Skip to main content

Monetary Business Cycles (Imperfect Information)

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

Business cycle theories based on incomplete information start from the premise that key economic decisions on pricing, investment or production are often made on the basis of incomplete knowledge of constantly changing aggregate economic conditions. As a result, decisions tend to respond slowly to changes in economic fundamentals, and small or temporary economic shocks may have large and long-lasting effects on macroeconomic aggregates. This article provides an introductory overview of incomplete information-based theories of business cycles, from their origins to the most recent theoretical developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Amato, J., and H.S. Shin. 2003. Public and private information in monetary policy models. Working Paper No. 138, Bank of International Settlements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeletos, G.-M., and A. Pavan. 2004. Transparency of information and coordination in economies with investment complementarities. American Economic Review 94 : 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeletos, G.-M., and A. Pavan. 2007. Efficient use of information and social value of information. Econometrica 75 : 1103–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L., and D. Romer. 1990. Real rigidities and the non-neutrality of money. Review of Economic Studies 57 : 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L., G. Mankiw, and R. Reis. 2005. Monetary policy for inattentive economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 52 : 703–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bils, M., and P. Klenow. 2004. Some evidence on the importance of sticky prices. Journal of Political Economy 112 : 947–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., and N. Kiyotaki. 1987. Monopolistic competition and the effects of aggregate demand. American Economic Review 77 : 647–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G. 1983. Staggered prices in a utility maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 12 : 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, C. 2002. Public announcements, adjustment delays and the business cycle. Discussion paper, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, C. 2005. Heterogeneous information and the welfare effects of public information disclosures. Discussion paper, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, C., and L. Veldkamp. 2005. Knowing what others know: Coordination motives in information acquisition. Discussion paper, University of California, Los Angeles and New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G. 2006. A theory of demand shocks. Discussion paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. 1972. Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory 4 : 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackowiak, B., and M. Wiederholt. 2005. Optimal sticky prices under rational inattention. Discussion paper, Humboldt University Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G., and R. Reis. 2002. Sticky information versus sticky prices: A proposal to replace the new Kaynesian Phillips curve. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 : 1295–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G., R. Reis, and J. Wolfers. 2004. Disagreement about inflation expectations. In NBER macroeconomics annual 2003. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S., and H.S. Shin. 2002. The social value of public information. American Economic Review 92 : 1521–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. 1970. Introduction: The new microeconomics in employment and inflation theory. In Microeconomic foundations of employment and inflation theory. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, R. 2006. Inattentive producers. Review of Economic Studies 73 : 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. 2003. Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics 50 : 665–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. 2006a. Rational inattention: Beyond the linear-quadratic case. American Economic Review 96 : 158–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. 2006b. Rational inattention: A research agenda. Discussion paper, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, R. 1983. Forecasting the forecasts of others. Journal of Political Economy 91 : 546–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ui, T. 2003. A note on the Lucas model: Iterated expectations and the non-neutrality of money. Discussion paper, Yokohama National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. 2002. Imperfect common knowledge and the effects of monetary policy. In Knowledge, information and expectations in modern macroeconomics, ed. P. Aghion et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hellwig, C. (2018). Monetary Business Cycles (Imperfect Information). In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2250

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics