Skip to main content

Epistemic Game Theory: Beliefs and Types

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

Modelling what each agent believes about her opponents, what she believes her opponents believe about her, and so on, plays a prominent role in game theory and its applications. This article describes Harsanyi’s formalism of type spaces, which provides a simple, elegant representation of probabilistic belief hierarchies. A special emphasis is placed on the construction of rich type spaces, which can generate all ‘reasonable’ belief hierarchies in a given game. Recent developments, employing richer representation of beliefs, are also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ahn, D. 2007. Hierarchies of ambiguous beliefs. Journal of Economic Theory 136: 286–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliprantis, C., and K. Border. 1999. Infinite dimensional analysis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster, W., and W. Böge. 1979. Bayesian game theory. In Game theory and related topics, ed. O. Moeschlin and D. Pallaschke. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. 1976. Agreeing to disagree. Annals of Statistics 4: 1236–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battigalli, P., and M. Siniscalchi. 1999. Hierarchies of conditional beliefs and interactive epistemology in dynamic games. Journal of Economic Theory 88: 188–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battigalli, P., and M. Siniscalchi. 2002. Strong belief and forward induction reasoning. Journal of Economic Theory 106: 356–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergemann, D., and S. Morris. 2005. Robust mechanism design. Econometrica 73: 1521–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., A. Brandenburger, and E. Dekel. 1991. Lexicographic probabilities and choice under uncertainty. Econometrica 59: 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böge, W., and T. Eisele. 1979. On solutions of Bayesian games. International Journal of Game Theory 8: 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A., and E. Dekel. 1993. Hierarchies of beliefs and common knowledge. Journal of Economic Theory 59: 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A., Friedenberg, A. and Keisler, H.J. 2006. Admissibility in games. Unpublished, Stern School of Business, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A., and J. Keisler. 2006. An impossibility theorem on beliefs in games. Studia Logica 84: 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tillio, A. 2006. Subjective expected utility in games. Working Paper No. 311, IGIER, Università Bocconi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L., and T. Wang. 1996. Beliefs about beliefs without probabilities. Econometrica 64: 1343–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L., and S. Zin. 1989. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica 57: 937–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler. 1989. Maxmin-expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F., and W. Pesendorfer. 2004. Self-control and the theory of consumption. Econometrica 72: 119–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. 1967–8. Games of incomplete information played by Bayesian players. Parts I, II, III. Management Science 14:159–182, 320–334, 486–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, A., and D. Samet. 1998a. Knowledge spaces with arbitrarily high rank. Games and Economic 22: 260–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, A., and D. Samet. 1998b. Topology-free typology of beliefs. Journal of Economic Theory 82: 324–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, T., M. Meier, and M. Piccione. 2005. Hierarchies of beliefs for compact possibility models. Journal of Mathematical Economics 41: 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, M. 2005. On the nonexistence of universal information structures. Journal of Economic Theory 122: 132–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, J.F., and S. Zamir. 1985. Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory 14: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S., and H. Shin. 2003. Global games: Theory and applications. In Advances in economics and econometrics (Proceedings of the eight world congress of the econometric society), ed. M. Dewatripont, L. Hansen, and S. Turnovsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Siniscalchi, M. (2018). Epistemic Game Theory: Beliefs and Types. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2375

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics