Abstract
Affirmative action practices go beyond non-discrimination to enhance employment, education, and business-ownership opportunities for minorities and women. Critics argue that affirmative action does this at the expense of white males who might be more qualified, and so could be both unfair and inefficient. Supporters claim that affirmative action is necessary to overcome the many inherent disadvantages faced by minorities and women, and could enhance efficiency by expanding the pool of available talent or because diversity itself has positive impacts. This article summarizes the evidence for these arguments and claims.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Antonio, A., et al. 2004. Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science 15: 507–510.
Athey, S., C. Avery, and P. Zemsky. 2000. Mentoring and diversity. American Economic Review 90: 765–786.
Attiyeh, G., and R. Attiyeh. 1997. Testing for bias in graduate school admissions. Journal of Human Resources 32: 524–548.
Badgett, L. 1995. Affirmative action in a changing legal and economic environment. Industrial Relations 34: 489–506.
Bates, T., and D. Williams. 1995. Preferential procurement programs and minority- owned businesses. Journal of Urban Affairs 17: 1–17.
Bowen, W., and D. Bok. 1998. The shape of the river. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carter, D., and A. Sapp. 1991. Police education and minority recruitment: The impact of a college requirement. Washington, DC: Police Executives Research Forum.
Coate, S., and G. Loury. 1993. Will affirmative action policies eliminate negative stereotypes? American Economic Review 83: 1220–1240.
Datcher Loury, L., and K. Garman. 1995. College selectivity and earnings. Journal of Labor Economics 13: 289–308.
Davidson, R., and E. Lewis. 1997. Affirmative action and other special considerations admissions at the University of California, Davis School of Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 1153–1158.
Dickens, W., and T. Kane. 1999. Racial test score differences as evidence of reverse discrimination: Less than meets the eye. Industrial Relations 28: 331–363.
Holzer, H., and D. Neumark. 1999. Are affirmative action hires less qualified? Journal of Labor Economics 17: 534–569.
Holzer, H., and D. Neumark. 2000a. Assessing affirmative action. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 483–568.
Holzer, H., and D. Neumark. 2000b. What does affirmative action do? Industrial and Labor Relations Review 53: 240–271.
Kane, T. 1998. Racial preferences and higher education. In The black-white test score gap, ed. C. Jencks and M. Phillips. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Kolpin, V., and L. Singell. 1996. The gender composition and scholarly performance of economics departments: A test for employment discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 49: 408–423.
Leonard, J. 1990. The impact of affirmative action regulation and equal opportunity law on employment. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 47–63.
Long, M. 2004. Race and college admissions: An alternative to affirmative action? Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 1020–1033.
Neumark, D., and R. Gardecki. 1998. Women helping women? Role model and mentoring effects on female Ph.D. students in economics. Journal of Human Resources 33: 220–246.
Sander, R. 2004. A systematic analysis of affirmative action in American law schools. Stanford Law Review 57: 368–483.
Stephanopoulos, G., and C. Edley. 1995. Review of federal affirmative action programs. Unpublished White House document. http://clinton4.nara.gov/textonly/WH/EOP/OP/html/aa/aa-lett.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Holzer, H.J., Neumark, D. (2018). Affirmative Action. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2202
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2202
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences