Skip to main content

Model Uncertainty

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

Model uncertainty is a condition of analysis when the specification of the model of analysed process is open to doubt. A failure to account for model uncertainty may result in poor decisions. This article reviews various approaches to representing model uncertainty. The approaches depend on the research context, differ in their degree of generality, and may be classified as deterministic versus stochastic, Bayesian versus frequentist, and treating model uncertainty as static versus viewing model uncertainty as evolving over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anderson, E., L.P. Hansen, and T.J. Sargent. 2003. A quartet of semigroups for model specification, robustness, prices of risk, and model detection. Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 68–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., and L.M. Berliner. 1986. Robust Bayes and empirical Bayes analysis with ε-contaminated priors. Annals of Statistics 14: 461–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P., and G.C. Tiao. 1962. A further look at robustness via Bayes’s theorem. Biometrika 49: 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W.A., S.N. Durlauf, and K.D. West. 2003. Policy evaluation in uncertain economic environments. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2003(1): 235–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, K., and A. Meltzer. 1969. The nature of policy problem. In Targets and indicators of monetary policy, ed. K. Brunner and A. Meltzer. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diels, H. 1951. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, S.C. 2004. Uncertainty and monetary policy. Oxford Economic Papers 56: 539–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, D. 1995. Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57: 45–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, D., J.S. Hodges, E.E. Leamer, C.N. Morris, and D.B. Rubin. 1987. A research agenda for assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. Report No. 2683-RC. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., and G. Gong. 1983. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. American Statistican 37: 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G., and M. Schneider 2006. Learning under ambiguity. Working Paper No. 527, Rochester Center for Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, J. 1998. The robustness of identified VAR conclusions about money. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 49: 207–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1935. The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J.A., and K.E. Rockett. 1988. International macroeconomic policy coordination when policymakers do not agree on the true model. American Economic Review 78: 318–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannoni, M. 2002. Does model uncertainty justify caution? Robust optimal monetary policy in a forward-looking model. Macroeconomic Dynamics 6: 111–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler. 1989. Maximin expected utility with non-unique priors. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., and T.J. Sargent. 2003. Robust control of forward-looking models. Journal of Monetary Economics 50: 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., and T.J. Sargent. 2006. Robustness. Working paper, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeting, J.A., D. Madigan, A.E. Raftery, and C.T. Volinsky. 1999. Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial. Statistical Science 14: 382–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. 1921. A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan. Repr. for the Royal Economic Society as Collected Writings, vol. 8, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. 1939. Professor Tinbergen’s method. Economic Journal 49: 558–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F.H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S., and R.A. Leibler. 1951. On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22: 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakernaak, H., and R. Sivan. 1972. Linear optimal control systems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B.T. 1988. Robustness properties of a rule for monetary policy. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 29: 173–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.S., and M. Morrison. 1999. Models as mediators. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, I.R., M.R. James, and P. Dupuis. 2000. Minimax optimal control of stochastic uncertain systems with relative entropy constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 45: 398–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. 1962. Conjectures and refutations. New York/London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.G. 1954. The foundations of statistics. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorfheide, F., and M. Del Negro. 2005. Monetary policy analysis with potentially misspecified models. Mimeo: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlow, R.J. 2006. Real-time model uncertainty in the United States: ‘Robust’ policies put to the test. Division of Research and Statistics, Federal Reserve Board: Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • von zur Muehlen, P. 2001. Activist vs. non-activist monetary policy: Optimal rules under extreme uncertainty. Finance and economics discussion series working paper no. 2, Federal Reserve Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, P. 1990. Risk-sensitive optimal control. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K., J.C. Doyle, and K. Glover. 1996. Robust and optimal control. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Onatski, A. (2018). Model Uncertainty. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2293

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics