Skip to main content

Heterodox Economics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 109 Accesses

Abstract

Although ‘heterodox economics’ is a widely used term, precisely what it means is debated. I argue that heterodox economics refers to a body of economic theories that holds an alternative position vis-à-vis mainstream economics; to a community of heterodox economists who identify themselves as such and embrace a pluralistic attitude towards heterodox theories without rejecting contestability and incommensurability among heterodox theories; and to the development of a coherent economic theory that draws upon various theoretical contributions by heterodox approaches which stand in contrast to mainstream theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bortis, H. 1997. Institutions, behaviour and economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, S.C. 2000. Prospects for the progress of heterodox economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22: 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruchy, A.G. 1987. The reconstruction of economics: An analysis of the fundamentals of institutional economics. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, S. 2001. Debunking economics: The naked emperor of the social sciences. New York City: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, M. 2006. Do heterodox theories have anything in common? A Post-Keynesian point of view. International Journal of Ecodynamics 3: 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. 1997. Economics and reality. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F.S. 2001. Conference of socialist economists and the emergence of heterodox economics in post-war Britain. Capital & Class 75: 15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F.S. 2002. The association for heterodox economics: Past, present, and future. Journal of Australian Political Economy 50: 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F.S. 2004. To be a heterodox economist: the contested landscape of American economics, 1960s and 1970s. Journal of Economic Issues 38: 747–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F.S., and S. Keen. 2004. The incoherent emperor: A heterodox critique of neoclassical microeconomic theory. Review of Social Economy 62: 169–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F.S., S. Cohen, G. Schneider, and P. Quick. 2005. Informational directory for heterodox economists: Journals, book series, websites, and graduate and undergraduate programs. 2nd ed. Kansas City: Department of Economics, University of Missouri-Kansas City . Online. Available at http://l.web.umkc.edu/leefs/htnf/HeterodoxDirectory.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthaei, J. 1984. Rethinking scarcity: Neoclassicism, neoMalthusianism, and neoMarxism. Review of Radical Political Economics 16: 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, P.A., eds. 1999. Encyclopedia of political economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, P.A. 2000. Marx, Veblen, and contemporary institutional political economy: Principles and unstable dynamics of capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, P.A. 2002. The role of institutions and the current crises of capitalism: A reply to Howard Sherman and John Henry. Review of Social Economy 60: 609–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. 2004. Social provisioning as a starting point for feminist economics. Feminist Economics 10: 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. 2004. Capital, distribution and macroeconomics: ‘Core’ beliefs and theoretical foundations. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28: 527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrenn, M.V. 2004. What is heterodox economics? Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lee, F.S. (2018). Heterodox Economics. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2487

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics