The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Reciprocity and Collective Action

  • Rajiv Sethi
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2395

Abstract

A collective action problem arises when the private incentives faced by individual members of a group are not properly aligned with their shared goals. Such problems can be overcome if opportunistic behaviour is restrained by explicit sanctions or internalized social norms. In particular, collective action is facilitated by norms of reciprocity that induce individuals to undertake pro-social actions whenever they expect others to do the same. From this perspective, collective action requires coordinated expectations and effective communication. Experimental evidence suggests that reciprocity norms are widespread in human populations, and evolutionary mechanisms that can account for their prevalence have been identified.

Keywords

Assortative matching Cheap talk Collective action Cooperation Coordination problems and communication Free-rider problem Public goods Reciprocity Social norms Subgame perfection Tragedy of the commons 

JEL Classifications

C9 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bergstrom, T.C., L. Blume, and H. Varian. 1986. On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics 29: 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bromley, D.W. 1992. Making the commons work: Theory, practice and policy. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fehr, E., and S. Gächter. 2000. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90: 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fudenberg, D., and E. Maskin. 1986. The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica 54: 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ostrom, E., J. Walker, and R. Gardner. 1992. Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review 86: 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sethi, R., and E. Somanathan. 2001. Preference evolution and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Theory 97: 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sober, E., and D.S. Wilson. 1998. Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajiv Sethi
    • 1
  1. 1.