Skip to main content

Interacting Agents in Finance

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

Interacting agents in finance represent a behavioural, agent-based approach in which financial markets are viewed as complex adaptive systems consisting of many boundedly rational agents interacting through simple heterogeneous investment strategies, constantly adapting their behaviour in response to new information and strategy performance, and through social interactions. An interacting agent system acts as a noise filter, transforming and amplifying purely random news about economic fundamentals into an aggregate market outcome exhibiting important stylized facts such as unpredictable asset prices and returns, excess volatility, temporary bubbles and sudden crashes, large and persistent trading volume, clustered volatility and long memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Allen, H., and M. Taylor. 1990. Charts, noise and fundamentals in the London foreign exchange market. Economic Journal 100: 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., K. Arrow, and D. Pines, eds. 1988. The economy as an evolving complex system. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W., J. Holland, B. LeBaron, R. Palmer, and P. Taylor. 1997. Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In The economy as an evolving complex system II, ed. W. Arthur, S. Durlauf, and D. Lane. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., and R. Thaler. 2003. A survey of behavioral finance. In Handbook of the economics of finance, ed. G. Constantinidis, M. Harris, and R. Stulz. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L. 1993. The statistical mechanics of strategic interaction. Games and economic behavior 5: 387–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boswijk, H., C. Hommes, and S. Manzan. 2007. Behavioral heterogeneity in stock prices. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. 1993. Pathways to randomness in the economy: Emergent nonlinearity and chaos in economics and finance. Estudios Económicos 8: 3–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. 1997. Asset price behavior in complex environments. In The economy as an evolving complex system II, ed. W. Arthur, S. Durlauf, and D. Lane. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., and S. Durlauf. 2001a. Discrete choice with social interactions. Review of Economic Studies 68: 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., and S. Durlauf. 2001b. Interactions-based models. In Handbook of econometrics, ed. J. Heckman and E. Leamer, Vol. 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., and C. Hommes. 1997. A rational route to randomness. Econometrica 65: 1059–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., and C. Hommes. 1998. Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22: 1235–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., J. Lakonishok, and B. LeBaron. 1992. Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. Journal of Finance 47: 1731–1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, J., A. Shleifer, L. Summers, and R. Waldmann. 1990. Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economy 98: 703–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer, H. 1974. Random economies with many interacting agents. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1: 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J., and K. Froot. 1986. Understanding the US dollar in the eighties: The expectations of chartists and fundamentalists. Economic Record, special issue, 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J., and K. Froot. 1987. Using survey data to test standard propositions regarding exchange rate expectations. American Economic Review 77: 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1953. The case of flexible exchange rates. In Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. 1991. Game theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommes, C. 2006. Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. In Handbook of computational economics, volume 2: Agent-based computational economics, ed. L. Tesfatsion and K. Judd, 1109–1186. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hommes, C., J. Sonnemans, J. Tuinstra, and H. van de Velden. 2005. Coordination of expectations in asset pricing experiments. Review of Financial Studies 18: 955–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. 1991. Epidemics of opinion and speculative bubbles in financial markets. In Money and financial markets, ed. M. Taylor. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. 1993. Ants, rationality and recruitment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, B. 2006. Agent-based computational finance. In Handbook of computational economics, volume 2: Agent-based computational economics, ed. L. Tesfatsion and K. Judd, 1187–1233. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, B., W. Arthur, and R. Palmer. 1999. Time series properties of an artificial stock market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23: 1487–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux, T. 1995. Herd behavior, bubbles and crashes. Economic Journal 105: 881–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux, T., and M. Marchesi. 1999. Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multi-agent model of a financial market. Nature 397: 498–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T. 1993. Bounded rationality in macroeconomics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. 1981. Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review 71: 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. The limits of arbitrage. Journal of Finance 52: 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. 1957. Models of man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V., G. Suchanek, and A. Williams. 1988. Bubbles, crashes and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica 56: 1119–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion, L., and K. Judd, eds. 2006. Handbook of computational economics, volume 2: Agent-based computational economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hommes, C. (2018). Interacting Agents in Finance. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2466

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics