The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Rotating Saving and Credit Associations (ROSCAs)

  • Jean-Marie Baland
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2259

Abstract

Rotating saving and credit associations (roscas) are the simplest form of collective financial institution. A rosca is a group of individuals who meet at regular intervals, each of whom contributes at each meeting a pre-determined amount to a collective ‘pot’ which is then given to one member. The latter is then excluded from receiving the pot in future meetings, while still being obliged to contribute to the pot. The meeting process repeats itself until each member has received the pot, thereby completing a cycle. Then the rosca can start a new cycle. From this description, the main virtues of roscas are clear: they do not require storage of funds, accounting and durations of obligations are transparent, and there are no complicated interest payments or debt management. Roscas are very popular in developing countries. For instance, average membership rates in Indonesia have been estimated at 40 per cent of the population (Armendariz de Aghion and Morduch 2005), 20 per cent in Taiwan (Levenson and Besley 1996) and 40 per cent in a Kenyan slum (Anderson and Baland 2002). Although roscas do exist alongside more formal financial institutions, they are often the sole saving and credit institution in many rural areas.

Keywords

Rotating saving and credit associations (roscas) Saving Social sanctions 

JEL Classifications

O1 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Ambec, S., and N. Treich. 2007. Roscas as financial agreements to cope with self control problems. Journal of Development Economics 82: 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, S., and J.-M. Baland. 2002. The economics of ROSCAs and intrahousehold allocation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 963–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, S., J.-M. Baland, and K. Moene. 2003. Sustainability and organizational design in Roscas: Some evidence from Kenya. Mimeo, Center for Research in the Economics of Development (CRED), University of Namur.Google Scholar
  4. Ardener, S. 1964. The comparative study of rotating credit associations. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 44: 202–229.Google Scholar
  5. Armendariz de Aghion, B., and J. Morduch. 2005. The economics of microfinance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Besley, T., S. Coate, and G. Loury. 1993. The economics of rotating savings and credit associations. American Economic Review 83: 792–810.Google Scholar
  7. Eeckhoudt, J., and K. Munshi. 2005. Mitigating regulatory inefficiency: The nonmarket response to financial regulation in India. Mimeo, Brown University.Google Scholar
  8. Gugerty, M. 2006. You can’t save alone: Commitment and rotating savings and credit associations in Kenya. Working Paper No. 2006-08, Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  9. Klonner, S., and A. Rai. 2006. Adverse selection in credit markets: Evidence from bidding roscas. Mimeo, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  10. Levenson, A., and T. Besley. 1996. The anatomy of an informal financial market: Rosca participation in Taiwan. Journal of Development Economics 51: 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Marie Baland
    • 1
  1. 1.