Skip to main content

Regional and Preferential Trade Agreements

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

This article discusses analytical developments in the literature on the economics and politics of preferential trade agreements (PTAs). It describes results obtained in the traditional theory that demonstrate the ambiguous welfare outcomes of preferential trade liberalization. Theoretical approaches to designing necessarily welfare- improving PTAs are also discussed. Finally, this article sets out recent analyses in the literature concerning the dynamic expansion of trade blocs, the endogenous determination of policy (relating to preferences within a PTA and to extra-union trade), and the effects of preferential agreements on the multilateral trade system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aghion, P., P. Antras, and E. Helpman. 2004. Negotiating free trade. Working paper no. 10721. Cambridge: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K., and R. Staiger. 1997a. Multilateral cooperation during the formation of free trade areas. International Economic Review 38: 291–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K., and R. Staiger. 1997b. Multilateral cooperation during the formation of customs unions. Journal of International Economics 42: 91–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. 1995. A domino theory of regionalism. In Expanding European regionalism: The EU’s new members, ed. R. Baldwin, P. Haaparanta, and J. Kiander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berglas, E. 1979. Preferential trading: The n commodity case. Journal of Political Economy 87: 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. 1971. Trade-diverting customs unions and welfare improvement: A clarification. Economic Journal 81: 580–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. 1993. Regionalism and multilateralism: An overview. In New dimensions in regional integration, ed. J. de Melo and A. Panagariya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. 1995. U.S. trade policy: The infatuation with free trade areas. In The dangerous drift to preferential trade agreements, ed. J. Bhagwati and A. Krueger. Washington, DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., and A. Panagariya. 1996. Free trade areas or free trade? The economics of preferential trade areas. Washington, DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohara, A., K. Gawande, and P. Sanguinetti. 2004. Trade diversion and declining tariffs: Evidence from Mercosur. Journal of International Economics 64: 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E., and C. Syropoulos. 1996. The size of trading blocs, market power and world welfare effects. Journal of International Economics 40: 411–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadot, O., J. de Melo, and M. Olarreaga. 1999. Regional integration and lobbying for tarriffs against non-members. International Economic Review 40: 635–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadot, O., J. de Melo, and M. Olarreaga. 2001. Can bilateralism ease the pains of multilateral trade liberalization? European Economic Review 45: 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadot, O., J. de Melo, and M. Olarreaga. 2002. Harmonizing external quotas in an FTA: A step backward? Economics and Politics 14: 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W., and A. Winters. 2002. How regional blocs affect excluded countries: The price effects of Mercosur. American Economic Review 92: 889–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M.-J. 2006. On the external trade barriers of preferential trade agreements: Empirical evidence from Mexican manufacturing industries. Mimeo: Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M.-J., and P. Krishna. 2006. On the external trade barriers of preferential trade agreements. Mimeo: Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A., and R. Stern. 1994. Multilateral trade negotiations and preferential trading arrangements. In Analytical and negotiating issues in the global trading system, ed. A. Deardorff and R. Stern. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, C. 2000a. Different paths to free trade: The gains from regionalism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 1317–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, C. 2000b. Multilateralism and the endogenous formation of preferential trade agreements. Journal of International Economics 52: 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehrels, F. 1956–1957. Customs union from a single–country viewpoint. Review of Economic Studies 24: 61–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. 1995. The politics of free trade arrangements. American Economic Review 85: 667–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. 1964. The pure theory of international trade. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M., and H. Wan. 1976. An elementary proposition concerning the formation of customs unions. Journal of International Economics 6: 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, P. 1998. Regionalism and multilateralism: A political economy approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 227–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, P. 2003. Are regional trading partners ‘natural’? Journal of Political Economy 111: 202–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, P., and J. Bhagwati. 1997. Necessarily welfare-improving customs unions with industrialization constraints: The Cooper–Massell–Johnson–Bhagwati proposition. Japan and the World Economy 154: 169–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. 1999. Free trade agreements as protectionist devices: Rules of origin. In Trade, theory and econometrics: Essays in honor of John S. Chipman, Studies in the modern world economy, ed. J. Melvin, R. Moore, and R. Riezman, Vol. 15. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. 1991. The move to free trade zones. In Policy implications of trade and currency zones, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. 1993. Regionalism versus multilateralism: Analytical notes. In New dimensions in regional integration, ed. J. de Melo and A. Panagariya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. 1997. A political economic analysis of free trade arrangements. American Economic Review 87: 506–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limão, N. 2006. Preferential trade agreements as stumbling blocks for multilateral trade liberalization: Evidence for the United States. American Economic Review 96: 896–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. 1957. The theory of customs unions: Trade diversion and welfare. Economica 24: 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, J. 2002. A theory of insidious regionalism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 571–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. 1955. The theory of customs unions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. 1964. Tariff preferences and the terms of trade. Manchester School of Economic Studies 32: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohyama, M. 1972. Trade and welfare in general equilibrium. Keio Economic Studies 9: 37–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornelas, E. 2005. Endogenous Free trade agreements and the multilateral trading system. Journal of International Economics 67: 471–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A. 1997a. The Meade model of preferential trading: History, analytics and policy implications. In International trade and finance: New frontiers for research: Essays in honor of Peter Kenen, ed. B. Cohen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A. 1997b. Preferential trading and the myth of natural trading partners. Japan and the World Economy 9: 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A. 2000. Preferential trade liberalization: The traditional theory and new developments. Journal of Economic Literature 161: 316–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A., and R. Findlay. 1996. A political economy analysis of free trade areas and customs unions. In The political economy of trade reform: Essays in honor of Jagdish Bhagwati, ed. R. Feenstra, D. Irwin, and G. Grossman. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A., and P. Krishna. 2002. On necessarily welfare-enhancing free trade areas. Journal of International Economics 57: 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. 1994. Why a free trade area? The tariff also rises. Economics and Politics 6: 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. 1995. Tariff revenue competition in a free trade area. European Economic Review 39: 1429–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riezman, R. 1979. A 3 × 3 model of customs unions. Journal of International Economics 9: 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saggi, K. 2006. Preferential trade agreements and multilateral tariff cooperation. International Economic Review 47: 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. 1993. Discussion on regionalism vs multilateralism: Analytical notes. In New dimensions in regional integration, ed. A. Panagariya and J. de Melo. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T., J. Whalley, and I. Wooton. 1993. Measuring the effects of regionalism on trade and welfare. In Regional integration and the global trading system, ed. K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. 1991. Regionalism and the world trading system. In Policy implications of trade and currency zones, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City: Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanek, J. 1965. General equilibrium of international discrimination. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. 1950. The customs unions issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonnacott, P., and M. Lutz. 1987. Is there a case for free trade areas? In Free trade areas and US trade policy, ed. J. Schott. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S.-S. 1996. Endogenous formation of customs unions under imperfect competition: Open regionalism is good. Journal of International Economics 41: 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeats, A. 1998. Does Mercosur’s trade performance raise concerns about the effects of regional trade arrangements? World Bank Economic Review 12: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Krishna, P. (2018). Regional and Preferential Trade Agreements. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2447

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics