. (ed.). 2003. The endogenous formation of economic coalitions. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Conrad, K. 2002. Computable general equilibrium models in environmental and resource economics. In The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2002–2003, ed. T. Tietenberg and H. Folmer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, C. 2004a. Emission pricing, spillovers, and public investment in environmentally friendly technologies. Discussion Paper 04–02. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, C. 2004b. Project-based mechanisms for emissions reductions: balancing trade-offs with baselines. Energy Policy 33:1807–1823.Google Scholar
  11. Fischer, C., and R. Newell. 2005. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Working Paper. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  12. Goulder, L., and S. Schneider. 1999. Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 emissions abatement policies. Resource and Energy Economics 21: 211–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goulder, L., I. Parry, R. Williams III, and D. Burtraw. 1999. The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. Journal of Public Economics 72: 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoel, M., and K. Schneider. 1997. Incentives to participate in an international environmental agreement. Environment and Resource Economics 9: 153–170.Google Scholar
  15. Jacoby, H., and A. Ellerman. 2004. The safety valve and climate policy. Energy Policy 32: 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jorgenson, D., and P. Wilcoxen. 1996. Reducing U.S. Carbon emissions: An econometric general equilibrium assessment. In Reducing global carbon dioxide emissions: Costs and policy options, ed. D. Gaskins and J. Weyant. Stanford: Energy Modeling Forum/Stanford University.Google Scholar
  17. Kling, C., and J. Rubin. 1997. Bankable permits for the control of environmental pollution. Journal of Public Economics 64: 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolstad, C. 1996. Learning and stock effects in environmental regulation: The case of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manne, A., and R. Richels. 2004. The impacts of learning-by-doing on the timing and costs of CO2 abatement. Energy Economics 26: 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mansur, E., R. Mendelsohn, and W. Morrison. 2005. A discrete-continuous choice model of climate change impacts on energy. New Haven: Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
  21. McFarland, J., J. Reilly, and H. Herzog. 2004. Representing energy technologies in top-down economic models using bottom-up information. Energy Economics 26: 685–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mendelsohn, R. 2003. Assessing the market damages from climate change. In Global climate change: The science, economics, and politics, ed. J. Griffin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. Mendelsohn, R., W. Nordhaus, and D. Shaw. 1994. The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis. American Economic Review 84: 753–771.Google Scholar
  24. Newell, R., and W. Pizer. 2003a. Discounting the distant future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46: 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newell, R., and W. Pizer. 2003b. Regulating stock externalities under uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newell, R., and S. Anderson. 2004. Prospects for carbon capture and storage technology. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29: 109–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nordhaus, W. 1982. How fast should we graze the global commons? American Economic Review 72: 242–246.Google Scholar
  28. Nordhaus, W. 1994. Managing the global commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nordhaus, W. 2002. Modeling induced innovation in climate-change policy. In Technological change and the environment, ed. A. Grübler, N. Nakicenovic, and W.D. Nordhaus. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  30. Parry, I., and W. Oates. 2000. Policy analysis in the presence of distorting taxes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19: 603–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parry, I., R. Williams III, and L. Goulder. 1999. When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37: 52–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pindyck, R. 2000. Irreversiblities and the timing of environmental policy. Resource and Energy Economics 22: 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pizer, W. 1999. Optimal choice of policy instrument and stringency under uncertainty: The case of climate change. Resource and Energy Economics 21: 255–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pizer, W. 2002. Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change. Journal of Public Economics 85: 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Popp, D. 2004. ENTICE: Endogenous technological change in the DICE model of global warming. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48: 742–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reilly, J., M. Babiker, and M. Mayer. 2001. Comparing greenhouse gases. Cambridge, MA: MIT Joint Center for the Science and Policy of Global Change.Google Scholar
  37. Richards, K., and R. Stavins. 2005. The cost of U.S. Forest-based carbon sequestration. Arlington: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
  38. Roughgarden, T., and S. Schneider. 1999. Climate change policy: Quantifying uncertainties for damage and optimal carbon taxes. Energy Policy 27: 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schlenker, W., A. Fisher, and M. Hanemann. 2005. Will U.S. agriculture really benefit from global warming? Accounting for irrigation in the hedonic approach. American Economic Review 95: 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmalensee, R. 1993. Comparing greenhouse gases for policy purposes. Energy Journal 14: 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schneider, S., and L. Goulder. 1997. Achieving low-cost emissions targets. Nature 389: 13–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sedjo, R. 1995. The economics of managing carbon via forestry: An assessment of existing studies. Environment and Resource Economics 6(2): 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, V. 2004. Fifty years of contingent valuation. In The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2004–2005, ed. T. Tietenberg and H. Folmer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, J., and D. Tirpak. 1989. The potential effects of global climate change on the United States: Report to congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  45. Tol, R. 2005. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: An assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 33: 2064–2074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tulkens, H. 1998. Cooperation versus free riding in international environmental affairs: Two approaches. In Game theory and the environment, ed. N. Hanley and H. Folmer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  47. Weitzman, M. 1974. Prices vs. quantities. Review of Economic Studies 41: 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weitzman, M. 1998. Why the far-distant future should be discounted at the lowest possible rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weyant, J., and J. Hill. 1999. The costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A multi-model evaluation, introduction and overview. Energy Journal, Special Issue.Google Scholar
  50. Wigley, T., R. Richels, and J. Edmonds. 1996. Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 379: 240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, R. 2002. Prices vs. quantities vs. tradable quantities. Working Paper No. 9283. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  52. Yohe, G., H. Ameden, P. Marshall, and J. Neumann. 1996. The economic cost of greenhouse-induced sea-level rise for developed property in the United States. Climatic Change 32: 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence H. Goulder
    • 1
  • William A. Pizer
    • 1
  1. 1.