Skip to main content

Addiction

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 237 Accesses

Abstract

Research on addiction had already yielded a wide range of interesting and important findings when economists first arrived on the scene. The economic study of addiction was initiated by a seminal paper by Becker and Murphy (1988) which challenged the prevailing view of addiction as self-destructive, proposing instead a ‘rational account of addiction’. Although some empirical research has confirmed the model’s critical prediction that anticipated increases in future prices will decrease current demand for a drug, more recent research by economists, stimulated by the prior work from other disciplines, has challenged some of the rational account’s assumption and predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Becker, G., and K. Murphy. 1988. A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy 96: 675–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B., and A. Rangel. 2004. Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. American Economic Review 94: 1558–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, E., and D. James. 1999. The neurobiology of chemical addiction. In Getting hooked: Rationality and addiction, ed. J. Elster and O.-J. Skog. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., and B. Koszegi. 2001. Is addiction ‘rational?’ Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 1261–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., and B. Koszegi. 2004. A theory of government regulation of addictive bads: Tax levels and tax incidence for cigarette excise taxation. Journal of Public Economics 88: 1959–1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., and S. Mullainathan. 2005. Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy 5: 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laibson, D. 2001. A cue-theory of consumption. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 81–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. 1999. A visceral account of addiction. In Getting hooked: Rationality and addiction, ed. J. Elster and O.-J. Skog. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyvers, M. 2000. ‘Loss of control’ in alcoholism and drug addiction: a neuroscientific interpretation. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 8: 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, T., and M. Rabin. 1997. Addiction and self control. In Addiction: Entries and exits, ed. J. Elster. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacula, R., and F. Chaloupka. 2001. The effects of macro-level interventions on addictive behavior. Substance Use and Misuse 36: 1901–1922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L. 1973. The Vietnam drug user returns. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. 2000a. What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents’ perceptions of short-term and long-term consequences of smoking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. 2000b. Rejoinder: The perils of Viscusi’s analyses of smoking risk perceptions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 273–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. 2000. Comment: The perils of qualitative smoking risk measures. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 267–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertenbroch, K. 1998. Consumption self-control via purchase quantity rationing of virtue and vice. Marketing Science 17: 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertenbroch, K. 2003. Self-rationing: Self-control in consumer choice. In Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice, ed. G. Loewenstein, D. Read, and R. Baumeister. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Caroline Acker, Ted O’Donoghue and Antonio Rangel for helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Loewenstein, G., Rick, S. (2018). Addiction. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2361

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics