Skip to main content

Rational Choice and Political Science

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 131 Accesses

Abstract

‘Rational choice in political science’ stands for the application of the economics approach in the study of political phenomena. The research program is to rationalize collective behaviour that comes across as stupid or counterproductive. In its highbrow (esoteric) variant, rational choice is on the way out in political science. In its low-brow (sensible) variant, rational choice is here to stay, not as the dominant approach, but as one of three equal, and complementary, approaches: the rationalist approach, which focuses on individual agency; the culturalist approach, which centres on collective identities; and the structuralist approach, which emphasizes historical institutionalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Austen-Smith, D., and J. Banks. 1999. Positive political theory I: Collective preference. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D., and J. Banks. 2005. Positive political theory II: Strategy and structure. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. 2005. A lawmaker works, oddly enough, to keep his voters’ backyards dangerous: ‘Smokey Joe’ and the politics of corporate profit. The New York Times, 26 May, A28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. 2006. The white man’s burden: Why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much Ill and so little good. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (ed.). 1995. Rational choice theory and politics. Special issue of Critical Review (vol. 9, nos. 1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (ed.). 1996. The rational choice controversy: Economic models of politics reconsidered. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, T., and K. Krehbiel. 1987. Collective decision-making and standing committees: an informational rationale for restrictive amendment procedures. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 3: 287–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D., and I. Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35: 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1955. The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the abuse of reason, 1964. New York: Glencoe Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M.I. 2003. Is rational choice theory all of Social Science? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M.I., and A.S. Zuckerman, eds. 1997. Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, S. 1998. An information rationale for the power of special interests. American Political Science Review 92: 809–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T.J. 1992. The state in political science: How we become what we study. American Political Science Review 86: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K.R. 2005. Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. 2003. Public choice III. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. 2000. Political economics: Explaining economic policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post-Autistic Economics Network. Home Page. Available online at. http://www.paecon.net. Accessed 11 Feb 2007.

  • Sachs, J. 2005. The end of poverty. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K., and B. Weingast. 1987. The institutional foundations of committee power. American Political Science Review 81: 86–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. 1989. Why democracies produce efficient results. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1395–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lohmann, S. (2018). Rational Choice and Political Science. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2341

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics