The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Deterrence (Empirical), Economic Analyses of

  • Steven D. Levitt
  • Thomas J. Miles
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2337

Abstract

Empirical economic analyses of deterrence attempt to test the central prediction of Becker’s (1968) rational-actor model of criminal behaviour: that less crime occurs when the expected penalties are greater. When economists have broken the simultaneity of crime rates and crime-control policies, they have generally concluded that policing levels and the scale of incarceration reduce crime rates. Economists have made less progress in determining whether these reductions in crime are due to deterrence or incapacitation, but the research suggests that both effects are likely present. Evidence on the deterrent effect of capital punishment and particular victim precautions is far less convincing.

Keywords

Becker, G. Crime and the city Crime, economic theory of Deterrence (empirical), economic analyses of Deterrence (theory), economics of Granger–Sims causality Incapacitation vs deterrence Public enforcement of law Punishment 

JEL Classifications

K42 K14 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Ayres, I., and J. Donohue III. 1999. Nondiscretionary concealed weapons laws: A case study of statistics, standards of proof, and public policy. American Law and Economics Review 1: 436–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres, I., and S. Levitt. 1998. measuring positive externalities from unobservable victim precautions: An empirical analysis of Lojack. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron, S. 1994. A review of econometric evidence on the effects of capital punishment. Journal of Socio-Economics 23: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clotfelter, C. 1978. Private security and the public safety. Journal of Urban Economics 5: 388–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corman, H., and H. Mocan. 2000. A time-series analysis of crime and drug use in New York City. American Economic Review 90: 584–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dezhbakhsh, H., P. Rubin, and J. Shepherd. 2003. Does capital punishment have a deterrent effect? New evidence from postmoratorium panel data. American Law and Economics Review 5: 344–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Tella, R., and E. Schargrodsky. 2004. Do police reduce crime? Estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. American Economic Review 94: 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duggan, M. 2000. More guns, more crime. Journal of Political Economy 109: 1086–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehrlich, I. 1975. The deterrent effect of capital punishment: A question of life and death. American Economic Review 65: 397–417.Google Scholar
  11. Ehrlich, I. 1977a. The deterrent effect of capital punishment: Reply. American Economic Review 67: 452–458.Google Scholar
  12. Ehrlich, I. 1977b. Capital punishment: Further thoughts and additional evidence. Journal of Political Economy 85: 741–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, W., and E. Owens. 2005. Flypaper COPS. Mimeo. Department of Economics, University of Maryland. Online. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.417.401&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2005.
  14. Fisher, F., and D. Nagin. 1978. On the feasibility of identifying the crime function in a simultaneous equations model of crime and sanctions. In Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates, ed. A. Blumstein, D. Nagin, and J. Cohen. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  15. Granger, C. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross- spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Katz, L., S. Levitt, and E. Shustorovich. 2003. Prison conditions, capital punishment, and deterrence. American Law and Economics Review 5: 318–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kessler, D., and S. Levitt. 1999. Using sentence enhancements to distinguish between deterrence and incapacitation. Journal of Law and Economics 17: 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kovandzic, T., and T. Marvell. 2003. Right-to-carry concealed handguns and violent crime: Crime control through gun decontrol? Criminology and Public Policy 2: 363–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levitt, S. 1996. The effect of prison population size on crime rates: Evidence from prison overcrowding litigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levitt, S. 1997. Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime. American Economic Review 87: 270–290.Google Scholar
  21. Levitt, S. 1998a. Why do increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: Deterrence, incapacitation, or measurement error? Economic Inquiry 36: 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levitt, S. 1998b. Juvenile crime and punishment. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1156–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levitt, S. 2002. Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effects of police on crime: Reply. American Economic Review 92: 1244–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lott, J. Jr. 1998. More guns, less crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lott, J. Jr., and D. Mustard. 1997. Crime, deterrence, and right-to-carry concealed handguns. Journal of Legal Studies 26: 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ludwig, J. 1998. Concealed-gun-carrying laws and violent crime: Evidence from state panel data. International Review of Law and Economics 18: 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marvell, T., and C. Moody. 1994. Prison population growth and crime reduction. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 10: 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marvell, T., and C. Moody. 1996. Specification problems, police levels, and crime rates. Criminology 34: 609–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCrary, J. 2002. Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime: Comment. American Economic Review 92: 1236–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mocan, H., and R. Gittings. 2003. Getting off death row: Commuted sentences and the deterrent effect of capital punishment. Journal of Law and Economics 46: 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shavell, S. 1991. Individual precautions to prevent theft: Private versus socially optimal behavior. International Review of Law and Economics 11: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shepherd, J. 2004. Murders of passion, execution delays, and the deterrence of capital punishment. Journal of Legal Studies 33: 283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zimring, F., and G. Hawkins. 1991. The scale of imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven D. Levitt
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Miles
    • 1
  1. 1.