Skip to main content

New Institutional Economics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 360 Accesses

Abstract

The new institutional economics (NIE) consists of a set of analytical tools or concepts from a variety of disciplines in the social sciences, business and law. The NIE addresses two overarching issues: what are the determinants of institutions – the formal and informal rules shaping social, economic and political behaviour? And what impact do institutions have on economic performance? It is the impact of institutions via property rights and transaction costs that ultimately affect the ability of individuals and societies (at a macro level) to extract the gains from trade which in turn can lead to enhanced economic well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alchian, A., and H. Demsetz. 1972. Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review 62: 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J. 1996. Empirical work in institutional economics. In Empirical studies in institutional change, ed. L.J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. North. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J. 2003. Tenant farming. In The Oxford encyclopedia of economic history, ed. J. Mokyr, Vol. 5. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J. 2007. The ‘case’ for case studies zin the new institutional economics. In New institutional economics: A guidebook, ed. J. Glachant and E. Brousseau. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., T. Eggertsson, and D.C. North. 1996a. Empirical studies in institutional change. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., and J.P. Ferrie. 1993. Paternalism in agricultural labor contracts in the U.S. South: Implications for the growth of the welfare state. American Economic Review 83: 852–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., and J.P. Ferrie. 1999. Southern paternalism and the rise of the welfare state: Economics, politics, and institutions in the U.S. South, 1865–1965. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J. and Gallo, A. 2007. Electoral fraud, the rise of Peron, and demise of checks and balances in Argentina. Working Paper No. ES2007-0001, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., G.D. Libecap, and B. Mueller. 1999. Titles, conflict and land use: The development of property rights and land reform in the Brazilian Amazon Frontier. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., G.D. Libecap, and B. Mueller. 2000. Land reform policies: The sources of violent conflict, and implications for deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environmental and Economics and Management 39: 162–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., Libecap, G. and Mueller, B. 2005. How interest groups can influence political outcomes indirectly through information manipulation: The landless peasants movement in Brazil. Working Paper No. EB2005-0005, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., G.D. Libecap, and R. Schneider. 1996b. The determinants and impact of property rights: Land titles on the Brazilian frontier. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 12: 25–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., and B. Mueller. 2005. Property rights and the state. In Menard and Shirley (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L.J., and B. Mueller. 2006. Pork for policy: Executive and legislative exchange in Brazil. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 22: 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.L., and P.J. Hill. 2004. The not so wild, wild west: Property rights on the frontier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.L., and F.S. McChesney. 2003. Property rights: Cooperation, conflict and law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrunada, B., and V. Andonova. 2005. Market institutions and judicial rule-making. In Menard and Shirley (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. 1989. Economic analysis of property rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. 2002. A theory of the state: Economic rights, legal rights and the scope of the state. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., and R. Levine. 2005. Legal institutions and financial development. In Menard and Shirley (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M., and G. Tullock. 1962. The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J.M. 2005. Presidential versus parliamentary government. In Menard and Shirley (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1992. The institutional structure of production. American Economic Review 82: 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.W., and M.D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative leviathan: Party government in the house. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.W., and M.D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the agenda: Responsible government in the U.S. house of representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, K.J., and S.E. Masten. 1991. Pretia ex machina? Prices and process in long-term contracts. Journal of Law and Economics 34: 69–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A.T., and M. Munger. 1986. Legislators and interest groups: How unorganized interests get represented. American Political Science Review 80: 84–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, T. 1990. Economic behavior of institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, T. 1996. A note on the economics of institutions. In Empirical studies in institutional change, ed. L.J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. North. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 283–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J., and C. Shipan. 1990. Congressional influence on bureaucracy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn, E.G., and R. Richter. 2005. Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, V.P., and J.R. Erickson. 1987. Quantity and price adjustment in long-term contracts: A case study in petroleum coke. Journal of Law and Economics 31: 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. 2006. Institutions and the path to the modern economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, G.K. 2005. The many legal institutions that support contractual commitments. In Menard and Shirley (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Z.K., and G.D. Libecap. 2004a. The allocation of property rights to land: US land policy and farm failure in the northern great plains. Explorations in Economic History 41: 103–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Z.K., and G.D. Libecap. 2004b. Small farms, externalities, and the dust bowl of the 1930s. Journal of Political Economy 112: 665–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. 1987. Crisis and leviathan: Critical episodes in the growth of American government. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iaryczower, M., P. Spiller, and M. Tommasi. 2002. Judicial independence in unstable environments, Argentina 1935–1998. American Journal of Political Science 46: 699–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P.L. 1985. Vertical integration and long-term contracts: The case of coal- burning electric generating plants. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1: 33–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, P., and S. Knack 2005. Social capital, social norms and the new institutional economics. In Menard and Shirley (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, F. 1992. Agency theory and franchising: Some empirical results. Rand Journal of Economics 23: 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B., and P.T. Spiller. 1994. The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 10: 201–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libecap, G.D. 1989. Contracting for property rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libecap, G.D., and Z.K. Hansen. 2003. Small farms, externalities, and the dust bowl of the 1930s. Working Paper No. 04-01, Department of Economics, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M., R. Noll, and B. Weingast. 1987. Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, C. 2005. A new institutional approach to organization. In Menard and Shirley (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, C., and M.M. Shirley. 2005. Handbook of new institutional economics. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norlin, K. 2003. Political corruption: Theory and evidence from the Brazilian experience. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. 2005. Understanding the process of economic development. Princeton: Princeton Economic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D., and B. Weingast. 1989. Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History 49: 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P.L., and L.J. Alston. 1992. Technological change and the organization of work in capitalist firms. Economic History Review 45: 330–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. 1978. The giant jigsaw puzzle: Democratic committee assignments in the modern house. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A., and B.R. Weingast. 1984. Legislative politics and budget outcomes. In Federal budget policy in the 1980s, ed. G.B. Mills and J.L. Palmer. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, M.M. 2005. Institutions and development. In Menard and Shirley (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicotte, R. 1997. The organization and regulation of international shipping cartels. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.E. 2000. Semicommon property rights and scattering in the open fields. Journal of Legal Studies 29: 131–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P.T. 1996. A positive theory of regulatory instruments: Contracts, administrative law or regulatory specificity. USC Law Review 69: 477–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P.T., and M. Tommasi. 2003. The institutional foundations of public policy: A transactions approach with application to Argentina. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 19: 281–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P.T., and M. Tommasi 2005. The institutions for regulation: An application to public utilities. In Menard and Shirley (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P.T., and M. Tommasi. 2007. The institutional foundation of public policy in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stegner, W.E. 1954. Beyond the hundredth meridian: John Wesley Powell and the second opening of the west. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telser, L. 1981. A theory of self-enforcing agreements. Journal of Business 53: 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B.R., and W. Marshall. 1988. The industrial organization of congress: Or why legislatures like firms are not organized as markets. Journal of Political Economy 96: 132–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B.R., and M.J. Moran. 1983. Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the FTC. Journal of Political Economy 91: 765–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. 2000. The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Alston, L.J. (2018). New Institutional Economics. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2468

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics