The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Capital Theory (Paradoxes)

  • Luigi L. Pasinetti
  • Roberto Scazzieri
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_240

Abstract

Capital theory has led economists to discover relationships that look ‘paradoxical’ or counter-intuitive, as they run counter widely accepted ‘parables’. The transformation of microeconomic diminishing returns relations into a macro-social law induced the mistaken belief of an inverse, monotonic relation between the interest rate (and profit rate, taken as the ‘price of capital’) and the quantity of capital per head. Subsequent work alerted economists to the difficulty of finding aggregate measures of heterogeneous capital goods, and to the possibility that a falling rate of interest (and of profit) may be associated with a decrease not an increase) of the quantity of capital per head.

Keywords

Aggregation (of capital) Aggregation (production) Aghion, P. Beccaria, C. Bliss, C. J. Böhm-Bawerk, E. von Bruno, M. Burmeister, E. Cantillon, R. Capital accumulation Capital as a collection of physical assets Capital as a fund Capital intensity Capital measurement Capital theory Capital theory: parables Capital theory: paradoxes Chain index method of measurement Champernowne, D. G. Clark, J. B. Classical capital theory Cobb–Douglas functions Cohen curiosum Cohen, R. Construction period and utilization period, in Hicks’s theory of capital Denison, E. Diminishing returns Discontinuities in input use Distribution of income Duration parameters in production models Embodied technical change Financial and technical conceptions of capital Fisher, F. Garegnani, P. Gordon, R. Harcourt, G. C. Heterogeneity of capital goods Hicks, J. R. Hidden reswitching Howitt, P. Hulton, C. Increasing returns Intertemporal equilibrium Jevons, W. S. Kaldor, N. Law of variable proportions Levhari, D. Loanable funds Locke, J. Longfield, M. Marginal productivity theory Morishima, M. Multifactor productivity Neoclassical production function Net capital stocks Non-monotonic relations in capital theory Pasinetti, L. Petty, W. Physiocracy Production matrix Production techniques Rate of interest Rate of profit Reswitching of technique Reverse capital deepening Ricardo, D. Robinson, J. V. Rosser, J. B. Roundabout methods of production Rymes, T. Samuelson, P. A. Say, J.-B. Schefold, B. Senior, N.W. Sheshinski, E. Smith, A. Solow, R. Sraffa, P. Starrett, D. Steady state Stiglitz, J. Structural change Structural economic dynamics Surrogate production function Sylos Labini, P. Temporary equilibrium Thünen, J. H. von Variable proportions, law of Vertically integrated sectors Vertically integrated labour coefficients Vertically integrated units of productive capacity Weitzman, M. Wicksell, K. 

