The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Prediction Markets

  • Justin Wolfers
  • Eric Zitzewitz
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2305

Abstract

Prediction markets, sometimes referred to as ‘information markets’, ‘idea futures’ or ‘event futures’, are markets where participants trade contracts whose payoffs are tied to a future event, thereby yielding prices that can be interpreted as market-aggregated forecasts. This article summarizes the recent literature on prediction markets, highlighting both theoretical contributions that emphasize the possibility that these markets efficiently aggregate dispersed information, and the lessons from empirical applications which show that market-generated forecasts typically outperform most moderately sophisticated benchmarks. Along the way, we highlight areas ripe for future research.

Keywords

Constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) Decision markets Efficient market hypothesis Favourite-longshot bias Forecasting Gallup Poll Information aggregation Iowa Electronic Market Prediction Prediction markets Probability Spread betting 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Acknowledgment

Thanks to Colin Camerer, Robin Hanson, Ryan Oprea, Charles Plott, Paul Rhode, and Erik Snowberg for very helpful comments.

Bibliography

  1. Berg, J., R. Forsythe, F. Nelson, and T. Rietz. 2006. Results from a dozen years of election futures markets research. In Handbook of experimental economic results, ed. C. Plott and V. Smith. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, J., F. Nelson, and T. Rietz. 2003. Accuracy and forecast standard error in prediction markets. Mimeo: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, J., and T. Rietz. 2003. Prediction markets as decision support systems. Information System Frontiers 5: 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg, J., and T. Rietz. 2006. The Iowa Electronic Market: Lessons learned and answers yearned. In Information markets: A new way of making decisions in the public and private sectors, ed. R. Hahn and P. Tetlock. Washington, DC: AEI–Brookings Joint Center.Google Scholar
  5. Camerer, C. 1998. Can asset markets be manipulated? A field experiment with racetrack betting. Journal of Political Economy 106: 457–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, K.-Y. and Plott, C. 2002. Information aggregation mechanisms: concept, design and implementation for a sales forecasting problem. Working Paper No. 1131. Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  7. Grossman, S. 1976. On the efficiency of competitive stock markets where traders have diverse information. Journal of Finance 31: 573–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossman, S., and J. Stiglitz. 1976. Information and competitive price systems. American Economic Review 66: 246–253.Google Scholar
  9. Gürkaynak, R., and J. Wolfers. 2005. Macroeconomic derivatives: an initial analysis of market-based macro forecasts, uncertainty, and risk. In NBER international seminar on macroeconomics, ed. C. Pissarides and J. Frankel. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  10. Hahn, R., and P. Tetlock. 2006. Using information markets to improve decision making. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 29: 213–289.Google Scholar
  11. Hanson, R. 1999. Decision markets. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(3): 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanson, R. 2003a. Shall we vote on values, but bet on beliefs? Mimeo: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  13. Hanson, R. 2003b. Combinatorial information market design. Information Systems Frontiers 5(1): 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanson, R. 2006. Designing real terrorism futures. Public Choice 128: 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanson, R., and R. Oprea. 2005. Manipulators increase information market accuracy. Mimeo: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  16. Hanson, R., R. Oprea, and D. Porter. 2006. Information aggregation and manipulation in an experimental market. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60: 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herron, M., D. Cram, J. Lavin, and J. Silver. 1999. Measurement of political effects in the United States economy: a study of the 1992 presidential election. Economics and Politics 11: 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knight, B. 2006. Are policy platforms capitalized into equity prices? Evidence from the Bush/Gore 2000 presidential election. Journal of Public Economics 90: 751–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kyle, A. 1985. Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53: 1315–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manski, C. 2004. Interpreting the predictions of prediction markets. Working Paper No. 10359. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  21. Milgrom, P., and N. Stokey. 1982. Information, trade and common knowledge. Journal of Economic Theory 26: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson, F., G. Neumann, and P. Polgreen. 2006. Operating with doctors: Results from the 2004 and 2005 influenza markets. Mimeo: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  23. Ortner, G. 1998. Forecasting markets – an industrial application. Mimeo: Technical University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  24. Pennock, D., S. Lawrence, F. Nielsen, and C. Giles. 2001. Extracting collective probabilistic forecasts from web games. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  25. Plott, C. 2000. Markets as information gathering tools. Southern Economic Journal 67: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plott, C., and S. Sunder. 1982. Efficiency of experimental security markets with insider information: An application of rational expectations models. Journal of Political Economy 90: 663–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plott, C., and S. Sunder. 1988. Rational expectations and the aggregation of diverse information in a laboratory security markets. Econometrica 56: 1085–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rhode, P., and K. Strumpf. 2004. Historical presidential betting markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(2): 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhode, P., and K. Strumpf. 2006. Manipulating political stock markets: a field experiment and a century of observational data. Mimeo: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  30. Roberts, B. 1990. Political institutions, policy expectations, and the 1980 election: A financial market perspective. American Journal of Political Science 34: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Servan-Schreiber, E., J. Wolfers, D. Pennock, and B. Galebach. 2004. Prediction markets: Does money matter? Electronic Markets 14: 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Slemrod, J., and T. Greimel. 1999. Did Steve Forbes scare the municipal bond market? Journal of Public Economics 74: 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snowberg, E., and J. Wolfers. 2005. Explaining the favorite-longshot bias: Is it risklove, or misperceptions? Mimeo: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  34. Snowberg, E., J. Wolfers, and E. Zitzewitz. 2006. Partisan impacts on the stockmarket: Evidence from prediction markets and close elections. Mimeo: University of Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sunder, S. 1995. Experimental asset markets: A survey. In Handbook of experimental economics, ed. A. Roth and J. Kagel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wolfers, J., and E. Zitzewitz. 2004a. Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(2): 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolfers, J. and Zitzewitz, E. 2004b. Experimental political betting markets and the 2004 election. The Economists Voice 1(2). Online. Available at http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol1/iss2. Accessed 19 Feb 2006.
  38. Wolfers, J., and E. Zitzewitz. 2005a. Interpreting prediction market prices as probabilities. Mimeo: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  39. Wolfers, J., and E. Zitzewitz. 2005b. Using markets to inform policy: The case of the Iraq war. Mimeo: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  40. Wolfers, J., and E. Zitzewitz. 2006. Five open questions about prediction markets. In Information markets: A new way of making decisions in the public and private sectors, ed. R. Hahn and P. Tetlock. Washington, DC: AEI–Brookings Joint Center.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justin Wolfers
    • 1
  • Eric Zitzewitz
    • 1
  1. 1.