Skip to main content

Globalization and Labour

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

The entry of China, India, and the ex-Soviet countries into the world trading system in the 1990s has made globalization an increasingly important driver of labour outcomes across the world. Through trade, capital flows, the spread of technology and education, the world has begun to move towards a truly global labour market. Still, the dispersion of wages for similar work across countries remains high and immigration is the least developed part of globalization, leaving considerable scope for national labour markets, policies, and institutions to affect wages and worker well-being into the foreseeable future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bhagwati, J. 2000. Why Nike is on the right track. Financial Times, 1 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debaere, P. 2003. Relative factor abundance and trade. Journal of Political Economy 111: 589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, K., and R. Freeman. 2003. Can labor standards improve under globalization? Washingon, DC: Institute for international economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B. 1995. Are your wages set in Beijing? Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(3): 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. 2005a. The great doubling: America in the new global economy. Usery Lecture, Georgia State University, 8 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. 2005b. What really ails Europe (and America): The doubling of the global workforce. The Globalist, 3 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. 2006. People flows. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2): 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B., and R.H. Oostendorp. 2001. The occupational wages around the world data file. International Labour Review 140: 379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P.K., and N. Pavcnik. 2007. Distributional effects of globalization in developing countries. Journal of Economic Literature 45: 39–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomory, R., and W. Baumol. 2000. Global trade and conflicting national interests. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hail, L., and C. Leuz. 2004. International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter? Working Paper 04–06, Wharton Financial Institutions Center, University of Pennsylvania. Online. Available at http://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/04/0406.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2007.

  • Hiscox, M., and N. Smyth. 2005. Is there consumer demand for improved labor standards? Evidence from field experiments in social labeling. Harvard University. Online. Available at http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu:9095/Bgov3009/Calendar/SocialLabeling_2.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2007.

  • International Monetary Fund. 2007. World Economic Outlook database 2004. Online. Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2004/01/data/index.htm. Accessed 12 June 2007.

  • Krugman, P. 1979. A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy 87: 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. 1957. International trade and factor mobility. American Economic Review 47: 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A.L., J.D. Roessner, N. Newman, X.-Y. Jin, and D. Johnson. 2006. High tech indicators: Technology-based competitiveness of 33 nations: 2005 final report. Atlanta: Technology Policy and Assessment Center, Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffin, R.J. 1999. The nature and significance of intra-industry trade. Economic and Financial Review. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Online. Available at http://www.dallasfed.org/research/efr/1999/efr9904a.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2007.

  • Samuelson, P. 2004. Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and confirm arguments of mainstream economists supporting globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(3): 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T.N. 1994. International labor standards once again! In International Labor Standards and Global Economic Integration: Proceedings of a Symposium, ed. G.K. Schoepfle and K.A. Swinnerton. Washington, DC: Bureau of International Labor Affairs, US Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trefler, D. 1995. The case of the missing trade and other mysteries. American Economic Review 85: 1029–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S.C., and D. Trefler. 2005. Trade and inequality in developing countries: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of International Economics 65: 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Freeman, R.B. (2018). Globalization and Labour. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2573

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics