Skip to main content

Difference-in-Difference Estimators

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

This article discusses difference-in-differences (DID) estimators, which are commonly applied in evaluation research. In particular, the discussion focuses on (a) motivation, definition and interpretation of DID estimators, (b) conditions under which DID estimators are valid, (c) data requirements to compute DID estimators, (d) representative applications of DID estimators in the empirical economics literature, (e) extensions of DID estimators, and (f) a simple indirect test to assess the validity of these estimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abadie, A. 2005. Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Review of Economic Studies 72: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J.D., and A.B.. Krueger. 1999. Empirical strategies in labor economics. In Handbook of labor economics, ed. O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, Vol. 3A. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O., and D. Card. 1985. Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effects of training programs. Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 648–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athey, S.C., and G.W. Imbens. 2006. Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-difference models. Econometrica 74: 431–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., and T. MaCurdy. 1999. Labor supply: A review of alternative approaches. In Handbook of labor economics, ed. O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, Vol. 3A. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. 1990. The impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 44: 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., and A.B.. Krueger. 1994. Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. American Economic Review 84: 772–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, G.T., and G. Hanka. 1999. Capital structure and corporate control: The effect of antitakeover statutes on firm leverage. Journal of Finance 54: 519–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., and J. Poterba. 1994. Tax incentives and the decision to purchase health insurance: Evidence from the self-employed. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 701–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J., H. Ichimura, and P.E. Todd. 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies 64: 605–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.D. 1995. Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13: 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.D., W.K. Viscusi, and D.L. Durbin. 1995. Workers’ compensation and injury duration: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Economic Review 85: 322–340.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Abadie, A. (2018). Difference-in-Difference Estimators. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2593

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics