Skip to main content

Individual Learning in Games

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

This article reviews individual models of learning in games. We show that the experience-weighted attraction (EWA) learning nests different forms of reinforcement and belief learning, and that belief learning is mathematically equivalent to generalized reinforcement, where even unchosen strategies are reinforced. Many studies consisting of thousands of observations suggest that the EWA model predicts behaviour out-of-sample better than its special cases. We also describe a generalization of EWA learning to investigate anticipation by some players that others are learning. This generalized framework links equilibrium and learning models, and improves predictive performance when players are experienced and sophisticated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anderson, C., and C. Camerer. 2000. Experience-weighted attraction learning in sender-receiver signaling games. Economic Theory 16: 689–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. 1951. Iterative solution of games by fictitious play. In Activity analysis of production and allocation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C.F., and T.-H. Ho. 1999. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal-form games. Econometrica 67: 827–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., T.-H. Ho, and J.-K. Chong. 2002. Sophisticated learning and strategic teaching. Journal of Economic Theory 104: 137–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C.F., T.-H. Ho, and J.-K. Chong. 2004. A cognitive hierarchy model of one-shot games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119: 861–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, J.-K., C. Camerer, and T.-H. Ho. 2006. A learning-based model of repeated games with incomplete information. Games and Economic Behavior 55: 340–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D., and Kagel, J. 2004. Learning and transfer in signaling games. Working paper. Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cournot, A. 1960. Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses. Trans. N. Bacon as researches in the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth. Haffner: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erev, I., and A. Roth. 1998. Modelling predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed-strategy equilibria. American Economic Review 88: 848–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. 1991. Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica 59: 637–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and D. Levine. 1998. The theory of learning in games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, C. 1981. Learning the evolutionary stable strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 89: 611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T.-H., C. Camerer, and K. Weigelt. 1998. Iterated dominance and iterated best-response in p-beauty contests. American Economic Review 88: 947–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T.-H., C. Camerer, and J.-K. Chong. 2007. Self-tuning experience-weighted attraction learning in games. Journal of Economic Theory 133: 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, E. 2002. Two competing models of how people learn in games. Econometrica 70: 2141–2166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R., and T. Palfrey. 1995. Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior 10: 6–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjhee, D., and B. Sopher. 1994. Learning behavior in an experimental matching pennies game. Games and Economic Behavior 7: 62–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjee, D., and B. Sopher. 1997. Learning and decision costs in experimental constant-sum games. Games and Economic Behavior 19: 97–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A.E., and I. Erev. 1995. Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior 8: 164–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R., and R. Stoecker. 1986. End behavior in sequences of finite Prisoner’s Dilemma supergames: A learning theory approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7: 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, D. 2000. Rule learning in symmetric normal-form games: Theory and evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 32: 105–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J. 1995. Evolutionary game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ho, T.H. (2018). Individual Learning in Games. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2442

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics