The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Real Bills Doctrine Versus the Quantity Theory

  • Timothy S. Fuerst
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2579

Abstract

The real bills doctrine and the quantity theory of money represent distinct theoretical models of price-level determination and consequently imply different prescriptions for the conduct of monetary policy. The real bills doctrine takes the price level as exogenous and recommends money supply movements that passively respond to the economy. In sharp contrast, the quantity theory insists that the only way to ensure price level stability is by constraining the money supply and not allowing the money supply to move passively in response to economic conditions.

Keywords

Central banks Credit Equation of exchange Federal Reserve System Fiat money Fisher, I. Gold standard Great Depression Hume, D. Inflation Interest rate policy Law, J. Monetary policy Money supply Neutrality of money Nominal interest rates Quantity theory of money Real bills doctrine Real bills doctrine versus the quantity theory Ricardo, D. Smith, A. Thornton, H. Velocity of circulation 

JEL Classifications

E31 E52 E6 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 1924. Tenth annual report of the federal reserve board: Covering operations for the year 1923. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  2. Fisher, I. 1922. The purchasing power of money, reprinted. 2 ed, 1963. New York: August M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  3. Friedman, M. 1956. The quantity theory of money: A restatement. In Studies in the quantity theory of money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hume, D. 1752. Of interest; of money. In Writings on economics, ed. E. Rotwein, 1970. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  5. Humphrey, T.M. 1974. The quantity theory of money: Its historical evolution and role in policy debates. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Review 1974(May/June): 2–19.Google Scholar
  6. Humphrey, T.M. 1982. The real bills doctrine. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Review 1982(September/October): 3–13.Google Scholar
  7. Humphrey, T.M. 2001. Monetary policy frameworks and indicators for the federal reserve in the 1920s. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 87(1): 65–92.Google Scholar
  8. Laidler, D. 1981. Adam Smith as a monetary economist. Canadian Journal of Economics 14: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laidler, D. 1984. Misconceptions about the real bills doctrine: A comment on Sargent and Wallace. Journal of Political Economy 92: 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Law, J. 1705. Money and trade considered. Edinburgh: Anderson.Google Scholar
  11. Meltzer, A.H. 2003. A history of the federal reserve, Volume I: 1913–1951. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pigou, A.C. 1917. The value of money. Quarterly Journal of Economics 32(November): 38–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pigou, A.C. 1927. Industrial fluctuations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Sargent, T.J. 1987. Macroeconomic theory. 2 ed. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sargent, T.J., and N. Wallace. 1982. The real-bills doctrine vs. the quantity theory: A reconsideration. Journal of Political Economy 90: 1212–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, 1976. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  17. Thornton, H. 1802. An enquiry into the nature and effects of the paper credit of Great Britain, 1939. London: LSE Reprint Series.Google Scholar
  18. Woodford, M. 2003. Interest and prices. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy S. Fuerst
    • 1
  1. 1.