JEL Classifications

E22 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 1998. Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, P., K.J. Arrow, and D. Pines, eds. 1988. The economy as an evolving complex system. Redwood City: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, W.B., S. Durlauf, and D. Lane, eds. 1997. The economy as an evolving complex system II. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Baranzini, M., and R. Scazzieri. 1990. The economic theory of structure and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beccaria, C. 1804. Elementi di economia pubblica (ms 1771–72). In Scrittori Classici Italiani di Economia Politica, Vol. XVIII, 17–356 and Vol. XIX, 5–166, ed. P. Custodi. Milan: Destefanis.Google Scholar
  6. Bliss, C.J. 1975. Capital theory and the distribution of income. Amsterdam/Oxford/North-Holland/New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Bliss, C.J. 2005. Introduction. The theory of capital: A personal overview. In Capital theory, ed. J. Bliss, A.J. Cohen, and G.C. Harcourt, vol. 1. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Bruno, M., E. Burmeister, and E. Sheshinski. 1966. The nature and implications of the reswitching of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 526–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burmeister, E., and P. Hammond. 1977. Maximin paths of heterogeneous capital accumulation and the instability of paradoxical steady states. Econometrica 45: 853–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cannan, E. 1929. A review of economic theory. London: P.S. King and Son Ltd..Google Scholar
  11. Cas, A., and T.K. Rymes. 1991. On concepts and measures of multifactor productivity in Canada, 1961–1980. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Champernowne, D. 1953. The production function and the theory of capital: A comment. Review of Economic Studies 21: 112–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, J.B. 1899. The distribution of wealth. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, A.J., and G.C. Harcourt. 2003. Retrospectives. Whatever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, A.J., and G.C. Harcourt. 2005. Introduction. Capital theory controversy: Scarcity, production, equilibrium and time. In Capital theory, ed. J. Bliss, A.J. Cohen, and G.C. Harcourt, vol. 1. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. Denison, E.F. 1993. Robert J. Gordon’s concept of capital. Review of income and wealth 39: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Felipe, J., and F.G. Adams. 2005. A theory of production: The estimation of the Cobb–Douglas function: A retrospective view. Eastern Economic Journal 31: 427–445.Google Scholar
  18. Felipe, J., and F.M. Fisher. 2003. Aggregation in production functions: What applied economists should know. Metroeconomica 54: 208–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher, F.M. 1969. The existence of aggregate production functions. Econometrica 37: 553–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher, F.M. 1971. Aggregate production functions and the explanation of wages: A simulation experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics 53: 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher, F.M. 1987. Aggregation problem. In The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, vol. 1. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Fisher, F.M. 2003. Cambridge capital controversies. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (4): 228–229.Google Scholar
  23. Fisher, F.M., R. Solow, and J.M. Kearl. 1977. Aggregate production functions: Some CES experiments. Review of Economic Studies 44: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garegnani, P. 1966. Switching of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 554–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garegnani, P. 1970. Heterogeneous capital, the production function and the theory of distribution. Review of Economic Studies 37: 407–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garegnani, P. 2005. Capital and intertemporal equilibria: A reply to Mandler. Metroeconomica 56: 411–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gordon, R.J. 1990. The measurement of durable goods prices. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gordon, R.J. 1993. Reply: The concept of capital. Review of Income and Wealth 39: 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hagemann, H., M. Landesmann, and R. Scazzieri, eds. 2003. The economics of structural change. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  30. Hahn, F. 1966. Equilibrium dynamics with heterogeneous capital goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 53: 633–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hahn, F. 1982. The neo-Ricardians. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Han, Z., and B. Schefold. 2006. An empirical investigation of paradoxes: Reswitching and reverse capital deepening in capital theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30: 737–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harcourt, G.C. 1972. Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hicks, J. 1965. Capital and growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hicks, J. 1973. Capital and time: A Neo-Austrian theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hicks, J. 1977. Capital controversies: Ancient and modern. In Economic perspectives: Further essays on money and growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hicks, J. 1979. Causality in economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Hulten, C.R. 1992. Accounting for the wealth of nations: The net versus gross output controversies and its ramifications. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (Supplement): 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jevons, W.S. 1879. The theory of political economy. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan and Co (1st edn 1871).Google Scholar
  40. Kaldor, N. 1937. Annual survey of economic theory: The recent controversy on the theory of capital. Econometrica 5: 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levhari, D. 1965. A nonsubstitution theorem and switching of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics 79: 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levhari, D., and P. Samuelson. 1966. The nonswitching theorem is false. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 518–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCombie, J.S.L. 1998. Are there laws of production?: An assessment of the early criticisms of the Cobb–Douglas production function. Review of Political Economy 10: 141–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mandler, M.A. 2005. Well-behaved production economies. Metroeconomica 56: 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morishima, M. 1964. Equilibrium,stability and growth: A multi-sectoral analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Morishima, M. 1966. Refutation of the nonswitching theorem. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 520–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pasinetti, L.L. 1965. Changes in the rate of profit and degree of mechanization: A controversial issue in capital theory. Unpublished paper presented at the First World Congress of the Econometric Society, Rome.Google Scholar
  48. Pasinetti, L.L. 1966. Changes in the rate of profit and switches of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pasinetti, L.L. 1969. Switches of technique and the ‘rate of return’ in capital theory. Economic Journal 79: 508–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pasinetti, L.L. 1973. The notion of vertical integration in economic analysis. Metroeconomica 25: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pasinetti, L.L. 1981. Structural change and economic growth: A theoretical essay on the dynamics of the wealth of nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pasinetti, L.L. 1993. Structural economic dynamics: A theory of the economic consequences of human learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pasinetti, L.L. 2000. Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 53: 383–431.Google Scholar
  54. Pasinetti, L.L. 2003. Cambridge capital controversies. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (4): 227–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ricardo, D. 1817. On the principles of olitical economy and taxation. Vol. I of the works and correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M.H. Dobb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  56. Robinson, J. 1953. The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economic Studies 21 (2): 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Robinson, J. 1956. The accumulation of capital. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Robinson, J. 1975. The unimportance of reswitching. Quarterly Journal of Economics 89, 32–39. Reprinted in Robinson, J. 1979. Collected economic papers, Vol. 5. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Robinson, J., and K.A. Naqvi. 1967. The badly behaved production function. Quarterly Journal of Economics 81: 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosser, J.B. Jr. 1983. Reswitching as a cusp catastrophe. Journal of Economic Theory 31: 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosser, J.B. 2000. From Catastrophe to Chaos: A general theory of economic discontinuities. In Mathematics, microeconomics, macroeconomics, and finance, vol. 1, 2nd ed. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. Samuelson, P.A. 1962. Parable and realism in capital theory: The surrogate production function. Review of Economic Studies 29: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Samuelson, P.A. 1966. A summing up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 568–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Say, J.B. 1817. Traité d’économie politique. 3rd ed. Paris: Déterville (1st edn 1803).Google Scholar
  65. Schefold, B. 1997. Normal prices, technical change and accumulation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schefold, B. 2005. Reswitching as a case of instability of intertemporal equilibria. Metroeconomica 56: 438–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Vol.II of the glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press. General editors R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner; textual editor W.B. Todd.Google Scholar
  68. Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Starrett, D. 1969. Switching and reswitching in a general production model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 83: 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stiglitz, J. 1973. The badly behaved economy with the well-behaved production function. In Models of economic growth, ed. J.A. Mirrlees and N.H. Stern. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Sylos Labini, P. 1995. Why the interpretation of the Cobb–Douglas production function must be radically changed. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 6: 485–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thünen, J.-H. 1857. Le salaire naturel et son rapport au taux de l’intérêt. Trans. M. Wolkoff. Paris: Guillaumin et Cie. German original published in 1850.Google Scholar
  73. von Böhm-Bawerk, E. 1889. Positive Theorie des Kapitales (Kapital und Kapitalzins, Zweite Ableitung). Trans. The Positive Theory of Capital. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  74. Wicksell, K. 1901–6. Lectures on political economy. Vol. 1, General theory. London: Routledge, 1934.Google Scholar
  75. Zambelli, S. 2004. The 40% neoclassical aggregate theory of production. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luigi L. Pasinetti
    • 1
  • Roberto Scazzieri
    • 1
  1. 1.