Abstract
In administering an individual income tax, a country must decide what constitutes an ‘individual’. This choice has traditionally been seen as one between making either the family or the individual the ‘unit of taxation’. The choice between the family and individual as the unit of taxation in the income tax – indeed in any tax or transfer programme – is not clear-cut, and involves difficult trade-offs between competing and worthwhile goals. This article examines some of the issues that countries face in choosing the unit of taxation, or what is often referred to as ‘taxing the family’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Alm, J., and M.I. Melnik. 2005. Taxing the ‘family’ in the individual income tax: An international perspective. Public Finance and Management 5: 67–109.
Alm, J., and L.A. Whittington. 1996. The rise and fall and rise... of the marriage tax. National Tax Journal 49: 571–589.
———. 1997. Income taxes and the timing of marital decisions. Journal of Public Economics 64: 219–240.
———. 1999. For love or money? The impact of income taxes on marriage. Economica 66: 297–316.
Apps, P.F., and R. Rees. 1999. Individual versus joint taxation in models with household production. Journal of Political Economy 107: 393–403.
Berliant, M., and P. Rothstein. 2003. Possibility, impossibility, and history in the origins of the marriage tax. National Tax Journal 56: 303–317.
Bittker, B.I. 1975. Federal income taxation and the family. Stanford Law Review 27: 1388–1463.
Boskin, M.J., and E. Sheshinski. 1983. Optimal tax treatment of the family. Journal of Public Economics 20: 281–297.
Bull, N., Holtzblatt, J., Nunns, J.R., and Rebelein, R. 1998. Assessing marriage penalties and bonuses. Working Paper. Washington, DC: Office of Tax Analysis, U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Congressional Budget Office. 1997. For better or for worse: Marriage and the federal income tax. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.
Feenberg, D.R., and H.S. Rosen. 1995. Recent developments in the marriage tax. National Tax Journal 48: 91–101.
Kleven, H.J., Kreiner, C.T., and Saez, E. 2006. The optimal income taxation of couples. Working Paper No. 12685. Washington, DC: NBER.
Kniesner, T.J., and J.P. Ziliak. 2008. Evidence of tax-induced individual behavioral responses. In Fundamental tax reform: Issues, choices, and implications, ed. J.W. Diamond and G.R. Zodrow. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Steuerle, C.E. 1999. Valuing marital commitment: The radical restructuring of our tax and transfer systems. The Responsive Community 9: 35–45.
US General Accounting Office. 1996. Income tax treatment of married and single individuals, GAO/GGD-96-175. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office.
Whittington, L.A., and J. Alm. 2003. The effects of public policy on marital status in the United States. In Marriage and the economy: Theory and evidence from advanced industrial societies, ed. S. Grossbard-Shechtman. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Alm, J. (2018). Taxation of the Family. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2299
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2299
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences