Skip to main content

Treatment Effect

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

The term ‘treatment effect’ refers to the causal effect of a binary (0–1) variable on an outcome variable of scientific or policy interest. Economics examples include the effects of government programmes and policies, such as those that subsidize training for disadvantaged workers, and the effects of individual choices like college attendance. The principal econometric problem in the estimation of treatment effects is selection bias, which arises from the fact that treated individuals differ from the non-treated for reasons other than treatment status per se. Treatment effects can be estimated using social experiments, regression models, matching estimators, and instrumental variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Angrist, J. 1990. Lifetime earnings and the Vietnam era draft lottery: Evidence from social security administrative records. American Economic Review 80: 313–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. 1991. Grouped-data estimation and testing in simple labor-supply models. Journal of Econometrics 47: 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. 1998. Estimating the labor market impact of voluntary military service using Social Security data on military applicants. Econometrica 66: 249–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J., and G. Imbens. 1995. Two-stage least squares estimates of average causal effects in models with variable treatment intensity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J., G. Imbens, and D. Rubin. 1996. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91: 444–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J., and A. Krueger. 2001. Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4): 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O. 1978. Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings. Review of Economics and Statistics 6: 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O., and D. Card. 1985. Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 648–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia, R., and S. Wahba. 1999. Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94: 1053–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. 1976. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5: 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47: 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James J., and R. Robb. 1985. Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions. In Longitudinal analysis of labor market data, ed. J. Heckman and B. Singer. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. 1986. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 945–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G., and J. Angrist. 1994. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62: 467–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, R. 1958. The estimation of the parameters of a linear regression system obeying two separate regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53: 873–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70: 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. 1974. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. 1977. Assignment to a treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics 2: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, A. 1940. The fitting of straight lines if both variables are subject to error. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11: 284–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Angrist, J.D. (2018). Treatment Effect. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2533

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics