The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Land Markets

  • Klaus W. Deininger
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2473

Abstract

While earlier research highlighted the potential market inefficiencies that can result from the particular characteristics of land, recent empirical evidence suggests that these may be small, not always amenable to policy intervention, and outweighed by the contribution of land markets to broader structural transformations, like population movements out of agriculture. High levels of transaction costs pose, however, still considerable obstacles to land market operation, suggesting that measures to reduce them through greater security and formalization of property rights, a streamlined regulatory framework, and ready availability of information may significantly improve functioning of, and enhance benefits from, land markets.

Keywords

Access to land Agricultural economics Banking crises Fixed-rent contracts Land markets Land reform Land registries Land tax Land use rights Land use regulation Property rights Rent control Repeated games Sharecropping Structural change 

JEL Classifications

Q15 R14 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Andolfatto, D. 2002. A theory of inalienable property rights. Journal of Political Economy 110: 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu, K., and P.M. Emerson. 2000. The economics of tenancy rent control. Economic Journal 110: 939–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird, R.M. 2004. International handbook of land and property taxation. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cain, M. 1981. Risk and insurance: Perspectives on fertility and agrarian change in India and Bangladesh. Population and Development Review 7: 435–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheung, S.N. 1969. Transaction costs, risk aversion, and the choice of contractual arrangements. Journal of Law and Economics 12: 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Soto, H. 2000. The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Deininger, K. 2003. Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. A world bank policy research report. New York/ Oxford: World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Deininger, K., and S. Jin. 2005. The potential of land markets in the process of economic development: Evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics 78: 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deininger, K., and S. Jin. 2006. Productivity and equity effects of rental markets: Evidence from China. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Deininger, K., and S. Jin. 2007. Does greater tenure security allow more efficiency-enhancing land transactions? Evidence from Vietnam. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank.Google Scholar
  11. Deininger, K., S. Jin, and H.K. Nagarajan. 2006. Equity and efficiency impacts of rural land market restrictions: Evidence from India. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Nagarajan, H.K., Deininger, K. and Jin, S. 2007. Market vs. non-market sales transactions in India: Evidence over a 20-year period. Economic and Political Weekly.Google Scholar
  13. Otsuka, K., and Y. Hayami. 1988. Theories of share tenancy: A critical survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 37(1): 31–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pender, J., and M. Fafchamps. 2006. Land lease markets and agricultural efficiency in Ethiopia. Journal of African Economies 15: 251–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ray, T. 2005. Sharecropping, land exploitation and land-improving investments. Japanese Economic Review 56(2): 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shaban, R.A. 1987. Testing between competing models of sharecropping. Journal of Political Economy 95: 893–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shetty, S. 1988. Limited liability, wealth differences and tenancy contracts in agrarian economies. Journal of Development Economics 29: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skoufias, E. 1995. Household resources, transaction costs, and adjustment through land tenancy. Land Economics 71: 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swinnen, J.F.M., and L. Vranken. 2006. Patterns of land market development in transition. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank.Google Scholar
  20. World Bank. 2002. Mexico - land policy A decade after the Ejido reforms. Washington, DC: Rural Development and Natural Resources Sector Unit, World Bank.Google Scholar
  21. Zimmerman, F.J., and M.R. Carter. 1999. A dynamic option value for institutional change: Marketable property rights in the Sahel. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 467–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zimmerman, F.J., and M.R. Carter. 2003. Asset smoothing, consumption smoothing and the reproduction of inequality under risk and subsistence constraints. Journal of Development Economics 71: 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus W. Deininger
    • 1
  1. 1.