The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Falsificationism

  • Daniel M. Hausman
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2584

Abstract

Many economists would emphasize that scientific claims must be capable of falsification. According to Milton Friedman, an hypothesis ‘is rejected if its predictions are contradicted.… Factual evidence can never “prove” a hypothesis; it can only fail to disprove it…’ (1953, p. 9). These claims echo Karl Popper’s philosophy of science, which, on one interpretation, maintains that what distinguishes scientific theories from theories that are not scientific is that scientific theories are falsifiable. A theory is falsifiable if it is logically inconsistent with some finite set of ‘basic statements’ – that is, true or false reports of observation. A true theory will not be inconsistent with any set of true basic statements, but it will still be falsifiable because it is inconsistent with (or ‘forbids’) some observation reports. In other words, logic and observation can force one to give up falsifiable theories. Popper notes that there is an asymmetry between falsification and verification: basic statements can be logically inconsistent with universal generalizations and can thereby disprove them, but they do not imply that any universal generalizations are true. In his view scientific knowledge grows exclusively from falsification. Verification and even confirmation are impossible.

Keywords

Blaug, M Falsificationism Friedman, M Popper, K Scientific method Theory appraisal Verification 

JEL Classification

D6 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Blaug, M. 1976. Kuhn versus Lakatos or Paradigms versus research programmes in the history of economics. In Method and appraisal in economics, ed. S. Latsis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Caldwell, B. 1991. Clarifying popper. Journal of Economic Literature 29: 1–33.Google Scholar
  3. Friedman, M. 1953. The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Popper, K. 1957. The poverty of historicism. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  5. Popper, K. 1966. The open society and its enemies, vol. 2, 5th ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Popper, K. 1968. The logic of scientific discovery, Revised edn. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
  7. Popper, K. 1969. Conjectures and refutations; The growth of scientific knowledge, 3rd ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Popper, K. 1972. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  9. Popper, K. 1976. The unended quest. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel M. Hausman
    • 1
  1. 1.