The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Empty Boxes

  • N. F. R. Crafts
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_238

Abstract

‘Empty Economic Boxes’ is the title of a famous article in the Economic Journal of 1922 and a phrase which has subsequently entered the language of economics as a shorthand for ‘abstract theory without practical relevance’. The paper was written by J.H. Clapham, the leading British economic historian of the interwar years and first Professor of Economic History at Cambridge University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Alchian, A. 1963. Reliability of progress curves in airframe production. Econometrica 31(4): 679–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clapham, J.H. 1922. Of empty economic boxes. Economic Journal 32: 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clapham, J.H. 1926. An economic history of modern Britain. Vol. 1: The early railway age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clapham, J.H. 1931. Economic history as a discipline. In Encyclopaedia of the social sciences, vol. 5, ed. E.R.A. Seligman and A. Johnson. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Clapham, J.H. 1932. An economic history of modern Britain. Vol. 2: Free trade and steel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clapham, J.H. 1938. An economic history of modern Britain. Vol. 3: Machines and national rivalries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Command Paper no. 7198. 1978. A review of monopolies and mergers policy. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  8. David, P.A. 1975. Technical choice, innovation and economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, H.S., and W. Fellner. 1943. External economies and diseconomies. American Economic Review 33(3): 493–511.Google Scholar
  10. Hay, D.A., and D.J. Morris. 1979. Industrial economics: Theory and evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hendry, D.F. 1980. Econometrics: Alchemy or science? Economica 47(188): 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnston, J. 1960. Statistical cost analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Kaldor, N. 1972. The irrelevance of equilibrium economics. Economic Journal 82: 1237–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knight, F.H. 1924. Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost. Quarterly Journal of Economics 38: 582–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leontief, W. 1971. Theoretical assumptions and nonobserved facts. American Economic Review 61(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
  16. McClelland, P.D. 1975. Causal explanation and model building in history, economics and the new economic history. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pigou, A.C. 1920. The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Pigou, A.C. 1922. Empty economic boxes: A reply. Economic Journal 32: 458–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robertson, D.H. 1924. Those empty boxes. Economic Journal 34: 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Viner, J. 1931. Cost curves and supply curves. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3: 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walters, A.A. 1963. Production functions and cost functions: An econometric survey. Econometrica 31(1): 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. F. R. Crafts
    • 1
  1. 1.