Skip to main content

Excess Volatility Tests

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

Stock prices frequently undergo big changes that do not coincide with commensurate changes in fundamentals (earnings, dividends, interest rates). Shiller and LeRoy and Porter formalized the idea that price volatility is excessive relative to fundamentals by deriving the implications for price volatility of the hypothesis that stock prices equal the present value of discounted dividends. Subsequent discussion focused on the extent to which their results were subject to econometric problems. Also, analysts observed that the adopted version of the present-value model presumed constant discount rates, as would be the case under risk neutrality. This possibly biases the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Campbell, J., and R. Shiller. 1988. The dividend–price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Review of Financial Studies 1: 195–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D., J. Poterba, and L. Summers. 1989. What moves stock prices? Journal of Portfolio Management 15: 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. 1970. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance 25: 283–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavin, M. 1983. Excess volatility in the financial markets: A reassessment of the empirical evidence. Journal of Political Economy 91: 929–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, C., and S. LeRoy. 1991. Econometric aspects of the variance bounds tests: A survey. Review of Financial Studies 4: 753–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S., and R. Shiller. 1981. The determinants of the variability of stock prices. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 71: 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleidon, A. 1986a. Bias in small-sample tests of stock price rationality. Journal of Business 59: 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleidon, A. 1986b. Variance bounds tests and stock price valuation models. Journal of Political Economy 94: 953–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocherlakota, N. 1996. The equity premium: It’s still a puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 42–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaCivita, C., and S. LeRoy. 1981. Risk aversion and the dispersion of asset prices. Journal of Business 54: 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, S. 1973. Risk aversion and the martingale model of stock prices. International Economic Review 14: 436–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, S. 1976. Efficient capital markets: Comment. Journal of Finance 31: 139–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, S. 1989. Efficient capital markets and martingales. Journal of Economic Literature 27: 1583–1621.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, S., and W. Parke. 1992. Stock price volatility: tests based on the geometric random walk. American Economic Review 82: 981–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, S., and R. Porter. 1981. The present value relation: Tests based on implied variance bounds. Econometrica 49: 555–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy, S., and D. Steigerwald. 1995. Volatility. In Handbook of finance, ed. R. Jarrow, V. Maksimovic, and W. Ziemba. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. 1978. Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 46: 1429–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, R., and E. Prescott. 1985. The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 15: 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. 1965. Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review 6: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. 1981. Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review 71: 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

LeRoy, S.F. (2018). Excess Volatility Tests. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2307

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics